Chimi Moryo -Bakko-

00:02:730 (2730|2,2880|1,3030|0) - Continuously melody so I think it would fit the instrument better if I make it as 1/4 LN
00:02:880 - 1/4 Continuously LN and trill side [00:02:730 (2730|0,2880|1,3030|0)] on right hand would create a dynamic feeling in my opinion
00:14:730 - I think otherwise. As the intensity of the instrument fade out, I think putting a LN there would ruin the atmosphere of that part, as holding 3 LN at once rather feel heavier.
00:19:305 - I'm trying to keep it as simple as possible to provide a smooth and dynamic experience for players. Add one more LN would result in the would ambience part rather feel too forced, compared to the last part so far.

00:02:880 - don't quite understand that
00:02:730 (2730|0,2880|1,3030|0) - the flow is good enough imo
00:14:730 - doesn't necessary ruin the atmosphere, but alternatively you can end one of the lns here since the melody sort of fades out in this particular timing point.

00:14:730 - Resolved
00:02:880 - In short, keep it simple. 3 doubles at once would be dense compare the soft and light atmosphere the song have

00:20:886 (20886|2) - missed a 1/4 LN for string

00:23:586 (23586|1,23661|2,23736|0,23736|3) - Resolved
00:25:236 (25236|3) - Trying to do a running-man to emphasize the increasing pitch of the melody, but I guess there could be an alternative. Resolved
00:27:036 (27036|0,27186|2,27261|0,27336|2,27336|3) - Resolved
00:28:536 - It kind of break my intention of using LN trills if add a note here
00:29:436 (29436|2) - Interesting, but I keep my way on this one as my intention on this specific part is using the release of a LN to create a fade out effect.

00:28:536 - the part is still more audible than the single lns, which I think should be better represented with a jump (resolve if you want to keep it your way)

00:28:536 - I did realized that it is indeed more audible, but putting a double mean their loudness have to match 00:28:236 (28236|2,28236|3,28836|2,28836|3). So I guess I will resolve here

00:30:186, 00:30:486, 00:30:786 - Intentionally reducing the density.
00:31:236, 00:31:536 - The double should do its job on these parts I believe.
00:31:986, 00:34:386 - Intentionally, didn't put notes there to keep (00:31:236 - 00:31:836) and (00:32:136 - 00:33:636) (similar at latter) separate. I want to create more feel and emphasize on 00:32:136 so I didn't place notes there.

00:30:186, 00:30:486, 00:30:786 - I understand, but the execution is sort of counter-intuitive and feels like it's lacking (since the music itself is building up.)
00:31:236, 00:31:536 - if that's the case then you have to tell me what the lns at 00:33:786 (33786|0), 00:34:086 (34086|2), etc. represent, since it sorta feels the same (one with a little more intensity)
00:31:986, 00:34:386 - don't quite understand the concept, leaving the space empty makes the chart loses a lot of the buildup and feels empty (single notes serves as a filler so the chart doesn't lose its intensity, doing this won't hurt since the mentioned parts are still distinct from each other)

00:33:786 (33786|0), 00:34:086 (34086|2) - Here I'm trying to not make them doubles, so instead I use a long (1/2) LN to replace it
00:30:186, 00:30:486, 00:30:786 - I'll just assume I'm mapping with the vocal effects and loud ahh sound (coping)
00:31:986, 00:34:386 - That's thing I'm trying to avoid here, I'm trying to separate between 2 buildups

00:31:986 - could understand but I still think there can be a note for vocal, 00:32:136 - this LN and the burst could work its role as a build up

ya could agree with the burst, but keep 00:35:736 - a double would still fine for me
00:37:236 - seems like the starter of a beat so would be fine, up to the mapper Ig
00:44:211 (44211|3,44236|2,44361|1,44386|2) - seems like its mapper intention to use 1/12 for the fast synth so I think no problem in this

ye, also 00:45:786 - could be double too, for consistent with 00:48:186 -
for 00:48:761 - from your mod, I think it should be 00:48:767 - (1/16), sounds complex tho this could fill the note perfectly between 00:48:711 (48711|3,48823|2) -
agree with others

00:54:861 - should fill a note here, to make a contrast with your 1/8 triple 00:54:636 (54636|2,54673|3,54711|0) - and to make the break more natural

00:58:011 - same

01:13:686 - could double, looks a bit weak here

01:14:736 - I think some spli trill or jumptrill might work here ?

01:15:936 - should also do 1/6 burst here like 01:16:236 -
same 01:16:536 - 01:17:436 -

01:20:436 - break time is not suggested for mania diff, you better map something here

01:35:436 - 01:35:551 - would recommend to fill a note here, this break looks too long and loosen too much intensity

01:37:820 - kick should be 1/3 later

01:48:289 (108289|3) -

02:03:122 (123122|2,123139|3,123489|0,123514|1) - lmao, just make sure If this is intentional and snapped

02:04:589 (124589|3,124589|2) - same as #4556045

02:04:989 (124989|3) - sounds better to be 1/4

02:06:364 - note missed

02:07:414 - single this, not strong enough to be double imo
02:07:526 - should fill a note here

02:09:589 - I think this burst is too weak here, could buff 02:09:589 - to 02:09:889 - 1/8 burst

could fill note at 02:10:864 - for a clear build up