00:04:205 (4,5) - Really not a fan of how this overlaps or plays. Please move 5 in a way where it doesn't overlap
00:06:902 (4,5,6) - Usually stacks like these indicate a 3 1/4 notes, this isn't really intuitive for sightreading.
00:06:902 (4,5,6) - Instead of having these spread out I would set them up the same way you have 00:01:509 (3,4,5) -
I think it's fine, since the vocals are a bit different. It sounds like she's saying this without stopping but the example you gave it sounds like she is starting something new.
00:11:621 (1,2) - In my opinion, these should be 1 slider, it flows better since your following the wind instrument (flute/whistle). I can understand if you wish to leave as is.
00:12:295 (4,1,2,3) - What are you even following here? Avoid following too many things at once, this is a hard diff after all.
00:13:306 (5,6) - These succession of sliders really do not look good, nor do they play or flow well. You probably want something that flows more the succession of sliders at 00:17:183 (2,3).
00:15:329 (3,4) - While i like wave sliders, the transition into it is not pleasing to look at, and the wave slider also looks too sharp for one of its size.
00:15:497 (4) - the slider end should be a new slider, following the bass makes no sense since you were following the flute up until that point.
00:16:340 (2,3) - while I can definitely see you want to emphasize the downbeat after, the acute angle formed just doesn't look good imo. maybe something more like this? http://prntscr.com/tojz7l
I think i'll keep it.I'm not all about aesthetics. The previous points you made i fixed them because it also is related to flow too.
00:18:531 (2,3,4,5) - I'd personally fix this up and Ctrl+Shift+D to make a clean looking box jump, as shown here. http://prntscr.com/tojk9z
00:20:722 (1,2,3,1,2) - Snap the sliderends to the second 1/3 in each beat bc that's where the next sound is
00:21:059 (2,3,1) - Really ugly overlap. I'd really move 2 or rework the positions of all the sliders in this part.
00:21:059 (2,1) - These sliders shouldn't overlap as it could cause a misread. Please adjust the flow of these sliders.
00:25:273 (3,4,5) - This sharp turnaround also doesn't look good and could really be reworked. Some patterns are commly used because they work, and I suggest using something else, like simply rotating a slider 90 degrees
00:29:318 (2,3,4,5) - these would definitely look better if you used the shape tool and desgined this more like either one of the 2 pics below:
Triangles: http://prntscr.com/tok8d0
90 Degree... jump things?: http://prntscr.com/tok8m0
00:31:172 (5) - this and the slider end before it is the same sound as 00:32:351 (3) , yet you mapped them differently, I suggest making them the same as to not cause confusion.