00:02:275 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - what we talked about before, you can probably just take 00:02:275 (1,2,3,4) - and place where 00:02:847 (5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - is and vice versa, and then copy paste the rest, and then move the next set over to the right to make it a hyper
00:13:418 (8,9,1) - this feels overall a bit too wide, if you can please nerf the distance between 9 and 1
00:19:704 (3,4,1,2,3,4) - tbh would map these as the same pattern as 00:18:275 (1,2,3,4) - since what you currently have here 00:19:418 (1,2) - makes more sense for emphasis due to a piano sound
00:48:542 (1,2,3) - I am extremely sketchy on whether this is too wide or not, mainly commenting on it just so it's looked at
the triangle is fine, however i do find that the pattern right after at 00:49:167 (6,7) - to feel a bit unconfortable because of the spacing
00:58:542 (1,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - can flip these inwards to have a nice change to separate when 01:00:417 (9,1) - occurs
01:18:542 (1,2,3,4) - 01:19:542 (1,2,3,4) - really minor but i think curves would fit better with piano sounds
01:22:042 (1) - shouldn't it be hyperdash FROM the slidertick instead of TO the slidertick?
01:22:542 loud kick here, 01:22:417 reverse type of sound here, general contrast <- all this allows the emphasis change, would do that instead
02:06:170 (1,2,3,4) - 02:06:812 (6,7,1,2,3,4) - would make these doubles as well they'd fit nicely with the wub sounds
03:01:754 (3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6) - gameplay on these droplets feels pretty bad, tried this pattern several times and I dont think I caught them all once? i'd just remove the sliders and keep the notes
03:48:593 (1,2,3) - there's something about this part that feels a bit off, maybe try putting (3) on the opposite side? or ctrl+h'ing 03:45:593 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2) - and then moving 03:48:593 (1,2) - over to the left on top of (3) like this: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/19474435/0d52
03:50:968 (2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - more specifically, 03:51:593 (1,2,3) - since (1) is such a noticeable note in this sequence, I think this is where the directional change should be, not dashing through it to 03:51:718 (2) -
05:26:093 (1) - can you illness this lilin even further for epic (increase the distances more for emphasis)