It's been said once in a signature and I'll be glad to restate it (..or get it slightly off, but still):
When it all comes down to it, everything is WIFOM.
When it all comes down to it, everything is WIFOM.
forum
Paska Mafia (MAFIA & JESTER WIN)
posted
Total Posts
508
QUAR: DO YOU WIN WITH THE MAFIA?
of course I do.
Yet you claim shooting you will not help us at all.
That doesn't make much sense.
That doesn't make much sense.
OK
vote Q
vote Q
FoS O_o
I'm not gonna rest until I get a proper understanding of who the hell Quar is.
I'm not gonna rest until I get a proper understanding of who the hell Quar is.
THE LEFT EYE IS A ZEROSwiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:
FoS O_o
I'm not gonna rest until I get a proper understanding of who the hell Quar is.
HE'S EITHER A JESTER OR A MAFIA PRETENDING TO BE A JESTER. EITHER WAY HE'S NOT GOING TO BE TARGETTED BY THE MAFIA (THEY HAVE HIGHER PRIORITY TARGETS), SO I DON'T THINK SITTING AROUND WAITING FOR HIM TO BE NIGHTKILLED IS GONNA BE VERY EFFECTIVE.
..Yeah, I kinda noticed it's a 0, not an O; got lazy to make a double post, though. =/
But yeah, I'm not gonna vote for Quar, especially not today.
But yeah, I'm not gonna vote for Quar, especially not today.
HMM, IT JUST OCCURRED TO ME THAT YOU CAN KILL AFTER A MAFIA LYNCH. WHAT IF WE KEPT HIM AROUND UNTIL WE LYNCH A MAFIA, THEN YOU CAN SHOOT HIM?
..If I recall the flavor correctly, I'd have to be part of the vote, else it won't work. Not too sure about it, though.
Honestly, this setup is stupid enough all ready. If there is a jester, I'm voting Mara/Lilac/fishie.
Vote: Q
Vote: Q
He is not a jester.
HEYSwiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:
FoS O_o
I'm not gonna rest until I get a proper understanding of who the hell Quar is.
you know what would give you a comprehensible understanding of a mafia's role?
KILLING HIS SHIT
OH, OK, THANKS.UnderminE wrote:
He is not a jester.
Topic Starter
Vote: FisHie
This host must be Mafia, I swear!
This host must be Mafia, I swear!
Vote: LunaticMara
Oh yeah!?
Well... You suck!
Oh yeah!?
Well... You suck!
Because I am- no I'm lying.0_o wrote:
OH, OK, THANKS.UnderminE wrote:
He is not a jester.
Topic Starter
No! You suck!FisHie wrote:
Vote: LunaticMara
Oh yeah!?
Well... You suck!
VOTE STATUS
Quaraezha (5) - Quaraezha, Lybydose, Wojjan, 0_o, bmin11
IppE (1) - UnderminE
Wojjan (1) - Rantai
FisHie (1) - LunaticMara
LunaticMara (1) - FisHie
Not voting (7) - NoHItter, Luna, pieguy1372, Mashley, IppE602, Swiftwolf Yellowtail, DeathxShinigami
Correct me, if there is something wrong.
LunaticMara wrote:
VOTE STATUS
FisHie (1) - LunaticMara
LunaticMara (1) - FisHie
Vote: LunaticMara
I'll be leaving now.
THREAD NEEDS MORE PICS
HI LUNA
HI LUNA
Unvote, Vote: Q
I don't know anymore.
I don't know anymore.
Vote Q
aaaaa I don't know
whatever shenanigan he's pulling, I want to lynch him.
aaaaa I don't know
whatever shenanigan he's pulling, I want to lynch him.
No wait unvote
don't want to hammer him yet
don't want to hammer him yet
vote: Mashley
Might as well go off NoHItter's lead. And given this game, I bet Quaraezha is just a townie with some insane restriction. >.>
Might as well go off NoHItter's lead. And given this game, I bet Quaraezha is just a townie with some insane restriction. >.>
Honestly that does seem more likely to me @pieguy. But at the same time... blaaarthghfg I don't even want to think about Q.
a townie with that restriction would try to be SUCH an obv mafia that town is gonna think "naw he's jester keep him around"
a mafia with that restriction would be such an obv mafia by trying to get himself off the noose by claiming a role that'll help mafia.
a mafia with that restriction would be such an obv mafia by trying to get himself off the noose by claiming a role that'll help mafia.
