00:11:685 (2,3) - I think distance here should be different with distance 00:11:503 (1,2) - here since 00:12:230 (3) - here has drum sound that 00:11:685 (2) - doesnt have.
00:12:957 (1,2,3,4) - you should remove the nc at 00:12:957 (1) - and move it to either of 00:13:321 (3,4) -, depending on what you decide to do with the ncs in top diff.
00:12:957 (1,2) - imo this is harder to hit than what you did in insane, consider changing it for the sake of the spread being progressively harder as it goes
00:16:230 - this should be clickable tbh, i get you're following the trumpet, but since you ignored the dragging sound at 00:18:593 (4,5) - you might aswell make the piano note at 00:16:230 - clickable, too
00:22:957 (3,4,1) - equal spacing between them? 00:23:139 (4,1) is still part of the phrase 00:22:957 (3,4) is in, it's a 3 beat long part
00:24:594 (1) - Remove NC here and add it on 00:24:957 (3) - like you did for the previous 00:12:957 (5,6,1) -
00:24:957 (3,1,2,1,2,1,2,3) - NC is quite confusing around this session. 00:24:957 (3,1) - You should swap it here and then continue your current pattern that is NCing at every 1 downbeat. (00:26:230 (3) - adding here 00:26:957 (1) - removing here...)
00:36:048 (1,2,3) - you could have kept the distance the same, why there is just a slight reduction in the spacing I do not see why, it makes it look too declining and gives the impression of holding back
00:36:593 (4) - Same here and so on, welp, I guess you got me, won't mention them again xP
EDIT: Mh.. there is an other option tho, changing the first NC instead of all those one or they would become too short i guess
00:36:957 (2,4) - this perfectly stacked slider looks hard to read for newbies. you should unstack them for better reading for players
00:42:412 (4,6) - reverse is kinda hidden here. should really avoid from doing this since you avoided doing this in insane at 01:13:866 (4,1) - too
00:48:230 (1) - feels too underwhelming for how the song plays here.end it on 00:48:594 - and add a circle at 00:48:775 -
ehm, but the melody and vocals are underwhelming by themselves, a 3/2 slider absolutely fits for the calmility of the song and vocals. The only dominant rhythm in this section of the song is the vocal and to be honest I don't hear anything interesting on 00:48:775 - but just a weak beat. So I keep the 3/2 slider for the vocal. Same with Insane.
00:53:139 (3) - because the sliderend is on the beginning of the snare it was a little odd, especially given how the hitsounds are also emphasizing that now, I would say shift the slider to start at 00:53:321 and have 00:53:503 (4) before it
00:57:866 (4,5,1) - instead of increasing spacing for both 5 and 1, do it for 1 only or give 1 even more emphasis because its a lot stronger than the sound at 00:58:048 -
00:58:048 (5,1,1,2) - This spacing is kinda tricky imo. If you want emphasize the finish set at 00:58:230 (1) - just place this circle at 40|252 to make a linear pattern together with 00:57:866 (4,5) - . If you don't like this you can place to somewhere else but in a way that the spacing is easily readable because imo it isn't at the moment
00:58:230 (6) - Have u considered making this note go up to create a sharp flow that offers more emphasys to the beat?
00:58:957 (3,4) - facing each other or something? Rather than having 00:58:957 (3) lead nicely to 00:59:321 (4) - you could have them face opposite directions to show how strong that part is and each slider has an emphasis
01:04:775 (1) - It would be more logical to remove NC here and add it at 01:05:685 (3) - (being the vocal on the same section of the whole previous part) to emphasize the downbeat at 01:05:685 - indeed, just like you did for 01:16:412 (4) -