00:01:275 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - this really feels like a "throwaway" pattern in the sense that you sorta just put it right at the start of the map and then nothing else really plays like it, would suggest restyling this pattern to make it more in line with what you do later in the map
00:04:441 (4,1,2,3,4) - this pattern looks/feels really clunky due to the square patterning starting before the downbeat @ 00:04:608 (1) - , would adjust the spacing of 00:04:608 (1) - to be equidistant to 00:04:274 (3,4) -
00:16:607 - can't quite identify the reason why but there doesn't really feel like an appropriate decrease in intensity between phrases here, I believe the spacing between 00:16:607 (1,2,1,2,3) - feels disproportionately large for what should be a pretty noticeable drop in intensity from the last section
00:36:774 (2,3,1,2,3,4) - I think it's better if you could split them into 3 note + 4 note (so 00:36:774 (2,3,1) - be a group and 00:37:274 (2,3,4,5) - be another group) by readjusting the placements & NCing, cuz that's how the song goes
right now it looks like 2 + 5
01:25:274 (1,2) - you should just spam drum hs (clap) to these cuz you're actually mapping to drums. having no drum-related hs feels out of place
01:25:940 (1) - worth adding a soft whistle cuz that bling sound there
03:23:940 (1,2,3,4,5) - could add some hs cuz there's no such streamy sound in the music so some more feedback from the objects itself would be nice
00:54:607 (3) - most likely a replacement for 2 circles as here 01:05:274 (4,5) - would be helpful, it will convey vocals better
01:25:274 (1,2,3,4,5) - to be honest, I don't see the need for it. better focus on vocal 1/2 because it comes to the fore. these drums 1/4 are practically inaudible, when you play it will be significantly felt
01:36:274 (1,2,3) - this is very tiny but they're not equal spacing (DS says they're the same but (3) has a slow down so the actually distance r still different) and that's a bit ugly :(((
03:07:940 (1,2,3) - can u make them equal spacing
i honestly would suggest to move (1) farther from 03:07:274 (1,2,3,4) - but if u rly insist on keeping the ds between 03:07:774 (4,1) - then i guess u have to move 03:08:107 (2,3) -
03:12:607 (1) - could u make it not slightly overlapped by 03:11:940 (5) - 's body it's like 1px overlapped
01:50:607 (1,2) - would be cool to unstack this and do a pattern like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/17163300/ef72 to give vocal a bit more emphasis
03:08:107 (2,3) - rotate this a bit so triangle looks nicer, like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/17163307/027b
01:33:940 - worth adding a clap tho cuz this basically has the same sound as 01:34:607 (2) -
04:04:774 (1,2,1,2,1) - worth adding claps (or something heavy enough) cuz music sounds r strong enough
03:48:940 (1,2) - merge them to a 1/2 slider would be better, since i assume you group 03:49:274 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - by 4, which makes 03:48:940 (1,2) - not grouped (and that's kinda pointless)
changing them to a 1/2 means to group it with 03:48:607 (6) - and i personally think that pretty much fits with the music + also fit with how you group notes during this section as well
04:06:774 (4) - separate this to 2 1/4 sliders? 04:06:940 - has a kick sound
this would probably break the aes of 04:05:940 (1,2,3,4,1) - though