00:39:211 (5,1) - don't think this antispacing makes sense since you used high spacing as emphasis every other time this phrase in the music comes around, for example 01:52:623 (5,1) - 03:08:858 (5,1,2) - 00:50:505 (5,6,1) - etc.
00:47:800 (5,1) - similar thoughts as above
02:01:447 (1) - emphasizing an important sound with the end of a slider is a fine mapping technique but only using it here makes it feel out of place, consider changing it to emphasize the cymbal crash with a clickable object
sure changed first two but think third one is fine + i wanna have a small break here considering the sudden difficulty of this pattern and rhythm 02:00:152 (1,1,2,1,2,3) -
00:40:741 (5) - Similarly for this too, circle at 00:40:976 means you can have 00:40:270 (2,3,4,5,1) this rhythm all as a coherent unit which I think would work pretty well.
00:45:211 (6,1) - While it's playable, this sort of spacing kinda comes out a bit suddenly since everything else so far has been much lower. Would probably at least halve the current distance.
01:00:152 (1,2,1,2,3) - i completely misread 01:00:858 (1) - thought it was 2/3 slider and shitbroke and im mad so im going to tell you to change it
03:22:035 (1) - Stacking this last note kinda ruins the aesthetic a bit and makes the last part of the stream kinda cramped. Would probably just keep with the accelerating thing you started with 03:21:682 (1,2,3).