mapped by Avoidedoki
submitted
last updated
This beatmap wasn't updated since 6 May 2020 so it was graveyarded...
New Discussion
Please sign in to post or reply
Discussions
Sort by

00:00:071 (1,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,1,2,3) - this plays very boring. generally: following the same rhythm is fine. so is following the same types of patterning. but using the exact same patterns more than 2-3 times in a row makes the map play very boring

I suggest you change things up, so sliders arent exactly the same

permalink

changed this part

permalink
permalink
Marked as resolved by Shiomi-

00:01:129 (3) - It seems kinda random which slider is going to be facing the opposite direction. The third sliders on these notes is a louder piano sound so that should be the slider that faces the opposite direction every time.

permalink

in fact, when they're facing the other direction, the piano sound is a bit more intense than the others. Not rlly loud but i think it's fine

permalink
permalink
Marked as resolved by Shiomi-

00:02:541 (3) - ctrl+G?

permalink
permalink
Marked as resolved by Shiomi-

.

permalink
Reopened by Shiomi-

yep

permalink

F

permalink
Marked as resolved by Shiomi-

00:29:365 (4,5,6,7,1) - unsure about the flow into and of 00:31:129 (1) - here, feels a little too strong

permalink

it plays well imo, i'll wait for more mods to change

permalink
permalink
Marked as resolved by Shiomi-

00:32:188 (4) - idk how you feel but i would reccomend mapping the sounds underneath the held sound

permalink

i prefer to emphasize the piano :(

permalink
permalink
Marked as resolved by Shiomi-

00:33:600 (5,6) - x:315 y:213 looks better imo

permalink
permalink
Marked as resolved by Shiomi-

.

permalink
Reopened by Shiomi-

its fine as it is

permalink

F

permalink
Marked as resolved by Shiomi-

00:38:894 (4) - x:146 y:

permalink

00:38:894 (4) - x:146 y:96 emphasizes pattern

permalink
permalink
Marked as resolved by Shiomi-

.

permalink
Reopened by Shiomi-

changed a bit this part

permalink

F

permalink
Marked as resolved by Shiomi-

i guess it indeed looks better 1px down..

permalink
permalink
Marked as resolved by Shiomi-

00:45:953 (4) - You have a half beat slider leading into a quarter beat reverse slider. But I don't really see why the reverse slider is there and the tail end of the half beat slider lands on a fairly strong vocal so I think a slider head would be better for it. Here's how I would do it: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1z-7q8LU9oI4YbI7d6SFD-iDl2mXXfmIN

permalink

And then same kind of thing on the other parts that use the half beat slider into reverse quarter slider.

permalink

what you propose ignores the second piano sound i wanted to represent with the reverse slider. And the slidertail vocal is the less strong of the 3, so i personally think it's good as it is. I'll wait for more opinion on it

permalink
permalink
Marked as resolved by Shiomi-

00:57:600 (1) - NC cuz changing SV speed

permalink
permalink
permalink
Marked as resolved by Shiomi-

.

permalink
Reopened by Shiomi-

i prefer to not NC, because it kinda breaks the phrase in the vocal imo

permalink

F

permalink
Marked as resolved by Shiomi-

fix the last segment by placing the last anchor where the sliderendcircle ist

permalink
Reopened by [BH]Lithium

as i cant edit, maybe also make the second-to-last segment balanced

permalink

dont understand what you're saying, but I guess it's better now

permalink
permalink
Marked as resolved by Shiomi-

01:00:423 (3) - blanket mod

permalink

wtf is wrong with this blanket ??

permalink
permalink
Marked as resolved by Shiomi-

01:03:423 (3) - blanket mod

permalink

same, i cant see where you see a bad blanket, be more precise please...

permalink
permalink
Marked as resolved by Shiomi-

01:14:212 (3) - I think that in this kiai a slider here and in his peers look much better than just a note

permalink
permalink
permalink

.

permalink
Marked as resolved by Shiomi-

01:18:070 (2,1) - stack ends?

permalink
permalink
Marked as resolved by Shiomi-

.

permalink
Reopened by Shiomi-

yes great

permalink

F

permalink
Marked as resolved by Shiomi-

01:21:600 (4,5) - vocal intensity increases but the stack continues.I think this part could be more representative adding some spacing between 4 and 5.

permalink
permalink

.

permalink
Marked as resolved by Shiomi-

01:24:600 (1) - Don't need this NC, works fine just as a 1-2

permalink

01:27:423 (1) - same for here, you use ncs to show 1/2 and 1/1 gaps elsewhere so having comboing like this can be confusing to read and inconsistent

permalink
permalink
permalink
Marked as resolved by Shiomi-

.

permalink
Reopened by Shiomi-

agree

permalink

F

permalink
Marked as resolved by Shiomi-

01:26:894 (4) - with 01:27:423 (2) - and 01:28:306 (3) - cluttered

permalink

no- and yes

permalink
permalink
Marked as resolved by Shiomi-

01:28:659 (1) - with 01:27:600 (1) - maybe better screen usage?

permalink

dont understand. how can it be better space usage if all is stacked ? + it doesn't play better imo

permalink
permalink
Marked as resolved by Shiomi-

01:33:247 (1,2,1,2) - unbalanced

permalink

uh ? wdym ? If you talk about spacing, the song is in a crescendo here , so I find it appropriate to increase spacing in this section

permalink
permalink
Marked as resolved by Shiomi-

01:34:659 (1,2,3,4) - These four notes go from out to in, but the drums in the strong get stronger. So I would recommend making the notes go from in to out so that the increase in spacing matches the increase in the volume of the drums.

permalink

yeah nice!

permalink
permalink
Marked as resolved by Shiomi-

01:45:953 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4) - These drums are very similar to these ones in the song : 01:34:659 (1,2,3,4,1,1,2) I like the triple but you turn these notes: 01:46:659 (1,2) into a slider since that's what you did the last time these drums played. I think it would make it more consistent.

permalink

nah no need. 01:35:365 (1) - slider was made to catch a little the vocals, and 01:46:835 (2) - drum is way louder than 01:35:365 (1) -

permalink
permalink
Marked as resolved by Shiomi-

01:48:424 (1) - with 01:47:365 (1) - screen usage

permalink

^

permalink
permalink
Marked as resolved by Shiomi-

01:51:247 (1) - maybe put slightly further to the left to avoid overlap with 01:50:189 (1)

permalink

mmh okay

permalink
permalink
Marked as resolved by Shiomi-

02:01:482 (1) - why SV speed is different from 02:01:835 (2)? Shouldn't they be the same?

permalink
permalink
Marked as resolved by Shiomi-

.

permalink
Reopened by Shiomi-

02:01:482 (1) - is much more intense than the other sounds so it deserves a higher SV imo

permalink

F

permalink
Marked as resolved by Shiomi-

02:04:306 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - difficulty spike. seems a bit excessive for an insane diff, with cross-screen jumps. nerfing this would fit the diff better imo

permalink

you're right, i've nerfed it a bit

permalink
permalink
Marked as resolved by Shiomi-

02:06:423 (1) - would place it with 02:04:306 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - pattern and then 02:06:776 (2) - bottom right corner

permalink

cool idea !

permalink
permalink
Marked as resolved by Shiomi-
/