?tifeneb dluow gniyd mih taht dias aifam "rehto" eht taht demialc ahzearauQ taht ddo ti dnif esle enoynA
.tahC 0-thgiN ro tahC yaD a rehtie seilpmi tahT
.su fo eno fo sseninwot eht mrifnoc dluow taht llik giv eerf a teg ew ,aifam SI eh fi sulp ,MOFIW eht fo dir teg ot tseb eb dluow won mih gnihcnyl taht kniht I oslA
Vote: Quaraezha
)!sdrawkcab ton si taht txet emos yllaniF(
.SUSNESNOC LARENEG A EVAH EW LITNU TEY REMMAH TON OD .1-L TA SI EH
.tahC 0-thgiN ro tahC yaD a rehtie seilpmi tahT
.su fo eno fo sseninwot eht mrifnoc dluow taht llik giv eerf a teg ew ,aifam SI eh fi sulp ,MOFIW eht fo dir teg ot tseb eb dluow won mih gnihcnyl taht kniht I oslA
Vote: Quaraezha
)!sdrawkcab ton si taht txet emos yllaniF(
.SUSNESNOC LARENEG A EVAH EW LITNU TEY REMMAH TON OD .1-L TA SI EH
Quaraezha wrote:
Such a sad world, indeed.
Topic Starter
VOTE STATUS
Quaraezha (7) - Quaraezha, Lybydose, Wojjan, 0_o, bmin11, Rantai, NoHItter
IppE (1) - UnderminE
Wojjan (1) - Rantai
Mashley (1) - pieguy1372
Not voting (5) - Luna, Mashley, IppE602, Swiftwolf Yellowtail, DeathxShinigami
Quaraezha (7) - Quaraezha, Lybydose, Wojjan, 0_o, bmin11, Rantai, NoHItter
IppE (1) - UnderminE
Wojjan (1) - Rantai
Mashley (1) - pieguy1372
Not voting (5) - Luna, Mashley, IppE602, Swiftwolf Yellowtail, DeathxShinigami
Well, I'm glad he's not a hated person, else the day would be over already. I still don't understand why he would be so negative about his role. He's claiming that he's mafia, stating that NoHItter isn't mafia, and apparently, some people are denying the fact that he could be a jester.
Hmm...
Hmm...
I'm too tired to deal with a Jester with WIFOM and the setup is already anti-town enough ._. And as I stated before, I'm not taking this game serious anymore.
Vote: NoHItter
Putting someone at L-1 but asking people to not lynching is hoping for someone to do that exactly while no blame falls on you yourself.
Way to cover your ass I guess, backwardsboy.
I mean, why would you even vote him if we haven't reached your "general consensus," which, mind, I actually think we already had. Didn't everyone pretty much agree that shooting Q would be good? Why not lynch him then?
Putting someone at L-1 but asking people to not lynching is hoping for someone to do that exactly while no blame falls on you yourself.
Way to cover your ass I guess, backwardsboy.
I mean, why would you even vote him if we haven't reached your "general consensus," which, mind, I actually think we already had. Didn't everyone pretty much agree that shooting Q would be good? Why not lynch him then?
Unvote, Vote: UnderminE
I don't wanna lynch Q.
I don't wanna lynch Q.
x.x
.ssucsid ot gnihtemos evah yam llits ew sa tey remmah ot ton elpoep gninraw yleniuneg ma I rOWojjan wrote:
Putting someone at L-1 but asking people to not lynching is hoping for someone to do that exactly while no blame falls on you yourself.
Way to cover your ass I guess, backwardsboy.
.erusnu llits era elpoep emos taht dna toohs =/= hcnyl ecniSWojjan wrote:
I mean, why would you even vote him if we haven't reached your "general consensus," which, mind, I actually think we already had. Didn't everyone pretty much agree that shooting Q would be good? Why not lynch him then?
.aifam eht tifeneb dluow mih GNILLIK taht dias auQ taht etoN
.llik dna hcnyl neewteb ecnereffid a s'ereht emag aifaM a nI
.llik dna hcnyl neewteb ecnereffid a s'ereht emag aifaM a nI
If you don't want people to hammer him and if you're unsure if lynching him would do us good, why did you put him up to L-1?NoHItter wrote:
.ssucsid ot gnihtemos evah yam llits ew sa tey remmah ot ton elpoep gninraw yleniuneg ma I rOWojjan wrote:
Putting someone at L-1 but asking people to not lynching is hoping for someone to do that exactly while no blame falls on you yourself.
Way to cover your ass I guess, backwardsboy..erusnu llits era elpoep emos taht dna toohs =/= hcnyl ecniSWojjan wrote:
I mean, why would you even vote him if we haven't reached your "general consensus," which, mind, I actually think we already had. Didn't everyone pretty much agree that shooting Q would be good? Why not lynch him then?