Last Wish

can u mute spinnerends? 00:00:000 (1) -

00:18:071 don't rly like how you skipped a sound here, imo it could be mapped aswell

00:31:714 (3) - mute sliderend & slidertick

00:32:714 (2,1) - would swap this to dash instead because no kick to emphasize to

00:39:052 (4,5,6) - don't like how this is currently shaped especially these notes 00:39:302 (5,6) after (4). You could move this whole pattern to x:170 and move (6) to x:70.

00:44:177 (4,5,6) - and 00:52:177 (4,5,6) - both patterns r fine but make them the same, either one or th other

01:01:552 - spinner or slider

01:30:052 (4,5) - would make these exactly the same (horizontal) because the piano pitch here is the same, this would also be consistent with what you did for 01:30:302 (6,7) -

01:36:542 (1) - this antiflow might be a little harsh after all these tapdashes, maybe ctrl+g for better flow?

01:36:552 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - this buildup is too harsh for what it emphasizes, would suggest nerfing
it's also pretty uncomfortable with the movements here 01:36:427 (4,1) - as this transition to a rhythm change is very abrupt

01:40:435 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - why does this require lots of movement while this 01:38:552 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - doesn't? i'd make it all standstillable as it's a buildup (that's not even that intense)

01:51:608 (1,2,3,4) - this pattern doesn't emphasize the wubby bursts that well and i think it'll be better if you map these as 1/8 jumpy kicksliders (or smth like that) cuz this looks messy & doesn't play that well

01:53:108 (4,5) - make 4 more vertical and/or nerf 4,5 spacing

01:54:394 (2) - can make this horizontal too so that 01:52:465 (1,2) - doesnt stick out as being the only wiggl

02:02:108 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - ctrl+shift+s these to 1.0. they play like the slider velocity here is 1.3x which is somewhat edgy for what it shud be

02:07:787 (4,5,6) - this spacing is quite ambiguous for this 1/8 I'd shorten the spacing a bit. This one works well 02:02:537 (2,3,4) as an example.

02:08:751 (1,2,3) - the stop after a movement heavy part is jarring and might cause misses on 2 or 3, make it < shaped instead

02:11:108 (2,3) - might make them moveable instead of making them standstill?

02:12:822 (4,5) - HDash spacing could be increased imo it really fits well with addition to the next transition

02:32:114 (1,2,3,4,5) - the 1.1x distance between sliders and circles is quite straining especially with how the pattern is structured (straight line from the right to the left) so i'd suggest moving the circles so the distance is 1.0x and it's less jarring

02:44:914 (1,2,3) - why is 2 not centered between 1 and 3. im mad

02:55:214 (7) - I think this slider could be a tiny bit more horizontal since it looks a bit jammed compare to 02:55:114 (6)

03:00:614 (5,6,7,1,2,3) - needs an antiflow & tightness reduction overall (5,6,7 being the biggest offender, remarkably easy to just miss the sliderend), many ways to fix this but i think the easiest fix is just makign 6 vertical

7,1 is also a bit tight but its not as bad

03:11:603 why is this part empty? adding a spinner for vocals would b a cool touch

03:46:103 (5) - wrong rhythm, it's 1/2 + there should be a 1/4 circle afterwards 03:46:290

04:05:790 - missing note I Think

04:09:603 (1) onwards - wrong rhythm being used do this instead

04:27:728 (2,3) - rhythm here is wrong shouldn't 04:27:728 (2) be circled and 04:27:915 mapped?

04:29:603 (1,3) - tbh I don't like these reverses that much. They're out of nowhere and only makes this specific moment harder for a second. Would make the movement more flowy than antiflowy.

04:31:603 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - this pattern doesn't emphasize the song as much as it can imo,

i'd 04:31:603 (1,2) - make this a 3-circled hyperchain + a circle (smth like this)

04:32:103 (5,6) - this can be a different type of stream since the pitch is drastically different from 04:31:853 (3,4) - , don't understand why it's mapped as the same pattern

04:48:603 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - i'd do smth else here this pattern is quite uncomfortable to catch in its entirety probably due to awkwardly placed 3/4s

05:28:103 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - could look more interesting with spacing variation, even if changing it inflates sr lol

05:30:103 (1) - i do not rly know if thats rankable since it probably counts as doubling the bpm but the effect is cool, will ask zerokt to give his input