Rebuff

00:05:994 - 00:06:744, 00:09:087 - 00:09:931, 00:11:994 - 00:12:556, 00:13:494 - 00:14:224, 00:14:994 - 00:15:744 (etc) You've missed sound here (a piano sound) which, (in my opinion) could be mapped. This feels empty to play without the piano being mapped as it feels I'm playing only half of what the song is trying to deliver through the intro.

00:11:994 (11994|3) - you could move this to col3 and 00:12:017 (12017|0) - to col4 to better represent the pitch change and also you could make 00:20:056 (20056|2) - 00:20:994 (20994|2) - as doubles since they're really prominent sounds :p

00:25:587 (25587|1,25681|0,25775|2,25869|0,25962|1,26056|2,26150|1) - extend this pattern to 00:26:525 cuz those sounds (idk what to call them lol) end there

00:36:462 (36462|2,36556|1) - these are a different pitch from 00:36:181 (36181|2,36275|1), it would be cool if you rearranged them :D

00:42:931 - i think you should continue with the jumpstream pattern you were using here. Maybe something like this: https://gyazo.com/0e410eb26718e6fb88aa3d2869e3c26c

00:43:306 - igual que en la dificultad anterior a esta, puedes usar un doble acá y una nota aquí 00:43:494 -
02:28:306 - lo mismo acá

00:44:056 - tbh you missed the opportunity to represent this drum part that introduces 00:44:994. perhaps you could make something like this https://gyazo.com/3b5ff5641e6a41e43555d20ad194d44b ì

00:48:462 (48462|0,48697|1,48978|2,49212|0,49306|1,49634|2,49869|0) - what are you representing with these?? vocals?? those distortion sounds??? explain pls :p

00:55:869 - 00:58:869 - 01:04:869 - 01:07:869 - in these parts you completely ignored i would say a pretty important sound that you previously represented as 00:53:619 (53619|0,53665|1,53712|2,53759|3,53806|0,53853|1,53900|2,53947|3) - any reason to justify this?

the LN which starts at 01:02:806 needs to be extended to start on the blue line (01:02:712) as the sound you're mapping starts there.

01:03:744 (63744|1,63744|2,63837|3,63884|2,63931|0,63931|1) - this pattern is different from the others like 01:04:119 (64119|0,64119|3,64212|1,64259|2,64306|0,64306|3) - and so on. By different i mean that the doubles don't align, fix it please :3

01:08:244 (68244|1,68244|3,68244|2,68244|0) - this quad feels exaggerated. Wanna make it as a triple since its the same sound as 01:05:244 (65244|1,65244|3,65244|2) (that was represented as a triple) :P

01:20:853 (80853|3,80853|2) - Ctrl + H this since its the same pitch as 01:20:712 (80712|1,80712|0) -

01:22:681 (82681|2,82806|1,82931|2,83025|1) - i feel like this representation for this sound could've been done better, here's a pretty accurate example: https://gyazo.com/71fb65b912d9539387759a819bc6c4d2

01:32:994 (92994|3) - how about moving this to col2 since its the same piano key as 01:32:806 (92806|1) and maybe move 01:33:017 (93017|0) - to col3

01:36:744 (96744|3,96790|2,96837|1) - this is for sure NOT a triple grace, please remove 01:36:837 (96837|1) -

01:42:744 (102744|3,102744|1) - 01:43:494 (103494|2,103494|3) - you can make these as triples since they're the same piano sound as 01:41:994 (101994|1,101994|0,101994|3) -

Missing note 01:44:994

01:53:994 - 02:05:994 i see you're using LNs to emphasize the melody here, but you seem to have missed some in these places: 01:54:275 - 01:54:556 - 01:54:744 - 01:55:025 - 01:57:275 - 02:00:275 - 02:00:556 - 02:00:744 - 02:01:025 (remove 02:01:119 (121119|0)) - 02:01:306 - 02:02:431 - 02:03:275

02:05:806 (125806|3,125806|2,125806|0) - why is this a triple? there's no particular sound/kick here so you can make it a double + LN

02:05:994 - 02:17:994 - are you sure you don't wanna keep going with the pattern you were using before? where u used LNs to represent the melody? (don't use doubles + lns since there's no space for them, just use single lns :p)

02:23:337 (143337|3,143337|2) - Ctrl + H this cuz its the same kick as 02:23:244 (143244|0,143244|1) -

on 02:34:494, 02:41:994, 02:49:494 and on 02:56:994 there's the same "vocal" sound that you represented as double LNs (for example here 02:36:486 (156486|0,156486|1) etc.) Why not making these LN's too?

02:34:494 - 02:56:994 in this section how about using singles to represent this particular type of kick (for example at 02:34:650 (154650|1,154650|2) - and so on) and also utilizing the double LN's to emphasize the vocals (or whatever u call taht sound)? it should look something like this (i'll link a few examples): 02:34:494 - https://gyazo.com/cc60eabd7073cbc21e3168f1c622aab0, 02:36:369 - https://gyazo.com/b7a2b587c16bc20d40495a29eaea3d67, 02:38:244 - https://gyazo.com/3751a8cff8a5b2aeac90691aac7f3591, 02:41:994 - https://gyazo.com/92b68c5a192176c814ea77575d19b4a3 and so on. keep going with this pattern

02:36:837 (156837|3,156954|3,157072|3) - doesnt seem an intentional 3 note anchor cuz it just appear once, so i suggest to move 02:36:954 (156954|3) - to col 3

02:38:244 (158244|3,158361|3) - 02:51:369 (171369|0,171486|0) - 02:53:244 (173244|2,173361|2) - any reason to make minijack with those? cuz the idea seemed to avoid minijack on those spots like 02:43:869 02:45:744, etc. I think its better to change it for playability sake

02:47:619 (167619|0,167736|1,167970|2) - how about on conveting this into Lns? i think they deserve it since synth is played

like this

02:49:025 maybe make it quad like u did with 02:41:525? the places where vocals are played are kinda inconsistent, like the Ln at 02:56:290 (176290|2) - which isnt used in previous iterations

You could map the breathy sound which starts at 03:05:806 with ln so this break section isn't so empty. (in my opinion adds better to the outro).

03:13:087 (193087|1,193275|0) - these are missplaced, put them on the yellow line please