Dai Dai Dai Dai Daisuki na Kimi e <3 (TV Size)

00:03:361 (3361|3) - Would Be Better To Delete This. // Tbh This Feel Weird To Play, Just Follow The Piano On White Would Be Good(Also Normal Doesnt Use 1/2 Here)
Same: 00:04:611 (4611|0) -

00:06:642 (6642|3,7580|3) - What Is This Note Following For? Delete Them & Follow Vocal 00:07:423 - Here Are Better // Better To Stay Following Vocal Here, Keep It Simple & Easy To Understand

00:20:080 (20080|1,20288|3,20496|0,20705|2,20913|1,21121|3,21330|0,21538|1,21746|2,21955|3) - (Personal Opinion But Strongly Recomended) I Dont Think Using Long 1/3 Could Be Handled By New Player Especially At 192 BPM.
How About Simplify Them By Using 1/1 LN On 00:20:080 - 00:20:705 - And Use 3x 1/3 On 00:21:330 - 00:21:538 - 00:21:746 - (Why 3x 1/3 Here? Its To Emphasize High Pitch Melody), Then Just Ignore 00:21:955 - Cymbal Here, We Have New Focus To Follow Melody Here So By Deleting It, Wont Breaking The Tempo

00:20:080 (20080|3,20392|2,20705|1,21017|3) -
I strongly disagree how you map this part.
First, 00:20:392 (20392|2) - and 00:21:017 (21017|3) - is ghost note. I strongly disagree you use note for nothing in Easy diff because we usually do dump like that in high diffs.
Second, the 3/4 melody here is intense but you just use.. 1/1 LN to express them? You actually could do like this:

00:25:705 (25705|3) - Would You Mind To Move This To Col 2(1|2|3|4) ? So It Wont Share Same Collumn With 00:25:080 (25080|3) - . // Just Slight Detail To Give Better Gameplay Experience

00:28:986 (28986|2,29142|3,29767|2,30080|3) - This Bit Not Good To Play, Feel Bit Forcing Right Hand. How About Change Like This:
Screenshot
Note: 00:30:080 (30080|3) - Feel Much Better To Use 1/1 LN Here, But Optional So Decision Is Yours

00:34:455 - Till 00:35:548 - Col 4 Is Empty, Would You Mind To Re-arrange Them?
Example

De 00:38:830 a 00:39:455 y de 00:41:330 a 00:41:955 creo que deberían de ser iguales o similares. Por otra parte, en la misma sección, 00:39:298 (39298|2) - esta representado pero en 00:41:798 no. Podrías elegir un patrón a seguir, si la LN o las dos notas y luego el doble

00:39:298 - Normal Doesnt Have Note On Red, Ur Reason Is To Follow That Melody Right? But Seems U Not Following Same Sound At 00:41:642 - , So It Cause This Pattern Inconsistent. Better To Ignore Note There. // Stay 1/1 On It And Can Make 00:38:673 (38673|0,38830|1) - Them Played Using Different Hand Since Other Same Sound Always Played Using Different Hand
Note: If U Confused, Make It Similar Like 00:43:673 (43673|0,43830|3,44142|2,44455|0,44455|1) -

Teniendo en cuenta 00:45:548 (45548|1) - , podrías añadir una nota en 00:46:173

00:45:548 (45548|1,46173|1) - Any Reason Why U Mapped This? I Cant Find The Reason Behind It

00:45:705 (45705|2) - this should be a 1/1 LN to be consistent with 00:46:330 (46330|0) -

00:51:330 (51330|1) - this may be the instrrument in the background. But the vocal is more obvious here. I'd recommend you to do like this:

00:57:267 (57267|2,57580|1,57892|2,58205|3,58361|2,58517|1,58673|0,58830|2) - Vs 00:54:767 (54767|2,55080|2,55392|0,55548|3,55861|2,56017|0,56173|1,56330|3) - Bit Weird To Play The 2nd One (00:56:955 - ) Cz Structure Not Same. How About Change Like This
Screenshot

Se entiende la razón de 01:01:017 (61017|2,61330|2,61642|2) - pero podrías hacer que 01:01:330 (61330|2) - se mueva a la otra mano. Al ser sonidos diferentes, se podría cambiar tranquilamente

01:06:798 - Missed Double? Cymbal+Kick

01:17:423 (77423|2,77580|1,78048|0,78205|2,78361|1,78517|3) - This Is Bit Tempo Breaking, I Recomend To Use Simple 1/1 Here. Feel's Not Nice To Forcing Vocal Here
Example

01:21:486 (81486|2,81642|1,81798|0,81955|3,82111|2,82267|0,82423|2,82423|3) - es una Easy. Según RC, hay que evitar elk uso de más de 5 notas en 1/2

01:28:830 (88830|3,88986|2,89142|1,89298|3,89298|0) - This Is Way Harder Than Normal Diff, Consider To Nerf This Part
Example