Is there any reason why you stacked 00:11:123 (3,4) - and 00:23:048 (3,4) - 1/1 rythm, but you stacked here 01:37:023 (6,7) - 1/2 rythm?
I would suggest spacing those two 01:37:023 (6,7) - like those two 01:36:464 (5,6) - for more readability / consistancy
00:35:719 (4) - feels very underwhelming to hav these noticeable vocals on the same 1/1 slider that really slow vocals at 00:33:856 (1,2) - were just mapped on. could turn into two circles to emphasise the vocals that stand out here
I would suggest changing new combo from 00:57:706 (1) - slider to 00:57:520 (8) - circle to prevent reading (8) as a 1/1 rythm (spacing is ok but i think it would be more readable with the nc change)
01:16:526 (5) - , 01:28:452 (5) - putting standalone 1/2 sliders followed by a 1/1 gap is not disallowed, but strongly discouraged due to being hard to read for new players, who tend to misinterpret the 3/2 gap in active rhythm (which visually looks like a 1/1 gap). you could just replace these sliders with 1/2 doubles, which plays more intuitively
for 01:22:489 (6) - you could add a circle followed by a 1/2 slider on the white tick, to also passively catch the vocal on 01:22:862
01:23:793 (2,3) - doesnt feel like it represents the fast vocal + held vocal that well if you have a held note followed by just a circle. maybe change to https://i.imgur.com/LX9QwX0.png which more accurately represents each vocal here?