Chu-pri mapped by lenpai‬ · beatmap discussion‬ | ‭osu!‬

beatmap discussion

1

mapped by lenpai

submitted 11 Sep 2023

last updated 5 days ago

New Discussion

Please sign in to post or reply

Discussions

00:11:058

00:11:058 - 00:11:225 - think they should be double based on the synth

18 days ago

18 days ago

18 days ago

00:11:392 - i did a temporary layer nerf as prep for the triple stack at 00:11:392 -

though, i can double 00:11:058 - for better consistency so that only the 1/2 before the triple stack is nerfed

5 days ago

Marked as resolved by lenpai

00:33:058

00:33:058 - i never seen quad for non cym up to this one so idk if this is intended

18 days ago

yuh reduced

5 days ago

Marked as resolved by lenpai

00:38:892

00:38:892 - double here for the loud clap''?

18 days ago

its gonna play a little weird with an extra note on 5 or 7, so using the spacebar col for the stack (plus the visual w/e) is a way to cover it

5 days ago

Marked as resolved by lenpai

00:44:725

00:44:725 - 00:46:725 - why quad here

18 days ago

nerfed and rearranged

5 days ago

Marked as resolved by lenpai

00:57:892

00:57:892 - should be double on vocal

18 days ago

18 days ago

can i nerf 01:00:558 (60558|4) - instead? (cause double usage)

01:08:558 -with the extra note is gonna play extra weird, so sticking to the big chords on the more accented vocals would be good enough imo

5 days ago

01:05:725

01:05:725 - airitai
-> 01:06:058 - have higher pitch but 5 notes but 01:05:725 - I think the 6 notes should have been on 01:06:058 -

18 days ago

yus

5 days ago

Marked as resolved by lenpai

01:16:058

01:16:058 - idk why the use of 5 notes chord here when u compare with the 01:16:392 - 01:16:725 - which have same effect but only quad

18 days ago

with the connection at 01:15:725 (75725|6,75725|5,75725|1,75725|3,75725|0,75892|3,76058|6,76058|2,76058|3,76058|0,76058|4) -

I only have the option to do a 5-note or a 3-note
or choose an approach thats like non-sym, which i would prefer not to

then the "mite ne" part being bracket is kind of like a compromise for the vocal cause i cant do a directional chord arrangement, that kinda messes with the sym previously

5 days ago

Marked as resolved by lenpai

"5-note or 3-note chord at the end of the col 4 anchor"*

5 days ago

01:17:225

01:17:225 (77225|5,77225|0,77225|6,77225|1,77225|3) - from what i see
this sound here isn't the same as the strong sound where u mapped it with 5 notes
it's pretty noticeable too so I think I would be better if you remove at least 1-2 notes from this one

18 days ago

ok

5 days ago

Marked as resolved by lenpai

01:31:725

01:31:725 - kick + vocal, should be at least triple from ur mapping rules

18 days ago

i actually think kicks arent part of my layering
cause i cant hear them when i made the map

5 days ago

Marked as resolved by lenpai

01:33:225

01:33:225 - should be double on vocal like u did before

18 days ago

ye

5 days ago

Marked as resolved by lenpai

01:38:225

01:38:225 - triple
01:38:058 - 01:35:392 - double

see 01:35:225 - use triple on kick + vocal

00:28:892 - triple

18 days ago

ok

5 days ago

Marked as resolved by lenpai

01:40:392

01:40:392 - just vocal, idt it should be quad
see here only triple 01:40:058 -

18 days ago

yea

5 days ago

Marked as resolved by lenpai

01:41:892

01:41:892 - vocal + snare/clap so triple?

18 days ago

ya

5 days ago

Marked as resolved by lenpai

01:53:725

01:53:725 - and parts like this idk why the chord is at quad,

lower vocal density than 01:54:058 - but same note count

would suggest to reduce to triple

18 days ago

yeah sure, i thought that specific vocal could use extra emphasis but not eally

5 days ago

Marked as resolved by lenpai

/

›

›

›

›