00:12:703 (4,1) - did u want these sliderborders to perfectly overlap? because they're slightly off rn
00:20:863 (2,3,1) - i kinda get what you're going for but having such a large rhythm gap in tapping here kinda made it feel like density died randomly
00:21:223 - 00:21:583 - I think you could add a circle at either of these timestamps to make this part feel a little less empty
00:50:143 (1,2) - felt a bit abnormally large (but still somewhat comfortable) compared to a spacing like 01:40:063 (1,2) -
00:59:743 (1) - if you're gonna heavily prioritise vocal and skip over 00:59:983 01:00:343 but then immediately switch to highlighting those other sounds right after 01:00:703 (2,1,2) - it makes it very difficult to understand the rhythm here
I would suggest a rhythm that still highlights these other sounds at the start of the section instead of skipping over them, something like this feels more natural to me:
01:29:263 (3,4,5) - why so small? 00:39:343 (3,4,5) - i was expecting something like this to highlight the vocal
00:43:183 (3,4,5) - 01:33:103 (1,2,3) - and it kinda undermines the usage of these spacings being used the highlight the drum pitch
02:24:943 (3,4,5) - 02:26:863 (3,4,5) - 02:28:783 (3,4,5) - etc and then you get the final chorus and you kinda spam this low spacing pattern way more often which is kinda counter intuitive since then the earlier choruses are actually harder in comparison
01:34:783 (2,3,4,5,6) - for example is way harder and representative of the vocal than say 02:47:743 (2,3,4,5) -
I would highly revise some of this end spacings because u should not make it feel easier overall than the earlier sections
01:39:703 (4) - 01:40:063 (7) - nc
01:40:183 (1) - remove nc
00:49:423 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - u did this earlier