mapped by richardfeder
submitted
ranked
This beatmap was ranked on 29 June 2023!
nominated by MadBricktree and Ilham
New Discussion
Please sign in to post or reply
Discussions
Sort by

00:00:463 (463|2,671|3) - I think you can just stack these like in the top diff. You have plenty of anchors even in this diff anyway so it's not gonna be too hard.

permalink

sure thing

permalink
Marked as resolved by richardfeder

00:12:129 (12129|0,12129|5,12129|2,12129|1,12129|4,12129|6) - Since I'm very noob on LN, I cannot recognize rhythm easily about these LNs' end. I think it'll be better expressing vocal rhythm same as Love+ difficulty for intuition, or you can nerf vocal rhythm from Love+.

permalink

If you have certain reason(maybe effect sound?), feel free to ignore this suggestion :)

permalink

yeah, they kind of lined up to the fading effect sounds here. It would be great if I can do the same as Love+, but I figured that might be a bit too much for players at this level.

permalink
Marked as resolved by richardfeder

00:14:213 (14213|2,14213|1) - I think you should move this into the other hand if you're trying to emphasize the synths with stacked short LN doubles at 00:13:796 (13796|2,13796|1,14004|1,14004|2). Having the double here undermines the emphasis you have on the synths.

Same applies to 00:15:879, 00:17:546, etc

permalink

legit. The shield was a bad decision.

permalink
Marked as resolved by richardfeder

00:16:088 (16088|4,16088|5,16504|5,16504|4) - nudge one column right? This is the only case where you have the longer synths on the same columns as the shorter doubles prior and it's not like the synths are the same pitch here.

permalink

sure

permalink
Marked as resolved by richardfeder

00:17:716 (17716|6,17820|4,18133|6,18237|4) - this is kinda nitpick, seems you only use exact pattern only on this synth, I guess you can make them different especially since this sounds 00:18:133 (18133|6,18237|4) is weaker imo

if you don't want to make this counter-flow here maybe you can try this?

00:44:383 (44383|6,44487|4,44800|6,44904|4) - while here is okay coz pattern at this section using all exact pattern 00:41:050 (41050|5,41154|4,41466|5,41570|4) - 00:42:716 (42716|2,42820|1,43133|2,43237|1) -

this also applied on later section like 01:34:383 - and etc, I think guess it's better to have consistent structure in this kind of section

permalink

Cool. I rearrange all parts so that there's no repeat pattern to force reading, except the first group in the intro part of the song (I will keep that simple since it is the beginning of the song).

permalink
Marked as resolved by richardfeder

00:28:654 (28654|4) - I personally think it's abit awkward to have this stacked with 00:28:862 (28862|4,29070|4,29279|4,29487|4) coz here is vocal that doesn't seems to be included into the instrument you layer, I suggest to move this into col6 |1~7|

permalink

yes

permalink
Marked as resolved by richardfeder

00:52:129 ~ 00:52:963 - I can get the slight speedup + 0.1x SV here as it basically makes a slowjam stutter at basically emptiness but the SVs at 00:52:963 ~ 00:53:692 - is really awkward as it is interrupted by a bunch of notes.

Having the slowjam gradually speed up starting 00:52:963 is really weird as well as it makes 00:52:963 ~ 00:53:171 - significantly wider than previous 1/2 SV gaps. The fact that the 1/16 speedup here is nearly twice as that of 00:52:129 doesn't help either. At the very least, you should have the gradual speedup start at 00:53:171 instead of at 00:52:963.

permalink

My personal recommendation is the following:

52129,-1000,4,2,1,30,0,0
52311,-50,4,2,1,30,0,0
52338,-1000,4,2,1,30,0,0
52520,-50,4,2,1,30,0,0
52546,-1000,4,2,1,30,0,0
52728,-50,4,2,1,30,0,0
52754,-1000,4,2,1,30,0,0
52936,-50,4,2,1,30,0,0
52963,-1000,4,2,1,30,0,0
53145,-50,4,2,1,30,0,0
53171,-200,4,2,1,30,0,0
53275,-66.6666666666667,4,2,1,30,0,0
53379,-100,4,2,1,30,0,0
permalink

did something very similar to yours. Remove the sped up part. It should be quite straight forward now. I don't expect anyone to just sightread it at first go, but it should be very manageable with music now

permalink
Marked as resolved by richardfeder

02:12:091 - should apply here as well

permalink
Reopened by MadBricktree

(on the higher diff oops reopened the wrong post)

permalink

For a second I thought my update didn't go through lol. Yeap this looked updated with a jump to replace the weird speed up already. I am closing this for now. Let me know if you find anything else that needs to be changed

permalink
Marked as resolved by richardfeder

01:04:421 - the jacks here aren't hard but you only have like two other sections in the entire diff with jacks. I think you should use something trilly instead of minijacks.

The same applies to 02:24:421 and 02:31:921.

permalink

that was what I have before, but looking at the chart as a whole I feel like this is the part where mini jack fits and as a theme of this set I think they are appropriate here. I wish I can give myself more reasons to insert jacks here and there to balance things out, but tbh I think other parts are fine without it and I also don't see this as too awkwardly standing out.

permalink
Marked as resolved by richardfeder

01:31:296 - a bit underwhelming here imo. I can see that you tried to differentiate this section from other similar drum sections like 00:51:296 as it lacks the background synth buildup but I think the trill here is way too simple and easy.

permalink

sure. Was something harder and I think that is the way to go

permalink
Marked as resolved by richardfeder

01:58:588 (118588|6) - move to col 4(or other col) to avoid triple stack on col 7

permalink

yes, rearrange a bit to avoid stack

permalink
Marked as resolved by richardfeder

02:03:758 - the echo vocals you layer with LN shield on col1 and col7 still continue by the way, I guess you can still layer it 1 more beat

02:10:425 - while here is okay since you change the layering here into the kick sound

permalink

That was my first idea, but I rejected that since extra notes over emphasize that white line, but the song doesn't actually sound that hard. It was just a usual beat. Combining shield and 4 notes makes it plays really weird imo so I didn't do that.

permalink
Marked as resolved by richardfeder

03:20:425 - i think the SV could have a fade in here, not just a sudden change, similar to how u have a fade out for 03:26:050 - part, it could be smoother, there's plenty of space to introduce the slow part gradually instead of 1.0x -> 0.6x

permalink

I could, but fade in here feels way less impactful and doesn't do the job of highlighting the contrast here. The bridge section is a lot quieter and less dense, and that drop is sudden, not gradual.

And it is a pretty hard diff, I think being nice is optional here. In fact 03:26:050 used to have no fade in at all but since the music does not change as dramatic there, I ended up adding a fade in. I don't think that applies here

permalink

ok

permalink
Marked as resolved by Drum-Hitnormal

03:45:425 (225425|3,225633|2,225841|1,226050|0,226258|1) - does it really need to be one handed? just asking because I think when Love+ using two handed pattern so this might be needs more finger coordination than the two handed pattern

permalink

I think it doesn't matter, unless someone has DT mod on (and if they can play DT I also don't think this is ever going to be a problem...) but OK, I put them on both hands.

permalink
Marked as resolved by richardfeder
/