00:08:037 (8,9,10,11,1) - could add more spacing for these because they are much stronger sounds than all the triples before which are same spaced. would make up for better contrast between the patterns
01:24:900 (1,1) - these are too far spaced considering its 1/6 rhythm gap. since you never used 1/6 gaps before, you should make those objects overlap each other to indicate the dense rhythmical gap
01:33:312 (1,2,3,4,5) - Im not exactly sure but I assume you intended to emphasize the vocals here, however the vocal lands on 01:33:537 - and not on any 1/3 tick which makes this pattern as a whole miss-representative as a whole. additionally, 01:33:412 (2) - has no sound at all in the music and the other audible sounds are all different which does not call for making them all the same with just circles. i strongly recommend to re-consider the pattern and the rhythm to represent the song in a better way. could do something like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/18332946/fa0d if you wanna represent the vocals
01:53:712 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - could add more spacing for these because their rhythmical gap is much bigger with the 2/3 than the usual 1/3 that is being used for this kind of visual spacing before
02:38:922 (2,1,1) - its visually spaced the same, but the rhythms are different 1/2 and 1/4. put the middle slider more up so the 1/4 becomes less spaced and the 1/2 more spaced. currently its very missleading