Aimai Attitude (feat. Nakamura Sanso)

00:03:781 (3781|6) - release timing pretty weird, shorten to just red line at 00:03:931 - works imo

00:04:006 - should be 1/8

00:08:206 - until 00:09:181 - i think these parts make it slightly confusing on which part you emphasize with normal notes and which part you are trying to do with triple long note, because it feels rather inconsistent here.

my recommendation is to consistently use normal note everytime there is distinct loud normal kick, to differentiate it with other sound, which makes your layering more consistent.

something like this will be preferable for layering consistency:

00:18:706 (18706|3) - here is good so I think 00:18:406 - also should be seperated

00:45:331 (45331|3) - think you can just make it col 5 to make consistent shield as the structure you build at 00:45:031 (45031|6,45181|5,45181|6,45331|5,45481|3,45631|3) -

00:47:206 (47206|2) - personally i think you can just turn this LN into normal note instead for several reason:

1. given the loud clap emphasis here, it feels weird to just have 3 direct 1/2 long notes
2. given the other 2 other clap use rice note, this one deserved one too imo
3. the pattern structure after this part seems to also have much more breathing space room as well, so it makes sense for this one to also be the same.

00:58:681 (58681|4,58681|1,58681|3,58681|2,58681|6) - inconsistent note count with 01:00:481 (60481|6,60481|4,60481|2,60481|5) -

01:04:531 (64531|6) - move this to col 1? the notes condensed at col 6 and col 7 felt out of place imo

01:04:981 (64981|4,65131|4,65281|4,65731|4,65881|4,66031|4) - this part seems oddly have a bit more stacked than others

i think can move 01:04:981 (64981|4) - to col 6 instead, how about it?

01:21:931 - I guess i felt awkward you sort of ignored this vocal, given you try map something like 01:24:331 (84331|3) - which have far less prominent sound.

Even if you do it intentionally but given the vocal is pretty distinct, it feels missing for me. plus you map the vocal at 02:29:131 -

01:28:231 - 01:29:431 - generally i know you intentionally try ignore this sound but given they are same sound as 01:27:031 (87031|1,87031|4) - , it ended up struck me as awkward and inconsistent instead.

01:33:631 (93631|3) - think you can change one of the note to LN to maintain the consistency with previous double 1/4 LN such as 01:32:881 (92881|2,92881|1,93181|1,93181|6) -

01:45:331 - This roll seems not fit the music well . I mean the drum are here 01:45:331 - 01:45:406 - so do sth like this ?

01:50:731 - and 01:51:931 - are longest vocal so how about do sth LN stair tails here ? its all up to you and OK if keep

02:06:481 (126481|3) - 02:11:281 (131281|3) - i think both of these can be changed to normal note, emphasizing the crash , doesn't disturb your structure and give better pattern contrast as well there.

02:13:681 (133681|6,133718|5,133831|2,133868|1) - i think you can just go ham with full 1/8 LN here given that there is no clear differentiation of what you try to differentiate with 02:13:981 - , and i think sync better with current pattern idea.

02:14:881 - 02:15:481 - These two seems clear drum , so how about delete the grace

02:45:818 - How about make an echo for 02:45:181 (165181|4,165218|5,165256|6) - ?

02:58:606 - love love love

02:58:831 - 03:00:031 - The heart pattern is cool but I think its unreasonable to set a grace here . hou about this

03:12:031 - Main lead needed ?

03:42:481 (222481|0,222481|2,222556|4,222556|6,222631|0,222631|2,222706|6,222706|4) - i think this doesn't fit to be trill sound given 03:42:481 - have its own distinct sound and i think this one should be triple instead.

do something like this will be more fitting imo

03:48:143 - seems gap is too short and make a jack on col 1 ? not a big problem for playability but how about change some

for reference only

03:50:206 (230206|1,230206|0,230281|2,230318|1,230356|0) - Seems the only jacky this song ? also 03:50:206 - chord size too big ?

04:21:931 - it feel like jack yeah but I think current ver is very easy to miss (end part miss is soooooo )
how about this