The Purge MarchExplicit

00:01:782 (4) - 00:03:521 (4) - 00:05:115 (1) - etc. I can guarantee you that these are sound samples played at 1/6 on repeat. So I'd prefer that these sliders are in 1/6 rather than 1/12, but I can understand if you want the extra buzz

00:16:854 (1,2,3) - Maybe something more symertrical like this? Currently feels out of place compared to the other patterns in this section which co-exist with each other

00:31:419 (3,4) - i feel that this jump is a bit overdone compared to similar ones (00:24:245 (2,3,4,5,1) - ). There is no cue in the music as the vocal is really really constant here. Can bump a bit for transition but i feel it's a bit too much. Maybe ~3.0x DS is a good distance here?

00:37:289 (1,2,1,2) - 00:51:637 (1,2,3,4) - 1,2 사이의 간격을 일부 늘려볼 의향 있으십니까? 전부 드럼음이 있는데도, 잔잔한 00:31:202 (1,2,3,4) - 00:32:289 (1,2,3,4) - 등과 같은 패턴을 가질 이유는 없는 것 같습니다.

00:37:724 (1) - this angle is a bit eeeh flow wise and aesthetic wise. Maybe ctrl H so can leverage circular flow a bit?

00:41:645 (1,2) - mayb move this up a bit to not be so close to 00:41:101 (1) -

00:45:123 (1,2) - were these not supposed to be visually aligned

00:47:289 (3,1,2) - Could move this up more towards x:288 y:22 to give similar spacing to 00:46:637 (1,2,3,1,2,3)

00:51:645 - i think that u put 00:51:862 (3,4) - under the sliderend of 00:51:427 (2) - is less cool than repeating the idea of 00:50:775 (1,2,1,2) - (basically, maybe move 00:51:862 (3,4) - to stack under the sliderhead of 00:51:427 (2) - )

01:04:688 (3) - would NC this to highlight the rhythmic change

01:22:723 (5) - eeeh this feels kinda iffy because theres nothing buzzing or holding that long. I think it will be nicer if you shorten this to 01:23:103 and add circle at 01:23:158 for the vocals it would match the music more?

also sudden sliderslide hs at 01:35:548 weirdge

01:30:339 (2,3,4) - could maybe look even or something? currently pattern is kinda lopsided

01:32:940 (1,2,1,2) - 드럼음에 차이가 일부 있기에 약간의 패턴 변주를 줘 보는 것도 좋을 것 같다고 생각합니다.

01:34:244 (1) - A bit too long i think. If this were shortened to 01:35:114 and add a circle at 01:35:983 it would fit the held vocal more i think. also active big sound is tasty

01:41:200 (2,3) - im assuming you're trying to map piano. It feels weird to me because there is a piano sound on 01:41:345 this and it's skipped lol.
I think can add that circle and stick with 01:41:526 (3) - on 1/4 or can simplify everything to 1/3.

01:43:817 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - I don't exactly feel like the increasing 1/4 jumps here are exactly justified by the song as there is nothing in those drums that really seems to be increasing in intensity or anything.

I feel like making them similar to the first iteration (01:42:947 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - ) would make a bit more sense in terms of what the song does.

01:46:425 - OK idk what about this pattern it is but i failed there like 6 times before resorting to NF just to pass it, i think the thing plays kinda bad tho

pattern is fitting, but kinda hard diffspike basically. dunno if you want to adjust it

01:46:852 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,1,2) - 빌드업 때문이라고는 하지만, 여기같이 음이 매우 약한 곳에서 이런 간격 채용 상당히 좋은 선택은 아닌 것 같습니다.

01:54:034 (2) - maybe clean this up a bit?

01:58:918 (2,1,2) - Would give more spacing to this so it's more consistent to 00:47:615 (2,1,2) , maybe something like

01:59:461 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - idk what i feel about this because i feel this is actually much easier than let's say 00:48:158 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - because of a lot of circular movement. I think it loses like the shuffle between tiny spacing shuffle and big 1/4 jumps you have going on in this diff

Would decrease spacing

02:04:686 - somehow these are not as hype as 00:53:384 - , but especially that you repeat them in 02:11:643 - is a bit lame, the star patterns from 01:00:340 - were funny; would maybe use something similar or at least something more difficult?

02:20:338 - nc?

02:27:504 (1) - would move this a bit closer to 02:27:613 (2) - for better acceleration feeling (like 02:25:657 (2,3,4,5) - )