00:05:995 (2,3) - I wouldn't mix 1/2 and 1/4 stacks like this (ex, 00:00:436 (2,3)), it feels confusing to play and is easily misread
00:09:436 (7) - This is a massive jump for a 1/4, maybe change 00:09:260 (6) - into a circle (it doesn't have a sound on its tail anyways)
i mostly agree with 00:12:805 - 00:21:276 and changed it accordingly, however i think that 00:34:688 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) , 01:22:688 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) and 01:22:688 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) suit the song well, as the song intensifies at those parts and i think a small stream can work.
00:15:966 (1,2,3,4,5) - I hear nothing special here.. any reason why this is a burst into a kickslider?
Edit: I would put that here 00:22:672
00:17:747 (3,4) - Give these red anchor points too since they are in the same combo and representing the same sound
00:24:083 (1) - So the jumps starting from here has the same spacing as here: 00:09:966 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - When the first-mentioned part obviously does not need that much emphasis.
00:24:083 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2) - This part is not more getting more intense yet the jumps are mapped like there is something intense going on.. I would nerf these
yea i was sceptical about that part too, but if you listen closely and turn music up and effects down, you can hear that the drum increases in intensity slightly. the previous sections have the guitar as the loudest instrument, whereas at 00:24:083 - 00:33:966 - the drum takes over, thus warranting some small jumps
00:28:335 (1,2,3,4) - Give these a higher SV because they are in an intense part of the song.
00:29:731 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,1,2) - same here.. nothing special is happening.. song is really downbeat.. but the spacing keeps changing
00:32:570 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - use a triamgle (1,2,3,1,2,3) comboing and positioning to represent song better.
00:35:907 (2,3,4,5) - 00:37:319 (1,2,3,4,5) - Now here is where you can space out your notes but here your spacing is less than 00:24:083 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2)..
00:35:923 (2) - you can delete this circle because there is like nothing to follow and it sound better
i think some of those are good and i changed them accordingly, whereas some others cant really be deleted without resulting in a really long slider. i also think it fits the song well, regardless of there not being a significant sound. i also dont want random gaps in notes or an overabundance of sliders where there could be circles
00:55:158 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - i dont like this section, but please avoid overlaps here, they are ugly
00:58:672 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - This is a massive intensity decrease compared to 00:56:554 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) with the transition from 1/2 jumps to 1/2 sliders. I think the previous patterns are pretty overspaced which makes it hard to increase intensity when swapping to 1/2 sliders, nerfing the previous pattern would make this pattern more viable with the songs growing intensity.
00:58:688 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - You could represent the song getting louder by making these sliders more and more spaced apart until the spinner hits.
01:47:747 (1,2,1,2) - Make the distance between these 2 1,2's the same as 01:47:041 (1,2,1,2)