Unfortunately, I don't think any amount of explaining would give lesser known mappers any chance at ranking this.
Are you implying that experienced mappers are being given more leeway unfairly? Or that experienced mappers are more likely to be believed in their artistic intend than people who have never shown any evidence whatsoever that they are aware of what they are doing? At first, this might appear biased and unfair but would you entrust experiments to people who know when they are being experimental or would you entrust experiments to people that do one by sheer happenstance without being fully aware of what the ups and downs of their own creation are? Mapping is a social game and establishing yourself in a social environment is crucial to find yourself and your actions more accepted. This is how society works. And I find it fair that people first have to proof and establish that they are knowing what they are doing before they confront this community with controversial and experimental content where it is uncertain whether this is good or bad.
Are you implying that experienced mappers are being given more leeway unfairly? Or that experienced mappers are more likely to be believed in their artistic intend than people who have never shown any evidence whatsoever that they are aware of what they are doing? At first, this might appear biased and unfair but would you entrust experiments to people who know when they are being experimental or would you entrust experiments to people that do one by sheer happenstance without being fully aware of what the ups and downs of their own creation are? Mapping is a social game and establishing yourself in a social environment is crucial to find yourself and your actions more accepted. This is how society works. And I find it fair that people first have to proof and establish that they are knowing what they are doing before they confront this community with controversial and experimental content where it is uncertain whether this is good or bad.