00:13:144 (1) - could map this actively or make 00:13:301 (2) - a circle or something
00:23:301 (1) - etc, would highlight the drums more imo
00:13:301 (1,1) - remove these ncs and add on 00:13:613 (2) - instead, makes way more sense that way for guitar
00:23:144 (1,1,1) - ncs are inconsistent with 00:13:144 (1,2,3) - when the song is basically doing the same thing. do one or the other (both are fine), but not this
00:28:769 (1) - this should be truncated to a 1/6 slider to follow the song more accurately https://qtvx.s-ul.eu/PfYhYgeE
01:00:801 (4) - could space this to have the same type of emphasis you had on snares the entire part
01:05:176 (1,2,3,4) - vs 01:07:676 (1,2,3,4) - make rhythm consistent here the 3/4 placement is kinda random
well if ur going double 3/4 then also make the spacing readable on 01:05:176 (1,2,3) - by lowering it like u do after
01:18:926 (1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4) - ncs here make little sense, 01:18:926 (1) - is part of the previous musical phrase and the differentiation between parts does not begin until 01:19:082 (2) -. I think following these new combos would make more sense https://qtvx.s-ul.eu/sbJ0VAqc
01:24:551 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - having this increase in spacing when the only instrument you're following is the drums and those are decreasing in pitch/intensity doesn't make sense to me, i think it should progress the other way here (go from big to small spacing)