00:18:061 (1) - could pull this slightly outwards from 00:15:628 (4) - so they do not touch
00:18:872 (3,4,5) - The visual spacing is quite confusing because the visual space is even but the rhythm space is not. May consider pulling 00:20:088 (4) - upwards to 85,103 (or even higher) so there's a small jump tgt followed by an anti-jump (or you could reverse the order)
00:23:800 (1,2,3,4) - could increase the spacing - although I appreciate that you (probably) reduced the spacing because the song is slowing, the combined effect of reduced spacing and the reducing bpm is that it feels unduly slow compared to 00:22:115 (1,2,3,4) - ; I think keeping these at 0.85x is fine since it flows more naturally according to the song itself but 0.8x also works for me personally
00:28:604 (1) - Would recommend raising the volume on this a bit, pretty hard to hear right now
00:38:851 (3,1) - could soften the curve of 00:38:851 (3) - and make it point slightly away so they do not overlap (perhaps consider making them parallel)
00:54:838 (1,2,3) - I could perhaps appreciate that this is sort of a "trick" compared to 00:53:950 (2,3) - . It's readable but I think it does not look very consistent. May consider stacking 00:55:233 (2,3) - and moving them to say 359,312 like you did with 01:04:706 (2,3) -
01:04:706 (2,3) - can also pull slightly away from 01:04:312 (1) - with necessary adjustment to notes following
Made 00:53:950 (2,3) Very close together like similar patterns in the map so they are definitely read as 1/4; Also stacked 00:55:233 (2,3) together.
01:15:956 (10,1) - Might be nice to space this out more so that it isn't misread as being 1/2 rhythm.
01:20:693 (7,1) - again I think the spacing is unclear. May either make it (slightly) overlap with 01:20:693 (7) - and go for an anti-jump, or pull it away - like what you did with 01:15:956 (10,1) -
Pulled 01:21:088 (1,2,3,4) to the second quadrant of the screen so the spacing is there between 01:20:693 (7,1).
01:27:206 (7,8) - the overlap tho :( ; I would personally make it like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/16438506/10ce but that's my poor mapping style so dont trust it too much, or just pull it away, etc.
原来后面的kiai也没有音效
先用D:C1的finish和clap铺垫一下吧 00:54:838 - 像这段 具体细节你来定
我也不太会下音效;w;
01:34:904 (1,2) - I'd space this further from 01:34:706 (4) to emphasize the loud sounds present within this moment of the song
01:39:640 (7) - and 01:44:377 (4) - ; I think variation is fine (I was criticized, heavily and perhaps justifiably, for repeating too much in my own maps) but i guess having something to click on big white lines (like how you dealt with 01:32:733 (1) - ) is generally better for a clear rhythm - may consider having 2 circles instead; ALSO I would suggest you making it consistent by making 01:34:904 (1,2) - also like 01:39:640 (7) -
At 01:32:733 (1,2,3) the pattern follows the piano melody so it is as it is; Thank you for reminding me about the sliders at 01:39:640 (7) and 01:44:377 (4): Since they represent the same pattern in the percussion, I changed all of them (in the 2nd and 3rd Kiai as well) to a similar shape; At 01:34:904 (1,2,3,4) I personally would keep it as it is to follow the piano.
01:39:640 (7) - I'd make this rhythm like https://somehero.s-ul.eu/isSWkjGU because making the first strong sound active and the second passive feels off
It also goes against the rhythm established 01:34:904 (1,2)
01:44:180 (3,4) - I'd also move this rhythm a half beat forward then add a circle so you catch the active strong sounds and piano
applies to this as well 01:49:114 (4) (also check later kiais if you make this change)
This is an excellent point, however I've decided to change all the consecutive two drum beat patterns into sliders for consistency, as the majority of the beatmap already have it in that manner. (such as 01:49:114 (4)) I understand that my choices are not exactly what you are looking for, but I hope you could understand my view.
02:26:022 - This pause seems unnecessary here I think you could add another reverse arrow here and then 02:26:219 (2) - Remove the reverse arrow to this slider. And let it start here 02:26:417 -
I would partially agree, but I changed it like 02:34:312 (1,2) and 02:36:680 (1,2) so each sliderhead correspond to the strongest sound on guitar (every 3/2 beat), and for consistency.
I personally would not make a NC here: the change in combo at this particular section like these sliders 02:22:469 (1,1) and 02:28:193 (7,1) correspond to change in chord progression. Therefore I made 02:26:812 (3) closer to the 2 and 4 such that the rhythmic spacing between the 1 and 2 are distinguishable.
02:27:206 - I tend to think that big white lines should be clickable in general, but considering that you left 02:26:022 - i think it is also possible to leave this empty so as to emphasize the rhythm. (if you indeed leave it empty you may want to make some changes to 02:27:404 (1) - onward to make the spacing clear
I agree. Changed the reverse slider to normal at 02:26:812 (3) and added a hit-circle at 02:27:206 (4) which overlaps the consecutive slider.
02:42:897 (6) - This note is not necessary, personally I do not hear any sound there. I recommend to remove it.
I agree. This would also comply with 02:54:838 (7,8,9,10) which already follow the pattern you've suggested. Did the changes.
02:50:890 (1,2,3,4) - Please make them complete blankets (something like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/16438544/68cf but you could definitely do better than I did)
03:23:654 (8) - could pull upwards to 120,182 since it would be better to have the jump at 03:24:048 (1) - instead (it also looks nicer)
I would disagree. I did this intentionally despite it being the same sound as 01:34:312 (2,3,4,5) where I did only stream of 3. This pattern would also follow for the same sounds in the 2nd and 3rd Kiai like 03:46:943 (8,9,10,11,12,13)
I don't see a problem with these sliders, as they follow the music, and whereas 03:42:798 (11) emphasizes the drum sounds, similar to the other parts in the map like 03:52:272 (10)
I would keep it as it is, because it does correspond to the piano. Although 03:40:331 (12) does not correpsond to a sound, it is for the variation of patterns, like 03:49:312 (6,7,8,9,10,11) too.
04:43:378 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - , 04:48:407 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - These patterns are nice
04:44:845 (7,8,9,10,11) - may consider NC since the gap between 04:44:425 (6,1) - is not immediately obvious. Personally I would overlap the start of these with 04:44:845 (1) - (partially like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/16438552/02a3) but the issue with that is notelocking and also it looks clumsy. I think your way probably works better anyway
I would disagree and keep the pattern as right now, and I won't put a NC here: 04:44:845 (7,8,9,10,11) is essentially a repetition of 04:43:378 (1,2,3,4,5,6) but without the first note; and there is not change in chord progression, therefore I won't add NC. Similar for 04:48:407 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11). I understand your ideas but I want to keep them as it is.