Maybe the next waltz

00:04:124 (1,2) - blanket is not perfect, if u care

00:05:124 (2,3) - stacking can suggest 1/1 rhythm when 00:04:124 (1,2) - this is 1/2 spaced, so consider moving 00:06:124 (3) - somewhere else

00:09:124 (1,2,3) - Seems like you wanted to make here perfect circle shaped pattern so you should make the spacing between these sliders the same.

00:10:458 (2) - I think this circle should be actually changed to 5/6 slider like every one which follows the same kind of rhythm. It just seems to be a bit random when you are focusing on kind of sound by sliders but you are suddenly placing a circle instead.

00:11:791 - strong vocal sound skipped, when you previously followed vocals

00:14:458 (1,2) - This kind of flow is a bit harsh to aim because the angle between sliders is really sharp. What are you think about something like this instead? https://puu.sh/yHYso/df0dc71646.png Should work nicely here.

00:21:458 (2,3) - This antiflow can be very uncomfortable to aim because of the really sharp transition between these objects. Maybe try something similar to this? https://puu.sh/yHYyL/c21764cb3d.png It fits your style I guess, you were using similar flowed patterns for example 00:16:124 (1,2,3) - here.

00:22:791 (4) - vocals stop here, so maybe NC and remove NC here 00:23:124 (1) -

00:23:680 - there is a beat here that /can/ be hit.

00:23:902 (2) - actually overmapped. 00:23:791 (1,2,3,1) - this whole thing screams for emphasis but the music is not suggesting that this be as strong as you mapped it. mostly just the overmapped beat.

Not a big deal here but seems like you missed a stack 00:29:791 (3) - 00:30:680 (1,2) - here. Doesn't look really nice so I prefer to fix it.

00:31:791 (4,6) - vocals are completely ignored here

00:31:902 (2) - overmapped a g ai n possible rhythm choice. could also do a decel stream (1,2,3,4,5) http://puu.sh/zsE24/c83e073940.jpg

for aesthetics, 00:33:124 (1,2,3,4) - align (1) and (3) on the same y-axis, as well as (3) and (4)?

00:33:791 (3,4) - Here spacing should be a bit bigger because you have a strong beat on the head of 00:34:124 - this slider. You emphasized 00:33:124 - this beat so you should emphasize 00:34:124 - this one too I think. My proposition is to do this like https://puu.sh/yHYP5/5b6d5ac9ea.png this, but this is just my proposition. // Same applies to 00:35:124 (3) - this beat.

00:38:902 (2,3) - overmapped AND overspaced z_Z_Z_Z_Z_zzz

00:39:902 (7,8) - possibly overmapped as well z-z-zz-z-z-

00:50:791 (3,4,5) - kind of strange decision. 00:47:347 (4,5) - doubles was always like this and that (00:51:013 (4,5)) broke this system. Yeah, I understand that music completely "fades" at this moment, but it seems to me that 00:51:124 (5) isn't too strong for this kind of movement. I think that you can use this (00:47:347 (4,5)) pattern here as well.

00:53:624 (3,4,1) - a bit hard to read rhythm when spacing is almost the same

00:54:680 (2) does sound and feel better over yonder -> 00:54:624 (2) - and moving 4 over to here 00:55:291 (4) - and extending 3 00:54:791 (3) to 00:55:124 does make the entire section flow smoother but, the sections melody slowed down and that random double did catch catch my attention and its quite awkward but however it is 00:54:624 through - 00:55:291, needs to be changed or id doesnt, you probably dont need to move the (3,4) but the (2) might need to be, im probably over reacting and there needs to be no changes, but im just throwing that out there

00:56:624 (2,3) - fake triangle

00:57:458 (3,4) - Seems kinda overspaced especially when spacing 00:57:791 (4,1) - here (on the strongest type of beat) is much smaller. My proposition is just to nerf this spacing a bit. // The same issue is repeating 00:59:458 (3,4) - here and 01:13:458 (3,4) - here.

01:02:124 (1) - 01:04:124 (1,2) - Probably there's the same kind of rhythm so why on the second one sounds on both white and red ticks are emphasized while on the first one there is emphasized sound on white tick only? Doesn't make a lot of sense of consistency so I prefer to try to make those sounds both emphasized by the same way.

01:04:624 (2,3,4,1) - yes, 01:05:124 (1) is the downbeat, but the musical phrase goes on, and it seems to me that 01:04:958 (4) is too emphasized. I propose to do so https://i.imgur.com/bwxSyU7.png (stack 01:04:958 (4) with 01:03:958 (4))

01:05:791 (3) - maybe 2 circles would be better since there's 2 clear drums + keeping some consistency with your right previous section 01:04:791 (3,4) -

01:11:458 (1) - possible to have 1/12 repeat there for the piano slide

01:11:791 (1) - use slower SV instead for emphasizing piano at 01:11:458 (1) -
maybe x0.75 will be enough

01:12:124 (1,2,3) - almost right angle between 2 and 3. Maybe just do so https://i.imgur.com/izA63O3.png (end of 01:12:791 (3) stacked with 01:13:791 (4) and 01:13:291 (2) moved as well)

01:16:124 (1) - i dont see any usage of straight lines, so maybe consider curving this slider like https://i.imgur.com/4dT9uLP.png or however fits you, just remove this straight line

01:19:958 (4) - this is the last sound before the culmination of the phrase, but the distance to it is the same as 01:19:458 (2). Also 01:19:124 (1,2,3) is a linear movement that is difficult to play. You can do something like this, but it's already your decision https://i.imgur.com/jyvkEAM.jpg

01:24:124 (4) - NC

01:26:458 (1,2,3,4) - This composition is making kind of reading problem during the gameplay because 01:26:458 (1) - 01:27:124 (3) - those shapes are perfectly stacked. In reference to the first guideline from osu!standard ranking criteria (General section) I prefer to change this pattern a bit to make it more comfortable to read. What are you think about this one? http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9782330

01:26:458 (1,3) - prefer avoid perfect overlap or do something 120° related pattern instead as you didn't put any of them on your diff except this

01:27:458 (4) - NC?

01:27:458 (4) - ctrl-j this? cuz the sound is different and much more intense than 01:26:791 (2) - so its weird 2 me to have completely different sounds on the same position