vote sync
vote sync he was on earlier and didn't post
vote sync he was on earlier and didn't post
I do because dkun said the same thingSync wrote:
you got me
also I don't believe NoHItter's claim about Wojjan changing his role afterr it was given out
anotherRantai wrote:
Pushing another mass claim?
Don't do it.
Chris wrote:
yeah nohitter was terrible but so were you
also you haven't claimed which is surprising considering dkun and nohitter both did and got unvoted
I agree. Can't do much at this point, but as Chris stated, it'd be better if 3/4ths of the people actually posted, y'know.Mashley wrote:
Okay NoHItter's gambit was terrible but obv we can't lych him.
Best lynches right now are pieguy and Backfire I think, due to general lack of or low quality posts. Thoughts, guys?
no, there definitely is a cop and a trackerfoulcoon wrote:
nohitter for being scummy and for there already being a tracker, and mashley partially for the original reason, and also for claiming he picked something most would perceive as town (70s pop or w/e).
well, we'll find out about both of them as soon as wojjan gets onbmin11 wrote:
I'm going to believe in NoHItter and dkun for their claims. NoHItter's rebalance and the edit on dkun's role PM seems like a convincing alibi. Normally, there wouldn't be much of a reason for the mod to edit their role PMs.
pieguy nohitter and you still had votes on me even at the end of the day what is this shit I COULD HAVE BEEN LYNCHED
IT'S MY LIFE ON THE LINE
fos: nohitter. his claim is believable (because of dkun's claim) but that doesn't mean he isn't scummier than a swamp
vote sync if you don't vote nohitterSync wrote:
maybe
let's try that post againpieguy nohitter and you still had votes on me even at the end of the day what is this shit I COULD HAVE BEEN LYNCHED
IT'S MY LIFE ON THE LINE
fos: nohitter. his claim is believable (because of dkun's claim) but that doesn't mean he isn't scummier than a swamp
GIVE YOUR INPUT AND VOTESync wrote:
god dammit i'm totally up for a nohitter lynch but let's at least wait for another person's input
tl;drNoHItter wrote:
Two, isn't that claim too convenient?
You claimed Setup Sleuth who conveniently got info about three investigative roles and how two of them have "bad intentions" just when you "obtained" a vig role from someone which you could use to verify that statement?
Besides, how does a motivation give you a Vig Kill? Motivations usually upgrade the ability you already have. How can an investigative role like Setup Sleuth get a Vig Kil from being motivated?
Two wrote:
convenient is expecting people to forget the bottom line: you claimed cop day 1 and claim to have both not been killed and not been roleblocked
as for why I got a vigilante kill, the only connection I can make is sleuth->detective->copish->cops have guns
I'm not wojjan
a mafia cop is just a role cop with the ability to discern town from independent and cover up their alignment, so I'm not seeing anything nonsensicalNoHItter wrote:
So basically the reason why you're suspecting me is because I'm alive and I successfully delivered a result?
You're forgetting the fact that the setup here is not known.
If there was a confirmed Mafia Roleblocker, then sure my staying alive and being unroleblocked would be suspicious, but there isn't.
Your argument about "me staying alive and being unroleblocked = scum" is basically WIFOM surrounding the Night Actions and roles.
Incidentally, an even more basic contradiction, how can a Cop be Mafia?
Cops investigate people to be guilty/not guilty.
You yourself are saying that I'm Cop, yes?
Despite the fact that there is already a term for "Role Cop" separate from "Cop"?Two wrote:
no, I'm saying I assume a mafia cop would function as a role cop in addition to what it normally does
Actually I already hinted who I investigated even before Two's claim.Chris wrote:
nohitter you're not going to deliver a result because you know your only option would be actually verifying a town member
if you picked mafia after we lynched you that'd be two down~
you can post as much as you like but you're mafia and you knowwww you're getting lynchedNoHItter wrote:
Wrong Chris.
You are pushing too hard on so little info that it is very scummy.
You only have Two's claim. You YOURSELF have no information whatsoever yet you are pushing HARDER than Two.
@Rantai
Like I said I am not willing to out him yet, but I gave a hint as to who I investigated.