The Poetic Edda (Feat. Ben Duerr)

00:22:165 I don't understand the reasoning for the timing here. after inspecting this is what it should look like

00:24:195 (24195|3,24316|3,24437|3,24559|3,24680|3,24801|3,24922|3,25043|3,25165|3,25286|3,25407|3,25528|3) - These anchors are completely unnecessary and the only thing they provide for the chart, is awkwardness and unplayability. There's no real reason on why they should be there. I would recommend getting rid of them completely.

00:33:831 00:34:195 00:34:559 I suggest highlighting the kick+cymbal on these beats with a triple or a position change of the double (example)

00:34:680 00:34:801 I suggest turning these doubles into single notes since the sound is much quieter here compared to the rest of the drum fill

00:45:346 this double should be in 1/2 not 1/3

00:46:286 you can hear a tom being hit here

00:57:831 00:58:013 00:58:104 these toms should also be mapped as doubles if 00:57:922 is

00:58:195 - 01:09:831
Check back on this part - try to make the notes match the tones in the song* more.

01:09:286 -
You missed kicks here.

01:06:922 (66922|1) 01:07:104 (67104|1) anchor feels unnecessary

01:32:316 should have additional ln here for violin

01:34:559 - 01:42:922

Any particular reason why you chose to shorten the LNs in this section compared to 01:20:013 and on?

01:52:013 - 01:57:831

Why is this part the exact same as 01:46:195 - 01:52:013. I assume you mapped the dump in there for the vocal, and the vocal clearly isn't present in the part mentioned, so why would it be the same density?

02:46:922 you can hear a snare being hit here

03:12:123 snare should be mapped

03:15:510 (195510|1,195510|0,195704|0,195704|2,195897|2,195897|1) -
Too harsh. Try something like this instead:

03:18:365 this double is mapped to nothing there's no sound being played on this beat

03:44:736 - 03:56:833
This part makes no sense in coherence with the parts before or after. I'd suggest to try dumping it as well, cause considering the rest of the map, 1/2 release inverse doesn't fit very well.

03:58:671 (238671|3,238720|0,238768|1,238816|2,238865|0,238913|3,238962|2,239010|1,239058|3,239107|0,239155|1,239204|3,239252|2,239300|1,239349|0,239397|2,239445|3,239494|1,239542|0,239591|3,239639|2,239687|1,239736|3,239784|0,239833|1,239881|2,239929|3,239978|1,240026|0,240026|3) -

Personal thought, but try gradually increasing the snapping here, I think it would fit the rising tone well.

04:46:116 04:46:389 suggest you highlight these snares with triples like 04:45:844

04:48:026 (288026|1,288026|0) -

This section under-represents the kicks too much. The LNs are a nice touch, but the structuring in this part should be redone. I'd suggest adding some hands in on the kicks instead of the jumps you have now, to make the section denser and allow the kicks to stand out more.

04:59:662 just an idea for this section you can try to make the notes short lns during the vocal phrases and keep them as normal notes when there's only guitar

05:15:818 - 05:48:511
This part is really really good wow

05:15:818 should make this a triple to more better represent the heavy sound on this beat