VYSE mapped by Usagi_‬ · beatmap discussion‬ | ‭osu!‬

beatmap discussion

0

mapped by Usagi_

submitted 27 Sep 2024

ranked 22 Nov 2024

This beatmap was ranked on 22 November 2024!

nominated by Maxus and Chrisse

New Discussion

Please sign in to post or reply

Discussions

00:13:477

00:13:477 - should have double imo, its same as 00:11:234 - and 00:15:720 - etc

4 months ago

added ty

4 months ago

Marked as resolved by Usagi_

00:17:403

00:17:403 - imo this emphasis better have double notes here

5 months ago

01:11:234 - too

5 months ago

True

5 months ago

Marked as resolved by Usagi_

00:24:692

considering u have triple every 1/2 here i think 00:24:692 - would be nice as triple a well even though there is 1/8 pattern
example

4 months ago

01:18:524 - same if agree

4 months ago

Followed suggestion ty

4 months ago

Marked as resolved by Usagi_

00:26:094

00:26:094 (26094|3,26141|1,26188|2,26234|3) - if you want to dump the vocal, it's better to make it just straight 1-2-3-4 there. dump with the minijack at 00:26:094 (26094|3,26234|3) - doesn't fit with the fact that the vocal is straightforward with just with me

5 months ago

01:19:926 - the same

5 months ago

Oky

5 months ago

Marked as resolved by Usagi_

00:26:375

00:26:375 (26375|2,26515|0) - Also, if you decide to dump the previous vocal to 1/12, this one also needs to be dumped there. Otherwise it is inconsistent to dump one vocal only to not dump the others.

dump this to 1/12 as well.

5 months ago

made me vocal dump too, thanks!

5 months ago

Marked as resolved by Usagi_

00:30:020

considering how u structure youre jacks in the section i think it would be better to avoid 00:30:020 (30020|2,30160|3,30160|2,30300|3,30300|2,30440|3) - having two 3-note jacks on the same hand like this

could try for example?

4 months ago

cool

4 months ago

Marked as resolved by Usagi_

00:47:823

[subjective]

for these longer jacks here 00:47:823 - they seem to follow a repeated vocal similar to 00:48:945 - for exmaple, but for 00:46:702 (46702|0,46702|1,46842|1,46842|0,46982|0,46982|1) - , 00:46:702 - doesnt seem to have the vocal so have about emphasising it more by moving 00:46:702 (46702|0) - to col 3 separating it from 00:46:842 (46842|1,46842|0,46982|0,46982|1) - similar to 00:45:861 -

example

4 months ago

The vocals are too similar qwq, fixed

4 months ago

Marked as resolved by Usagi_

01:11:515

01:11:515 (71515|1,71515|3,71608|2,71702|1) - wrong snap?

5 months ago

I realized it was 1/8 after listening closely. Thank you!

5 months ago

Marked as resolved by Usagi_

01:53:150

01:53:150 - vs 01:54:272 - they are the same so maybe would be nice making the patterning the same?

4 months ago

yes, fixed

4 months ago

Marked as resolved by Usagi_

/

›

›

›

›