beatmap discussion
Fight Against the Past
Tsukimi Shizuka x LUNARiUM
New Discussion
Discussions
✔️ ❌❔
Background:
- Dimensions: 1920 x 1080 ✔️
- Size: 1.8 Mb ❔
It is technically rankable but I (Ryax) have compressed it more, here's the file: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1080884414566912002/1121500225874427914/compress-min.jpg
Audio: ❌
- Spek/Spectro:
The audio does not match the criteria for ranked, having a really weird cutoff at around 16khz (17.5 or more required for ranked) so it should be changed. The mapper has asked the artist directly for an .ogg file.
Timing will be updated once the .ogg has been received.
Song Folder: ✔️
Timing: ✔️
HP/OD: ❌
- HP: 5 ❌
The HP is far too low for a high difficulty map such as this.
In this case, having really dense rice and also LN patterns I would suggest to keep it around 7.5 at most. If you want to use 8 it is fine too IMO.
OD: 8.5 ❔
Subjective but since this has many tricky LN patternings that do result hard when it comes to accuracy I'd lower it down to 7.8/7.9.
Hitsounds: ❔
- This map requires a hitnormal file. Snuck one out from an already ranked mapset. It's not obligatory but it's highly recommended.
Metadata: ✔️
-> Artist/Romanised Artist: 月見 静華 x LUNARiUM
-> Title/Romanised Title: Tsukimi Shizuka x LUNARiUM
-> Source: osu!mania 4K Chinese National Cup 2022
-> Current Tags: MCNC 4K 2022 GF TB tiebreaker _Stan [Crz]Alleyne Yueast 2018 Kuiiiiteeee
-> Some suggestions:
- 'Grand Finals' : Extended version of 'GF'
- 'Mania Chinese National Cup' : Extended version of 'MCNC'
- 'Electronic Instrumental Trance Freeform Hardcore UK Hardcore' : Instrumental tags
- 'Tech LN Long Note Stream Technical' : Patterning tags.
-> Final Tags:
- MCNC 4K 2022 GF TB tiebreaker _Stan [Crz]Alleyne Yueast 2018 Kuiiiiteeee Grand Finals Mania Chinese National Cup Electronic Instrumental Trance Freeform Hardcore UK Hardcore Tech LN Long Note Stream Technical
Sources:
On an unrelated note:
The current preview point doesn't quite match the actual core of the song so I'd suggest moving it to 03:27:379 - .
AiMod
03:41:567 (221567|1) -
03:41:900 (221900|1) -
03:42:108 (222108|3) -
03:42:191 (222191|0) -
03:43:065 (223065|1) -
03:43:273 (223273|2) -
03:43:357 (223357|1) -
03:43:897 (223897|2) -
03:44:438 (224438|2) -
03:50:847 (230847|3) -
03:51:179 (231179|1) -
03:52:344 (232344|1) -
03:53:843 (233843|2) -
03:55:007 (235007|2) -
04:00:832 (240832|0) -
04:01:998 (241998|1) -
These are all unsnapped by 1ms, just click on them and they'll be fine. Make sure to check back once you're done just in case I missed something.
Last edited by [GB]Rick .
General Post:
00:08:156 (8156|2,8156|3,8593|0,9030|1) - Honestly the gradual releasing of these LNs looks pretty unnecessary to me because:
- The melody does not gradually fade, it's simple piano sounds all ending at once;
- Such snapping is completely unjustifiable.
Something going along these lines is
00:09:321 (9321|3,9339|2,9357|1,9375|0) - . Not against gracing these LNs at all but I do feel like saying that there is a potentially better way to represent this avoiding quirky 1/16 releases.
First off, I'd rather make 00:09:339 (9339|2,9357|1) - rice mostly for consistency but also because the piano sound does not need 1/16 gracing at all.
Secondly, would move 00:09:375 (9375|0) - to 00:09:394 - for the reason above.
To make it short, something like this should work (I also included the way I'd fix the earlier suggestion):
General Post:
04:56:505 (296505|3,296505|0,296505|1) - Would make the note on col 2 a 1/2 LN here, the synth sound is kinda evident here.
04:56:724 - Missing synth sound here actually. It would be better if you shortened 04:56:651 (296651|1) - To 1/4 directly since there's no long synth sounds here. It would need some rearranging too, something similar to this may be fitting:
04:57:015 - Note here was removed (ghost note, no synth sounds there)
04:56:797 - LN here was removed and the triple became a double since it was too limiting and there weren't any other possible ways to make this idea work
04:56:724 (296724|1,296942|3) - These notes became 1/2 LNs due to the longer synth sounds that they're supposed to represent.
General Post:
03:35:534 - -> 03:36:699 -
03:35:534 - Avoid this polyrhythmic burst, use a 1/8. No rearrangements needed, you can simply follow the flow of the burst that came before.
03:35:801 (215801|1,215850|0) - This burst is pretty ambiguous, it's really different from everything else so I'd rearrange it to something like this:
I also simplified the burst on the blue line. Ignore everything that isn't highlighted.
03:36:117 - -> 03:36:699 -
This burst was mapped in a really complex way that didn't really feel nice while playing so I'd suggest a complete simplification of it:
From now on you can complete the kiai by either copypasting and mirroring this each time or shuffle the notes by always following what we said.
Here is an .osz in case you misunderstood anything:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cb3MZC3KvRu7WyZpP8DvLV-HWCWISDhV/view?usp=sharing
The file containing this section has as difficulty name 'xz1z1z help'. It also has extra additions such as mapped buildups to not make everything repetitive.
Good luck!
General Post 1:
03:27:379 - -> 04:02:330 - This segment is the map's biggest issue. I asked pre-epsilon players to test this and what they mostly said is that it plays uncomfortable and that it does create a relevant difficulty spike that stands out in the entire chart. Although there are ways to fix this, the solutions I will list under this post are really gamechanging. Most dumps do not feel fitting while playing, since they get lost in a bunch of super high BPM bursts. Comfortability has to be improved drastically. 03:27:379 (207379|1,207428|2,207476|0,207525|1,207525|3,207597|2,207597|0,207670|1,207670|3,207719|2,207767|3) - This section can definitely have more comfortable outcomes. Shuffling some note positionings, you can have a pattern that does look denser but that does play better. Though playability here isn't my only concern but I feel like that the sound at 03:27:597 - can be dumped on the spot, like you did with the following instances. Something like this can work: