mapped by Furox
submitted
last updated
This beatmap wasn't updated since 27 January 2025 so it was graveyarded...
New Discussion
Please sign in to post or reply
Discussions
Sort by

00:07:301 (1,2) - I think you intended to follow vocal in this section, but the head of 2 only falls on a weak vocal sound, while the more obvious vocal at 00:07:967 is ignored. Maybe something like this https://kanatama.s-ul.eu/FDYMdfTG (or use 1/2 sliders if you don't want 1/4 reverse) would follow the vocals here better and also more in line with the low intensity of the beginning.

permalink

00:12:634 (1,2,3) is better though, since the vocal on 2 is more dominant; I think it's ok if you want to keep that as is.

permalink

hmm i think its ok as is

permalink
Marked as resolved by Furox

00:11:801 - considering you put piano here, you ignore piano on 00:11:134 - and 00:12:467 - which have same amount of impact. the rhythm switch looks forced

i strongly suggest to map the piano and tweak the vocal around 00:10:301 (2,3,4) - or just alternatively follow the vocal fully like this

permalink

followed ur pic

permalink
Marked as resolved by Furox

00:17:134 (5) - since you cover piano here, might as well tweak 00:16:134 (3,4) - to something like

permalink

just followed same as above

permalink
Marked as resolved by Furox

00:43:801 (4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - - I think this part doesn't do a good job at representing either vocals or drums. The vocals here have 4 groups of triples and are represented in 3 different ways (active at 13, 23, or 12); I mean there is melody changes but I doubt it deserves such variation in active rhythm. For drums, 00:43:801 is followed by a circle, 00:45:134 is covered by a slider anchor, while 00:44:467 is ignored. I'd prefer make the rhythm choice here more simple and intuitive, maybe smth like this https://kanatama.s-ul.eu/bvDuXxnu (no active rhythm on drums, and consistent active rhythm for vocals). If you prefer some variation in vocal rhythm, I suggest only vary it once e.g. https://kanatama.s-ul.eu/qmTRPpvj

permalink

btw this issue also exists in Hard. Top diff is better, but at least I suggest using an NC at 00:43:967

permalink

yea, this (kinda confused on how to tackle this b4). i do have another alternative where it doesn't sacrifice instrument, use simplification and still lean on vocal on 00:43:134 (3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - , something like or

there's still more any other alternative. but since snare have strong feedback generally, making sure the prominent sound doesn't get ignored also is much important to give much easier gameplay comprehension on this level

permalink

tysm guys! im not sure if i exactly followed both yall rhythms but i defo took the advice :3

permalink
Marked as resolved by Furox

00:45:967 (5,6,7) - since there's clap at 00:46:467 - you can tweak 00:45:967 (5,6,7) - to without sacrificing the vocal

permalink
permalink

yes

permalink
Marked as resolved by Furox

00:56:634 (5,6) - clap at 00:57:134 - so tweak like to capture it

permalink
permalink

ok

permalink
Marked as resolved by Furox

01:58:301 (4) - looks better if all circles to capture the clap impact. and/or to capture the long vocal too

permalink
permalink

yep nice

permalink
Marked as resolved by Furox

I think it's better to use a triple start from 01:58:134 if you want to actively map the clap at 01:58:467. Currently the first double 01:57:467 (2,3) falls on two vocals, while the second double 01:58:301 (4,5) - falls on 1/4 beat after two vocals. This is kinda misleading imo, as the player may think they are same and click 1/4 beat earlier for 4 and 5 - and get 50 or miss.

permalink
Reopened by -infinite-

Or alternatively use a 1/2 slider start at 01:57:134 to remove the first double. Since there are tons of doubles shifted 1/4 from vocals in this section so maybe this is indeed better in fitting the overall design(?)

permalink

i think triple is nice (not sure if i even did what ure saying but it sounds nicer now)

permalink
Marked as resolved by Furox

02:38:467 (6) - there's start of vocal on end slider so it's a bit hard to follow for newer when there's consecutives 1/4 chain around it, so it's better if u only use a circle and give 1/2 gap instead

permalink

i think i did what u meant

permalink
Marked as resolved by Furox

02:47:134 (1,2) - this kind of overlap (partially overlap sliderbody and opposite direction) is a bit too much in Normal imo. smth like this https://kanatama.s-ul.eu/aq7dUs9a would be more intuitive to Normal players

permalink

ok true

permalink
Marked as resolved by Furox

03:06:301 (2) - considering #4270202, could do to cover the snare

permalink

wud be similar to 03:03:134 (1,2,3,4) -

permalink

yeaa

permalink
Marked as resolved by Furox

03:08:467 - pretty minor, decrease vol to around 30% since it's only to gib feedback on that pitch change on mid-vocal

using whistle also give a nice touch to accentuate the end of the song.

permalink

sounds good, did both

permalink
Marked as resolved by Furox
/