Aci-L

00:03:161 (3,1) - 00:04:642 (3,1) - 00:06:124 (3,1) - 00:09:087 (5,1) - 00:10:569 (5,1) - unsure if these are meant to be dashes or walks as you have 00:07:605 (3,1) - as a dash.

00:10:569 (5) - This should be a repeat slider for consistency sake. EX) 00:04:642 (3) , 00:07:605 (3)

00:12:420 (1,1) - at least 250ms between end of spinner and next notes, Current only 185ms.
So, should move the end of spinner to 00:13:531.

With the way it is hitsounded, having 00:19:087 (2) - as a same direction walk feels a bit awkward to play. I think ctrl+h and moving it out by 1.5x away from 00:18:346 (1) - play better and compliments the hitsounding more.

00:23:253 - 00:23:809 - missing notes here?

00:25:383 (3) - Feels a bit hard to catch for a platter diff. Just making the slider a straight repeat slider would be better here imo.

00:25:753 (1,1,1,1) - I would make these dashes to be consistent with the previous long slider section you had here 00:13:901 (1,1,1) - as 00:25:753 (1,1,1,1) - imo is musically more intense than 00:13:901 (1,1,1) -

00:31:679 (1,2) - current the pattern doesn't follow the piano(?). The more louder piano sound hit on 00:31:772 & 00:32:049 & 00:32:327 respectively.
So, the rhythm should be like this

00:35:012 (2) - Changing the rhythm into what I suggest here is strongly suggested. I can hear the buzz noises that you went for on 00:32:142 (2) and 00:33:624 (2), but on 00:35:012 (2) it is barely audible. If I were you I would just map the main melody rather than the small buzzes throughout the sections 00:31:679 ~ 00:35:383.

00:40:012 ~ 00:46:308 - Confused on the usages of 1/4 stream here such as 00:45:938 (4,5,6,7,8). I understand 00:40:012 (4,5,6,7,8) getting a stream as you can hear the trill noises in the bg. Trills noises are audible on 00:43:161, but isn't used. 00:44:457 (4,5,6) also is ignoring the trills. I would try to be more consistent on the 1/4 in this section.

00:48:809 (1,2) - any reason why this is a dash?

It feels a bit off having 01:10:198 (1,2) - a lot closer together than 01:01:309 (1,2) - 01:02:790 (1,2) - and other patterns on that same sound

01:10:568 (2,1) - A dash would fit between these as there is a large cymbal noise here.

01:12:235 (2,3) - dash distance between these is pretty brutal, if you use similar distances as this pls look onto reducing them to like 2.5x or something

01:18:253 (3,1) - here are at 2.49x spacing. I suggest having a spacing like 01:16:772 (3,1) - and here 01:21:216 (3,1) - to prevent any possible ambiguity in distance recognition for platter players

01:21:679 (5,6) - I'd personally make the end of the stream a bit more flowy towards the hyperdash, in order to avoid the stop&go: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/18836375/b14a

01:32:790 (2,3) - A antiflow into a higher-snapped dash is way too hard. Would just make these flow.

02:00:568 (1,2) - this walk distance seems bigger than other walk suddenly. Reduce a bit to ~1.1x

02:12:049 (3,4,5) - 1.4x is slighty fat for me. I would suggest reduce a bit to ~1.0-1.1x.

02:21:309 (1,2,3) - the piano doesn't strong here and 02:21:864 (2,3) - pretty strong cymbals. So, u put dash on 02:21:309 (1,2) - and 02:21:864 (2,3) - walk it seems not make sense to me.

I suggest 02:21:309 (1,2) - walk + 02:21:864 (2,3) - hyper, which is better emphasize each sound. Also good for build up.

02:21:864 (2,3) - Would it be possible to make these equidistant for aesthetics?

02:23:531 (4,5) - build up and emphasizing can be better here if u make dash here. (4,5) dash -> (5,1) hyper.

02:23:531 (4) - Would remove the clap here at the end of this slider. Sounds very random and wasn't used for quite a while.