Kawaige Nai Na

00:01:278
[m-o-i] looks a bit problematic spread wise, m-o is exactly the same, and only top diff isnt exactly different

could add a note 00:02:165 at oni, and 00:01:681 + 00:02:326 on top diff for build up

00:02:568 (10,11) - D D (or any sugerence?)

00:03:374 - this is 1/6

00:09:019 ~ 00:11:277 - i feel you could vary up the patterning / rhythms here to avoid over-repeating

right now the d ddk k d pattern is repeated on 00:09:019 and 00:10:309 despite the vocals being different in both parts

the x xxx x x rhythm could also be varied since such rhythms have been heavily repeated throughout the intro (such as in 00:11:599 00:14:180 00:16:761 etc.)

maybe try doing a x x xxx x rhythm and vary the colouring so that 00:10:309 ~ 00:10:954 is varied from 00:09:019 ~ 00:09:987? here's an example you could try: (first note on 00:09:019)

00:13:857 - definisher this for no drum crash, like with the other diffs?

00:15:067 - prefer triplet at 00:14:987 (86,87) over 00:15:309 (88,89,90), compare 00:16:761

00:15:551 00:15:712 - add notes in consistency with 00:18:051 00:20:632?

00:21:599 ~ 00:23:857 - might be nice to add some improv here. current, though with dropped intensity, feels a bit too sharp. would bump density here but not as much as previous part

00:23:696 - add?

00:24:341 - this section is too dense

would remove some blue tick pattern around here 00:24:583 00:25:551 00:26:196 for example

remove notes on 00:29:825 (184) and 00:30:148 (186) to futfill the "tai tai tai" vocal like:
k ddk k K K K

00:36:277 (222,223,224,225) - could add more notes here since it's top diff and mostly same as Oni
adding kat on 00:36:357 is best i think

00:38:938 - maybe you could emphasise the snare / tom rhythm that appears here:

• move 00:38:938 to the drum on 00:38:616
• could even keep the 1/1 rhythm at 00:38:857 ~ 00:39:180 to emphasise the snare / tom rhythm

don't forget to adjust svs here, see #4859159

00:39:341 - i think you can be a bit more creative with the improv here instead of just spamming triplets

something i'd suggest:

240 - 00:39:341

266 - 00:42:244

00:53:534 00:56:115 01:01:276 - these 7-plets are very dense

i understand you're trying to create progression by making 00:49:663 ~ 01:02:566 more dense than 00:14:180 ~ 00:27:083, but the latter section is arguably similar to the tensity of the former section (it's mostly the guitar rhythm that changes in the outro)

thus i feel having 7-plets is kinda misrepresenting the tensity in the outro

deleting 00:53:937 00:56:518 01:01:679 would still preserve the progression in difficulty compared to 00:14:180 ~ 00:27:083 without overdoing the improv imo

00:57:566 - could add to follow the guitar, consistent with what you did on 00:22:083?

01:05:254 - the 1/3 sound at end you've used actually starts here. add 1/3 d

01:05:523 - should be moved to 01:05:416 if you're following the guitar here

add a sv on 01:05:792 and put the volume on 5%