Aisuru Youni (Cut Ver.)

00:02:232 (5) - its better to use this rhythm again for 00:04:785 since its just repeating, and then actually use more active rhythm 00:04:785 (1,2) - on 00:07:338 (5) - when the pitch of the piano is higher

00:06:701 (4,1) - fix stack

00:07:657 (2,1,2,3,4) - can be spread out it looks very cramped rn and music is kinda loud compare to other ones

try this pattern =>

00:10:690 (4,1) - I would just make this a reverse slider since it uses 1/8

00:18:190 (3,1) - i think you could avoid the overlap here

00:21:700 (1) - un nc

00:27:126 (4,5) - this spacing is pretty crazy compared to 00:22:020 (4,5), 00:32:233 (4,5), 00:37:339 (4,5) which are over the same pitches and intensities in the lyrics, especially since the lower register piano has not come in yet

00:28:721 (1,2,3,4) - i see you started to follow piano here, if thats the case you can exchange 00:28:721 (1) - with 2 circles instead to show the 2 piano sound

00:37:339 (4,5) - blanket fix

00:41:487 would recommend adding another SV here for this part as it is slightly calmer than the previous section so i suggest 0.9 or 0.8 would be nice here

00:44:040 (1,2,1,2) - this is too much of a filler rhythm. this sudden switch into 1/3 piano is really awkward when the intensity rlly doesnt change that much and u followed the vocal throughout the verse section. just map the vocal :) .

00:50:424 (4) - new combo here and new combo here 00:51:062 (5) - to match the normal difficulty's combo

00:51:062 a bit underwhelming to start strong sound with slider tail would just make it active

would use a rhythm like this

00:51:700 - 01:12:125 (the kiai)

I would love to see more consistent emphasis on your finishers and/or the important vocals like you do on 01:00:477 (4,5) and 01:06:700 (2,1). This would make for more interesting gameplay while also representing the song in a beneficial way.

It is possible to do this with out throwing your visual ideas. For example

heres what it would look like for the entire section: https://streamable.com/cg7bjj

00:53:615 (2,3,4,5,1) - u can probs make this pentagon looks nicer

00:54:892 (1,2,3,4,5) - sharp angle aim here is pretty jumpscare, feels out of place when the rest of the map is all wide angle and flow aim, and I am not hearing a change in the song to justify the change in movement ideas. unsure what the map looked like before #4392341 , but would recommend replacing this pattern with something flow-ier

00:57:445 (2,3,4,5,6) - 00:52:338 (2,3,4,5,1) - 01:02:710 (3,4,5,6) - ik u love these pattern but ill break it to you this doesnt really work because 00:52:657 (4,5,1) - this vocal intensity goes full spike and shouldnt share the same spacing. would recommend to use similiar ideas from this 00:54:891 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - if u really want to keep the idea, but with much higher spacing . personal suggestion ---> https://imgur.com/a/I60yJW2

00:57:924 (4,1) - 00:59:360 (1,1) - 01:03:030 (4,1) - spacing here is too large. try and reduce how much these are spaced.

00:59:360 (1,1) - looks VERY simmilar to your 1/2 spacing and the large gap doesnt rlly emphasize something in the song so I would just be better to reduce the spacing to something simmilar to 01:04:467 (1,2,3)

00:59:519 (2) - this doesnt land on anything tbf would replace 00:59:359 (8) - with 1/2 slider to map the coval

01:00:317 (4) - unsnapped object

01:00:477 (4,5) - Less emphasis on this gap.

01:00:478 (5,6) - if you are going to use small spacing at 00:54:095 (5,1), you should do the same here imo as it better fits the call and response flow of the song here and the melody feels pretty resolved and not tense here.

01:08:296 (4) - this seems very underwhelming as you don't usually skip alot of rhythms for chorus?

i suggess you map piano like how you did with other rhythms

01:04:466 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - etc 00:59:838 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - etc

01:09:413 (4,1) - #4416820 and also I think the change in flow overemphasizes this note to the point of being jarring