00:49:815 (3,1) - bro that jump needs to be higher like the previous ones 00:49:402 (3,1) - the intensity is so high for a small representation x-x
00:56:283 (3,4) - a small jumps Works better than a stacking notes, sounds interesing making a jump instead of 2 stacking
00:57:246 (1,2) - think if you ctrl+g both individually would work better to contrast with 00:56:696 (1,2) - and highlight the rhythm change here
really love current pattern and movement, this slider shape 00:57:246 (1,2) - is different than 00:56:696 (1,2) - so its ok enough in contrast terms
01:04:402 (1) - how about change the slider Direction to 01:04:815 (1) - ? uhh, the idea of something anti flow maybe can be trick for the first time and being easily missreading, so would be cool if the slider end of 01:04:402 (1) - be directioned to 01:04:815 (1) -