you can start by voting for nohitterKokizi wrote:
So I apologize if I do very little to help you guys out.
you can start by voting for nohitterKokizi wrote:
So I apologize if I do very little to help you guys out.
I'm voting for KRZY aren't I?Two wrote:
and again you have no vote adam
Claiming != Telling your side of the story.Two wrote:
you refuse to tell your side of the story
"I do not want to claim my role yet"
I think that's a misunderstanding. I said I can't confirm that he's not guilty, not that he's guilty.Two wrote:
so you don't think someone getting a guilty result on him and, according to you, it making sense for him to be guilty is grounds for you to unvote krzy?
adam2046 wrote:
I think that's a misunderstanding. I said I can't confirm that he's not guilty, not that he's guilty.Two wrote:
so you don't think someone getting a guilty result on him and, according to you, it making sense for him to be guilty is grounds for you to unvote krzy?
adam2046 wrote:
Although that would explain why you were interested in what my power does.
adam hasn't revealed what exactly happened to him yet, but I'm sure it affected him positively.Two wrote:
if you're trying to verify your alignment through your actions, you're going to be roleclaiming in that way too
This was referring to his post and not the line before it.adam2046 wrote:
Although that would explain why you were interested in what my power does.
This however makes absolutely no sense to me though.NoHItter wrote:
There should be a key word in my previous post discussing your role.
It should have been posted there before that something happened to you.
Does it match what happened?
don't try to tell me that you are being needlessly cryptic about being a motivator while at the same time making it obvious to anyone who can read that you are a motivator, with the reason being that you don't want to reveal the details of your role that don't involve motivationTwo wrote:
You are roleclaiming it yourself and acting cryptic at the same time for no reason
...............Swiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:
Actually, to be honest, I don't think being demotivated would be helpful to the one that got targeted at all. Instead of getting a proper result (like, doctor protecting someone), they get a poor result (having the doctor not be able to protect/accidentally kill their target).
Two wrote:
was never brought up
You were saying?NoHItter wrote:
I can Motivate/Demotivate, but I can do something else.
If I claimed Motivator/Demotivator, you would it contradictory what may happen some time later.
On the other hand, if I claimed my role fully, it would be bad for town.
Happy now?
Two wrote:
no I will be happy when a demotivator who got a guilty result gets lynched
oh okay so you're not defending himBackfire wrote:
Please don't mistake me trying to stick up for him.
we're going off of what ladysuburu, the host, saidBackfire wrote:
I'm just saying at the moment, I feel like we shouldn't completely rely on what Mara says. Like I said, we don't know for sure if he's town completely. We're just going on the fact that he was MAYBE right ONE time.
He did say he's a motivator/demotivator, which is half-half. (Minus the additional role(s) he may have)Two wrote:
I'm trying to tell you that no one talked about demotivation being helpful. It's obviously only helpful if you use it on the opposing faction, whatever that may be.