00:18:462 (147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159) - Change this pattern to ddkd(kddk)d(kkkd) to follow the high pitched noise (idk what to call it lol) in the background more closely.
00:18:612 (149) - Whilst I'm not too sure what your 1/6 is following, moving the first one to start here and the second at 00:18:912 (154) - feels like it makes more sense to me within context to the song since that's where the emphasized synth in this pattern seems to be
00:23:562 (204) - cymbal crash here and then a brief pause - maybe delete 00:23:712 (205) to account for this
00:28:512 (263) - would advise changing this 1/6 to something that ends with a k instead of a d so that you can change 00:28:662 (264) - to a k and 00:28:812 (265) - to a d. Suggesting this because 00:28:812 (265) - is pretty clearly a bassy sound and the two notes before it (00:28:512 (263,264) - ) are amen snares
00:34:512 (327) - Would remove finish on this and maybe change it to a k to make sure the emphasis on the finishers stays on the heavy bass kicks at 00:34:212 (325,329) - . There's no bass kick at 00:34:512 (327) - so having it as a D the same as the other sounds feels a bit too dissonant
00:34:812 - 3/8 is more accurate than 1/3 for these doubles, change to https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/14426670/d245
00:35:712 (334) - This is the same sound as 00:35:912 (335) - and that's a k, would advise changing this to a k to match it. (This one also has a snare sound under it if drums are what you chose to follow)
00:38:862 (355,356,357,358,359,360) - delete and 00:39:612 (361) - change to D
I think it gives an atmosphere of the part break.
01:07:662 (658) - This pattern feels a bit broken for what's happening in the music to me. Making it one solid pattern from 01:07:662 (658) - to 01:08:262 (664) - seems to fit the drums better and it also removes the note at 01:08:337 - which helps give 01:08:412 (665) - the nice emphasis of the stop a better feeling
agree, and decided to remove 01:07:137 (652) - which wasn't that relevant to make things less repetitive, since then both patterns whould have started with kkdkddk
Also it makes sense to remove that note and keep it in the last patterns because it follows vocals well
very good mod!
01:14:037 (725,726) - Change the first note to a don and the second one to a kat to follow the pitch of the voice more closely.
01:21:537 (739) - consider deleting this note and changing 01:21:612 (740) - to k, fits better with the vocal pitch on this one and it gives more 1/4 breaks
01:27:462 (870,871,872,873,874,875,876,877,878,879,880,881,882,883,884,885,886,887,888,889,890,891,892) - you could add more 1/6 to this part, it would be a nice contrast since a large section of the map before is mainly 1/4. Would be a fun switch up :)
01:33:462 (932,933,934) - Think this would be better if you removed 01:33:537 (933) - and changed 01:33:462 (932) - to a k. Changing 01:33:462 (932) - to a k is suggested because it is the same sound as 01:33:312 (931) - and playing them both as different coloured notes felt weird to me in testing. I suggest removing 01:33:537 (933) - because the stream before it is a bit of a beast and giving the player the small break of 1/2 notes instead of the 1/4 immediately after makes a bit more sense to me
why isn't this note 01:38:712 (993) - a finisher ? compare it with this one 01:39:312 (996) -
01:42:537 (1029,1030) - Swap these two notes to follow the pitch of the voice and drums more closely.
01:50:262 (1104) - would change this to a k since it's the same sound as 01:50:262 (1106) - . Also makes all the finishers here the only d notes so they get their own kind of emphasis. Or something like that lmao
02:05:337 (1263,1264) - Swap these two notes and add a don at 02:05:487 to follow the pitch of the vocals and the drums more closely.
02:06:162 (1269,1270,1271,1272,1273,1274,1275,1276,1277,1278,1279,1280,1281) - I think this sounds nicer as kdkk(dddk)k(dddk) - Everything in brackets indicates it's a 1/6 pattern.
02:20:862 (1419) - Big fan of low SV streams, gj making it fun to play and gj to Axer for making the sv in this section ramp up nicely :)
02:30:312 (1558,1559,1560,1561) - kdkd ? Like 02:29:412 (1546,1547,1548,1549) - sounds better imo
03:16:137 (294,296,297) - Change the first note to a kat, and swap the second and third note to follow the drums and voice more closely.
Also makes these patterns consistent with 03:46:962 (579,580,581,582,583,584,585,586,587,588,589) and 04:07:362 (791,792,793,794,795,796,797,798,799,800,801).
03:31:062 (454,455,456,457) - I think this 1/6 would work better as a pattern like dddk or kkkd. The last note being an abrupt stop to the previous section would be reflected nicely by the note colour change I think
Here is a suggestion of SV and patterns
03:38:412 (486,487,488,489,490,491,492,493,494,495,496,497,498) - I think 「d k d d k d k k d d k d k 」is better than now because d d k d k, latter half, is more matching to the pitch.
03:39:612 - And from here, I would recommend changing SV to 0.75 'till 03:40:812 - to be prominent the change in speed of a thing
04:32:412 (1027,1028,1029,1030) - This part here feels really off to me when I'm playing it. I think it's because 04:32:612 (1030) - is on a 1/6 tick instead of a 1/4? Instead of placing the two 1/4 notes to make it a (kkkd)ddk you've chosen to make only use one d that splits both bass kick sounds and it murders the flow imo. I'd advise changing it to a regular 1/6 quad and then two 1/4 notes to keep the flow instead of the 1/6 triplet then 1/6 note
04:32:512 (1029,1030) - The drum sound here is really clearly 1/2 and there isn't really a sound to support the weird snap on these, 04:32:712 (1031,1032) - is fine because you can hear the string pretty clearly but for the (kkd)d d thing I would honestly suggest just using 1/4
Pretty much every single other pattern in this section is 1/2 or 1/4, followed by 1/3 going into 5 objects of 1/4
This is the only exception to that pattern
04:50:937 (1226,1227) - ctrl+g ? Like 04:55:662 - which divided the vocal more clear. You may also apply it on 03:05:337 (171,172) - , 03:08:937 (213,214) - , 03:13:737 (266,267) - , 03:26:937 (415,416) -, 06:06:537 (2005,2006) - etc. If you're looking for variation, just ignore it
04:57:612 (1297) - Maybe it's because finishers really screw me up in playing, but they don't seem to follow any sort of pattern to reasoning in this section and it feels really odd to play. I don't know if you are following the big bassy kicks or improvising, but having at least some legible structure to them would make the section play a bit smoother imo. Sounds like 04:58:512 (1303) - sometimes have D finishers but other times (like this) it's just a regular k with no finish? If I'm missing something here just ignore all of this but to me it feels a bit incoherent
05:03:612 - seems weird to have this bit mapped using 1/4, i suggest doing this:
kkdd(kddk)d(kkkd)d(kkkd)d(kkkd)d(kddkddk)ddd(kkkdkkd) so that you mark all of the appropriate sounds using 1/6, also 05:02:712 - is the only quad that's not kkkd because the pitch is significantly lower. also you raise sr up to 7.8 lmao
05:04:287 (1360) - Would advise changing this to a d since it's 05:04:212 (1359,1360,1361,1362) - all of these notes have the same sound
05:04:662 (1371) - I think change this note to a d. Matches the change in pitch of the song better . 05:03:912 (1358,1359,1360,1361,1362,1363,1364) - I think changing this to a kddkddk also fits nicer.
05:13:137 (1464,1467) - Swap these two notes to follow the vocals more closely and make the beginning of this pattern flow better.
I might be deaf, but I don't hear any sound here and it sounds like the piano ends at 06:24:012 (2), so I suggest removing this note.