Natsuzora no Pentacle

00:02:203 - honestly quite enjoyable section. the LN density felt just right and wasn't overdone

00:03:320 - a bit subjective but could do a 1/1 LN on col1 as you did the stair LN earlier

00:04:357 - missed a 1/4 LN
00:23:905 - 00:23:107 - kick missed
00:25:661 - 00:26:458 - 00:27:256 - and many other instances that randomly skipped
00:30:927 - might be too much for a double imo
00:36:671 - 00:39:224 - missed kick
00:38:905 - snare missed

00:09:544 (9544|0) - could extend to 1/4 longer as a progressive pattern like 00:07:309 (7309|3,8267|1,8267|2,8267|0) -

00:13:373 - LN length and the way reverse shiled placed is kinda random
maybe you can try to emphasize the flute more with LN release

00:16:964 - can put a LN here for plute, similar was mapped at 00:11:857 -

00:17:762 (17762|2) - also sounds like ghost note and 00:18:639 - flute skip

00:18:001 - might be a nitpick thing but personally I would suggest avoiding using 4 note chords as much as possible unless it's an end to a section like 00:18:480 -

personally I would suggest 00:18:001 - 123, 00:18:480 - 234. so that it would somewhat reflect the pitch representation.

tho like i said, if you really wanna keep the 4 note chord. 00:18:480 - would be fine to keep since it would somewhat make sense (end of this section and it reflects 00:17:522 - a lil on pattern visual). and I would really encourage changing just 00:18:001 - then

00:18:799 (18799|3,18799|2,18879|0,18879|1) - minor thing but would suggest changing this to maybe 42 31 so that it's different patterning from 00:19:437 (19437|3,19437|2,19597|1,19597|0,19916|0,19916|1) - on the toms which would be a nice touch

00:22:150 (22150|0) - very minor thing but I would suggest deleting this note for better density flow into the rolls
00:21:671 (21671|3,21990|2,22150|1,22230|3,22230|2,22309|0,22349|1,22389|2) -

also complements that 00:22:230 - snare is actually louder than 00:22:150 -

00:32:203 (32203|0) - flute died 00:32:682 - so a clearer coordination might be good enough

00:37:948 (37948|0) - same but died at 00:38:267 -

section review
00:32:841 - 00:40:501 - okay I think there's a lot of things that can be improved on this section

first of all, not sure what this 00:34:597 (34597|1) - LN is representing, since it looks like you're focusing on the flute & piano here with LNs. So it might actually be a rice note instead

I feel that an issue with this section is that, the jumps in general feel very overused here. Which personally I think is overshadowing the LN patterning here (can't really feel the impact of them)

00:35:075 (35075|3) - could start the longer LN at 00:35:395 - cuz 2 different pitches

00:37:788 (37788|3) - could move to col1 to avoid weird anchor
00:40:022 (40022|0) - move to col2

00:48:001 (48001|1,48054|2,48107|3) - 02:22:468 - I dont think this sounds like 1/3

00:58:533 - would suggest to fill note here and 00:58:852 - as LN getting more dense but overall density is not, which might break the flow
00:59:650 - could map the flute here with 1/4 LN

01:06:033 - 01:36:671 - next section review time!

ok for this section, I think the LNs are lacking a bit of oomph. Like in terms of LN difficulty. The kiai section is a lot easier than the build up 00:25:182 - lol. which felt like a missed opportunity that you probably could've went for a more release type of LN pattern like what you did for 01:06:990 (66990|0,67469|1,67788|0) - .

Like it could easily be applied to sections like 01:09:862 (69862|2,70341|0) - , 01:15:288 (75288|2,75607|1) - , 01:18:479 (78479|1,78798|2,79118|0,79437|3,79756|0) - (This section especially! It's a build up! What a waste!!!)

01:08:905 (68905|0) - drag 1/4 longer for length consistency with 01:07:947 (67947|3) -
01:09:862 (69862|2) - same, can drag more for playability
01:10:820 (70820|3) - can be shorter

01:35:634 (95634|2) - seems like ghost note, also can rearrange col4 a bit better here

01:49:915 - can put a LN on col3 for flute sustain and keep the flow
01:51:192 - miss noted
01:51:431 - flute missed

02:43:053 (163053|0,163532|1,164011|2) - contrary to #4749648
I think these could be shortened to be differentiated from 02:41:617 (161617|1,161936|3,162096|2,162256|0,162415|3,163053|0,163532|1,164011|2) -

or idk, make 02:41:936 (161936|3,162096|2,162256|0,162415|3) - harder instead. There's a lot of options you can do

also I think 02:41:139 - ,02:41:298 - should be LNs?

03:03:000 (183000|3) - can move to col2 and 03:03:798 (183798|3) - to col3 to ease the anchor down

03:23:585 - subjective but there should be a jumpstream for this?

03:59:569 - I think I can only hear 3 pianoes, also the jack at col1 might get players offguard
how about doing it in 1/6