01:17:561 (1,2,3) - feel like you can reduce these doubles a bit, they are kinda tight considering that the pitch isn't that high
g
01:22:388 (3,4) - would highly recommend moving 3 a little closer to 4, the distance is quite unexpectedly large tbh
no u
02:25:751 (4) - minor but i'd move this to the left slightly cuz the pitch is gradually decreasing here
r
02:38:940 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - tn-shi whyyyy :oooooooo:
02:44:975 (3,4,5) - that is 1/6
clear piano on blue so nop
clear piano on 1/6 you mean cuz this is incorrect
na crescendo clearly goes faster here as they usually are
use 25%, this is 1/6??? it doesn't go faster at all
I think its fine at 1/4.
it is 1/6 lol
sounds more close to 1/6 for me
plz do me a favor and place (5) on the 1/6 tick and add like a finish hs on it, it sounds clearly late to the piano. 1/4 is just spot on
plus the high pitch note is clearly indicative of the piano slightly speeding up as usual in crescendoes
02:54:802 (5,6) - make this horizontal to reflect the higher pitch?
02:57:906 (7,8) - same
better now i think
03:45:837 (1) - would be nice if this is more horizontal since the sound is intense enough for more emphasis
did slightly
03:56:182 (1,2,3,4) - could use 1/6 here?
shore
03:58:423 (5) - wanna do a 1/8 triplet here for the buzzy repeating sound?
m prefer to contrast w 03:59:802 (2,3,4) - for variation
04:01:182 (2,3,4,5) - 1/6
e i think its fine to contrast the higher pitch on 04:01:699 (1,2,3) - better
what are you contrasting? this is incorrect snapping, not a pattern issue
uhh if u listen to the song the volumes r not the same one is much clearer the other is p faint and snapping in general affects the patterning lol
04:28:595 (1,2,3,4,5) - squish this a little, chokepoint fo sure
did slight song is rly intense here so intended holdash
i think 0.9 won't make this pattern any bad and this is still a diffspike
bro havent even seen the update yet