I'm in the side

nah, like how it plays plus i would have to change many other parts like this

1

same here 01:54:468 -

nah, i dislike doing that in a hard. it can be more difficult than just constant notes, besides, the density is less than other parts with more 1/1 and reverses so imo works fine

1

changed to something different

1

same 02:10:468 - 03:19:802 - that way you'd have a more distinct increase in intensity in the buildups

nah, feel 1/2 sliders would be unnecessary and too difficult for a hard diff
and I get what you mean, the way i tried to show the buildup is by increasing spacing slightly, but it can be difficult to do that with a hard diff.

1

k then keeping rhythm you should at least have some kind of variation because right now the song is building and building adn you get absolutely nothing from the map. The spacing change is basically non existant.

on 01:03:802 (1,2,3,4) - you could change up movement and make something like https://celerih.s-ul.eu/gGTePXEv.png swithcing to somth like https://celerih.s-ul.eu/JqH79vhN.png for the last 3.

You don't have to do exactly what i did but just have something so that the difficulty isn't so flat. Yeah it's a hard but you still have a good amount of leniency here you don't need ds

https://gyazo.com/ed85ef7b8e961a8b34072fa816298c49

your spacing goes from 1.2x to 1.3x ds that's nothing and not enough, hence why i proposed changing up the movement so you're not just doing the same thing for the entire buildup

from 01:01:468 - to 01:05:968 - there's p much 0 variation even though the song keeps building up more and more

i do it

c

or maybe triples at 01:03:802 (1) - 01:05:135 (1) - instead as those feel intense and are at the beginning of the phrase

same for 02:12:802 (4,5,6) - 03:22:135 (4,5,6) - part

i agree wiith this, but if i add more bursts it'll be too difficult for a new player. considering this is only a hard diff and the lowest diff of the set, more repeat sliders would make it easier for new players, which is why ill keep how it is.

1

zz

1

02:42:135 (4) - 03:54:135 (4) -

agree, done

1

current snapping should work well enough for a hard diff, there is a drum on the sliderend of this reverse

^

1

agree with idke here, you've been prioritizing the guitar in this section on stuff like 01:36:968 (1,2,3) - and here snapping it to 1/3 properly like so https://celerih.s-ul.eu/XdbdW17f.png would fit much better

really don't agree, i get that mapping the guitar was prioritized but even so. i don't think there is a single other 1/3 part in this map and even if there is it would be really out of place. I get the problem but I don't agree with it and when playing the map it plays well and goes with the rest of the gameplay.

1

how is it very inconsistent? seems fine to me, they're both rlly similar distances so I don't see the problem.

https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/14534918/f049 vs https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/14534919/c9da I dunno really easily noticeable ngl

? stacking issue maybe. but it seems fine for me so not sure. leave as resolved for now

1

yea, agree

1

agree

1

#1413816

1

a few times throughout the the map, like 3 or 4 times i believe, like 01:22:385 (5,1) -
and I think it's fine as it's a intense part of the song, and even so I think ppl who play hards should be able to do it fine.

a triple like that isn't exactly the same as playing 1/4 after a 1/1 slider like in my example

https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/14636720/26d3 something like this instead, would play a decent bit better than blue tick 1/4 considering this is a hard where you usually want to avoid blue tick emphasis at this bpm

is fine rlly

1

literally had a BN problem stamp it on another hard that was lower bpm even, in a diff that had no blue tick 1/4 except for an instance EXACTLY like this (1/1 slider into blue tick 1/4 into a 1/2 slider). Pretty much the same issue here

hard agree that this isn't a problem at all there,s no need to change it zzz idk which BN told u that but uhh they're wrong

i don't think it's a problem too..

1026993#1287304 haha xd ok w/e but there is a vocal on the sliderend 03:51:635- so why map it passively

yeah also he didn't problem stamp it, was my memory being off, he problem stamped a different mod

1