00:08:578 (1) - 01:34:766 (6) - converting these to circles would make the 1/4 sliders be more tied to the synth noise, else rhythm seems kind of spammy and doesnt provide much contrast
00:32:280 (4) - consider extending and doing a more unique shape to pick up on the guitar
00:31:948 (2,3,4) - also maybe unstack for more engaging movement? https://gyazo.com/d8809b7ed5c47dfc9961c2cd51c6dfa5
00:44:711 (9,1,2,3,4,5) - the repeated pattern here could represent the song better, as the previous one 00:43:550 (1,2,3,4,5) - had all the 1/4 sliders representing vocal sounds, 00:44:876 (1) - the first 1/4 slider here doesnt have one though, 00:44:711 (9) - and the circle before has one, so the exact repeat seems kind of forced. you could still keep most of the pattern and stick more closely to the vocal like this:
https://gyazo.com/35252fcbc98066560ae43e0d5788c1e8 starting from 00:43:550 (1) -
00:56:810 (1,2) - 00:58:136 (1,2) - spacing feels underwhelming for these, as you dont have much cursor movement between each slider. with higher spacing, theres more emphasis on the strong sliderheads and its a nice contrast of movement, since the player switched between fast/slow movement between/within sliders
example: https://gyazo.com/12a5ad042d59d1a42ce57cf6eb375017
01:07:749 (2,3) - similar thing here where the strong finish doesnt get much spacing but the surrounding kicks do, in a map that uses high spacing to emphasize sounds everywhere, i dont see the reasoning for the sudden "anti spacing" here
resolve was unintentional >-<
it is
the finish is quite important but i really dont want to emphasis it by adding ds/sv because this part already fast enough.
since its sth like 1/1 gap id love to give a suddenly small sv and ds.
01:05:926 (8,1) - 这个跳 不太适合钝角吧 打起来也有强烈的不适感 建议01:06:092 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) ctrl G 然后位置稍微移动一下
i dont think that logic holds up, 01:11:396 (1,2,3,4,5) - you just showed u are following the vocal, 01:12:556 - ignoring it right after seems like a bad idea
emmm but start with just snap to voice it quite weird at least for me
i dont matter to place a note here though
just a bit confusing..
01:21:175 (2,1) - the spacing here is abnormally large compared to similar instances 01:31:782 (4,1) - 00:47:860 (3,4) -
id recommend nerfing to at most 00:47:860 (3,4) - the spacing used here