00:05:929 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - using kick sliders here means player will have to click 1/2 not 1/4, and stacking them means no aim strain so you're really lowering activity here for no reason, suggest either a really low spaced stream or keep the sliders and make them spaced so activity is maintained
yea second part is like that due to the crash symbal, you would make them stream tho ? (the other instance) ?
I was kinda skeptical of doing it
00:10:774 (12,1) - is there a particular reason why the 1 is so spaced while in all the part have 00:04:228 (12,1) - somewhat kind of stacked circle. I don't really understand since you do not use a concept like spacing more and more the start of stream but only here its really spaced. 00:14:046 (4,1) - even this really loud sound isn't spaced like that
00:28:569 (1,2,3,4) - I feel like these slider shapes don't fit, since the only other instance of it in that part is 00:33:751 (1) , while the rest of the part has sliders like these 00:29:796 (3) 00:31:978 (5)
I don't really get your logic with the ncing in section like 00:43:569 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,1,2,3) - 00:25:569 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3) - where every burst exept 00:26:251 (4) - this one is nced. maybe just try to nc every start of burst. (if there is a good reason = all goods)
00:45:478 (5) - since the vocal lands here i think the start of this stream 00:45:615 (6,7,8,9,10) - should be here, with that slider being moved to 00:45:342
00:50:933 (7) - since there are 1/2 vocals here, i think you could do something similar to 01:02:660 (1,2,3) -
00:52:565 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - maybe gradually decrease the spacing here? copy pasting the same rhythm doesn't really reflect the lowering toms on each beat
01:08:929 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - this is usually linear flow (01:12:202 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - 01:15:474 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) ) could change to something linear for consistency?
01:20:247 (6,1) - ctrl g rhythm? the strong vocal is on 01:20:520 - and having it land on a slider end is kinda odd as it doesn't give proper feedback imo
oh im not following the vocal here, im following the sound every white tick for pattern change
Agree with first one, but the snare on the second one is too pre-dominant to ignore it. I'll keep it as it is
02:05:387 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36) - would reduce spacing by 0.1 to make a better buildup for the spaced stream afterward
02:51:206 (1,2) - slider are a bit too spaced out 02:50:387 (1,2) - considering these are the same sounds
02:58:706 (2,1,2,3,4) - idk if its just me but this can probably be misread as the (2) being the same spot for the start of that stream, if it's actually an issue you could rearrange the stream to start closer to the middle (would also make it play better imo)
03:05:251 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - i think these should be more emphasized coming off of 03:04:842 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - since the snare and cymbal is much more prominent than the preceding part
03:42:952 (4) - this sound is super weak maybe 03:42:883 (3,4) - make this a kick slider so the weaker sound isnt active and has contrast?
04:03:206 (1,2) - for having different rhythm these sliders should probably differ from one another
I don't trully agree , the spacing is is smaller than what the 1/2 slider are afterwards
and previously the theme of slower/faster slider was there while being mroe manageable. Feels like it's intuitive enough as it is
True, i think for playability sake and better transition i can keep that blue tick unmap, will resolve it for now
05:46:296 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - would make this stream different than the rest considering the drumroll here
06:48:751 (2,3,4,5) - 06:49:296 (1,2,3,4,5) - this emphasis is pretty cool, but I think having 06:48:751 (2,3,4,5) - this a bit more spaced would be cool for the transition and it would play better imo.
Full suggestion but maybe increasing progressivly the spacing burst 06:50:933 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - would be cool like each pair of 3 burst got a increase of spacing for each pair of 3. (sorry if its really unclear lol)