MERRY MERRY MERRY MENU... ne!

00:08:354 (1,2) - and 00:09:021 (1,2) - are you sure about using such a difficult pattern here? for a simple overdose, this is a very strong increase in difficulty due to the uncomfortable flow here. it's also not an overly intense part of the song which would require such special emphasis. when comparing those patterns to 00:13:688 (1,2) - and 00:14:354 (1,2) - which represent very similar sounds, then 00:08:354 (1,2) - and 00:09:021 (1,2) - also stand out as much more difficult. you could bring the difficulty down to a more appropriate level by using a more flowy pattern like in 00:13:688 (1,2) - and 00:14:354 (1,2) -

00:25:521 (5) - add nc, remove at 00:25:854 (1), synths intensity

00:25:521 (1) - I think this is supposed to be 1/2

00:25:604 - is there any reason you have a reverse slider note here? it doesn't seem to follow any sound or act as emphasis for any other sounds, you could remove it and just have a 1/2 slider on 00:25:521 (5) - instead for better song representation

00:29:354 (6,7,1) - this pattern is extremely difficult currently to not miss on. it requires you to hyperdash between 00:29:354 (6,7) - then slow down to a walk to not miss 00:29:604, only to speed up once again in the same direction to hit 00:29:688 (1) - which is antiflow with the quick move back again. all of these movements are required within 1/4 time intervals. compared to the rest of the map, this is a huge difficulty spike and should be nerfed. you could do it by putting 00:29:688 (1) - on the other side of the playfield, which would keep the emphasis intended with the antiflow while keeping the rest of the pattern simple enough

since you followed the xylophone-ish sounds on 00:37:354 (6,7) - you could also have a 1/4 slider on 00:37:188 - to follow the sound on 00:37:271 - as well for consistency

00:38:354 (2,1) - are you sure you want to have the 0.85x distance here when you always normally did 1x? i see there are problems with playfield room here, but you could restructure 00:37:188 (5,6,7) - a bit to lead 00:37:688 (1,2,1,2) - more towards the left side of the playfield and create more room to have the consistent 1x distance here as well

there is a very strong sound on 00:42:854 (6) - while 00:42:688 (5) - is just normal intensity, so the equal hyperdash distances for both are not ideal for the best song representation. since there is also a strong sense of buildup, you could do a higher distance hyperdash than usual between 00:42:688 (5,6) - to emphasise 00:42:854 (6) - better

01:02:271 - could skip mapping this note for consistency as you didn't really follow any of the xylophone sounds previously

01:10:354 (1,2,3,4,1) - don't you think this pattern is a bit too overkill for the current difficulty? It stands out really badly as a big diff spike that I think can be reduced a bit to fit with the rest of the map a bit more

suggestion would be to make 01:10:354 (1) - vertical possibly; anything to reduce some of the antiflow here a bit

01:37:354 (6,7,8,9) - kinda inconsistent where u have double hdash here 00:29:354 (6,7) -, same for 01:40:021 (8,9) -

01:46:688 (1,2) - make this the same as 01:47:188 (1,2) - ? so that the first two start from the left and the last two start from the right

01:47:688 (3,4,5,6,1) - you currently have an antiflow before the hyperdash to 01:48:021 (5) giving it extra emphasis, while 01:48:354 (1) has a flow pattern giving it less emphasis, despite 01:48:354 being clearly the more intense sound compared to 01:48:021. you could improve emphasis by either just making 01:47:688 (3,4) flow better or if you want to use the antiflow, could rather add it on 01:48:021 (5,6) instead

01:50:854 (7) - would replace with a single note here, there's no distinct sound on 01:50:938 so having a 1/4 double here feels awkward

01:56:854 (4) - you could just do a 1/2 slider here, 01:57:188 (5) is not an overly intense sound so the overmapping is overwhelming for the lower intensity here

01:57:271 - could map this as well when you mapped the rest of the xylophone-ish sounds on 01:57:188 (5,6,7) -

02:03:354 (2) - kinda underwhelming to have this as vertical since there's a noticeable vocal, please use horizontal

02:28:688 - there's a pretty strong sound here but only a flow walk, which feels underwhelming. you could do a hyperdash or at least a dash for it instead to emphasise it better

02:43:354 (1,2,3,4) - can you move 3~4 to the left for a bit so that it's more comfortable with full dash?

02:43:771 (2,3) - can you move these to the right slightly? movement would be more natural

02:54:354 (3,4,5) - would reduce to 1.3x since the pitch is low compared to 02:55:521 (4,1,2) -

02:57:354 (4) - 2 notes here for the emphasis like you did on 02:58:688 (4,5) - ?

02:57:354 (4) - missing whistle and clap

03:07:271 (2) - bit more of a minor post compared to the other one, but having this face left feels a bit weird imo, feels weirdly snappy, I think having it face right would fit the general flow of the map better (especially for similar times you mapped these drums before)