Hoshizora no Ima

00:01:602 - Is this intention on mapping this LN? according to 00:00:305 - and 00:02:899 etc. - while they having same piano octave and chord, i know you try to arrange the LN Release but to keep consistent between these sound emphasization, i suggest to make it single note
Can example the similar one here
00:06:791 -
(There ain't be vocal representing since it already been here 00:01:440 (1440|2) - )

00:05:494 - VS 00:00:305 - as i said at first paragraph they having same octave and chord but have different on represented? ,suggest to make both chord, for an impact.

this can be moved 00:07:115 (7115|1) - because of the shield in this part, which I don't think is needed at all. there is no supporting melody for this pattern

00:08:899 - i have an idea on this structure to make it more better release
How about 00:08:899 (8899|0) - shorten this by 1/2 (to redline) ,and switch column between 00:09:223 (9223|1,9386|2) - for better visibility, so it would looks better, and player won't confused on LN usage.

00:10:521 - this was structure before go on for Picy Parts but i would take it here for both consider, about this arrangement

because i think it more flows for me instead of stuck on column 4 and being stack to LN, for harder playability.

00:22:845 - i still confused on this legacy pattern, which kinda not satisfied me, so i would define it likes this

would give better expression on piano.

00:25:926 (25926|1) - this note is fine,but for me move to column 3 for balancing is better.

00:27:548 (27548|0,27629|1,27710|0,27791|1,27872|2) - I think the dump here is not right to use because you used regular LN for vocals from the beginning, it's better for you to keep using Ln to be more consistent.

00:29:169 - the kick still audible even without hitsound, so prob can put double here

00:29:332 - another classic 2016 mapping meta again, how about this ,built on your own idea just swap it column

00:29:332 (29332|1,29413|2) - can flip to avoid 00:29:169 (29169|1,29332|1) - this feels unnecessary to use

00:30:304 - It's too overkill for you to give this on a casual map, you better nerf this to 1 LN 1/4 is more enough

00:30:953 - no vocal no drum but double? if guitar, nah single is enough for this kinda awkward if you use double

00:32:088 (32088|0) - how about make it 1/2 like 00:32:088 (32088|3) - give an expression on high pitch vocals.
apply on this either 00:32:737 -

00:34:359 - missing mini LN to be consistent like 00:33:061 - and 00:32:413 - etc.

00:36:629 til 00:40:196 - can keep following 00:32:088 - LN concept, because i think it looks better

00:40:359 - there are some unusual trill that being created for avoiding stacking anchor, so i think sacrifice double for all except the first one, to give an creative idea on this part.

Example

apply to 00:41:007 - too for consistent.

00:40:359 - can give jump a bit here like

00:45:629 - can be made overlap here to emphasize 00:45:710 - sound in this part

00:45:710 - i think it missed some kinda of double LNs like 00:45:872 -
because this part are still having vocal, and these are still able to place 1/4 LNs in. (it looks like it gave different expression, when you not giving player to know that these having LNs to represent vocals.)

00:47:656 (47656|1,47818|2) - can ctrl+h to avoid too much note on left side 00:47:332 (47332|0,47332|1,47494|0,47656|1,47980|0) -

00:52:683 (52683|2) - can move to col 1 to avoid this 00:52:521 (52521|2,52683|2,52845|2,53332|2) - too much anchor

00:54:953 (54953|0) - same tho like #4799256

00:57:061 - i think this is an intention on not following synth for a second, but i can say that it can put the LN, to express the synth which should be represent like others. (Just cut it where single note arrange start)

01:03:872 (63872|1,64521|2,64845|1) - i still confused the representing for you, between express them with LN or rice?
if you can't consider which structure that you gonna use to express it
here example
01:03:548 -

same problem [?]
01:14:899 -

01:11:656 (71656|3) - you can put 1/2 LN to emphasis vocal here

01:13:440 - till 01:14:413 - I don't agree if you use overlapping in this part, because the vocals in this part are not authentic enough to be overlapped like that.

making it as usual is more than enough because it's not in a part of the music that is authentic enough and has high intensity.

01:15:426 (75426|0) - 1/4 01:15:467 - not 1/8

01:20:088 (80088|1,80413|0,80737|3,81061|1,81386|2) - This LN for vocal right? if i'm right then...

01:21:061 (81061|1) - you need cut this into 1/2 LN because the vocal changed at 01:21:223 - not 01:21:386 -

prob like this

01:20:575 - avoid unnecessary anchors like this 01:20:088 (80088|1,80575|1,80737|1) -

I think this 01:20:575 (80575|1) - can be moved to col 4

01:26:656 (86656|0,86737|1,86899|0,86980|1,87061|0,87223|1,87386|0,87548|0) - is this intended to make it dense on left side? if not prob need rearrange again to make it balanced

01:34:845 (94845|2,94872|1) - 01:35:494 (95494|0,95494|2,95521|1) - being made like a normal chord is more than enough. I think it's too forced because in other parts you make it like a generic vocal.

It would be weird if you used this kind of precision all of a sudden.

01:53:926 (113926|2,114034|3) - It's quite strange when pressed because there are only vocals here, and also the vocals in this part are not too eccentric to be made like this

enough 01:53:656 (113656|1,114142|0,114304|3) - using this note alone is more than enough

02:03:494 (123494|1) - 1/4 should be like this

03:10:034 (190034|2) - it ends here 03:10:115 - I think it's too long if this LN is made in 1/2.

03:27:007 (207007|0,207187|1) - Sorry to bother, but when playing this, it feels way too early for the vocal, it should be at 03:27:061 and 03:27:223 (1/2 and 1/1)

I also think 00:51:332 (51332|3) - is too early and should be at 00:51:365 - (1/16)

03:27:872 - till 03:46:034 - I think the jumpstream here is too forced to use, it's just fun to press instead of presenting the music itself. especially you don't use it here 00:52:196 -

I hope you can remap this and change it like at the end of the first kiai, that's more than enough.