mapped by Kuki1537
submitted
ranked
This beatmap was ranked on 1 March 2022!
nominated by Sonnyc and MeAqua tete
New Discussion
Please sign in to post or reply
Discussions
Sort by

00:14:264 (4,1) - What about ending the rhythm at (4), or at least nerfing the jump? The sound at 00:14:414 - is really calm, and giving a huge jump simply doesn't feel right.

permalink

👍

permalink
Marked as resolved by Kuki1537

00:18:614 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,3,4,1,2,3) - maybe nerf those jumps for contrast with 00:22:514 (1,2,1,2,3) - because those 1-2s have stronger sound so it should have some more spacing than the others ig?

permalink
permalink
Marked as resolved by My Angel DT

why that much of a spacing? 01:00:164 (4,5) -

permalink
Reopened by My Angel DT

1 they are more spaced and the movement differs
2 ^
3 cuz double snare (wrong hs there unlucky)

permalink
Marked as resolved by Kuki1537

ye I see that they are more spaced but I mean like in a more noticeable way

permalink

the movement differs aswell, its way sharper and more back-forth

permalink

00:24:614 (3,4,1) - could rotate by a 90 degrees counterclockwise so u end up with a stronger emphasis on the transition to the other section of the song due to flow change

permalink

k

permalink
Marked as resolved by Kuki1537

00:43:964 (2,5,6) - can you try spacing (5,6) closer, and (2,5) bigger? The transition towards the 1/4 slider rhythm didn't felt smooth enough because the visual spacing being too similar for different rhythms.

permalink

sureeee

permalink
Marked as resolved by Kuki1537

00:46:364 (1) - u use the same angle all throughout the map but you only break it once here, which kinda makes this slider look out of place a bit, you could potentially 00:45:764 (4,5,6,7,1) - by a few degrees clockwise or just use one of the more default angles for 00:46:364 (1) -

permalink

yus!

permalink
Marked as resolved by Kuki1537

00:48:764 - u could probably try to make this active just like you did with 00:43:964 (1) - for more consistency + nicer emphasis

permalink

another solution would be just moving 00:48:914 (2) - further from 00:48:564 (1) - to the movement from 00:48:564 (1) - 's end is more demanding and thus has more emphasis

permalink

moved 2

permalink
Marked as resolved by Kuki1537

00:53:564 (1) - could either shorten it down to 1/4th for more oomph on the drums or extend it to 1/1 for cute vocals

permalink

yues

permalink
Marked as resolved by Kuki1537

01:02:864 (1,2) - What about starting the combo from (2) instead? Looks like you added at the current spot for the finish, but the new vocal phrase seems pretty strong to set the combo this way.

permalink

👍

permalink
Marked as resolved by Kuki1537

01:08:939 - you miss an important drum sound here, could turn 01:08:864 (4) - into a 1/4th slider so that the sound gets some more representation

permalink

yes

permalink
Marked as resolved by Kuki1537

01:13:814 (1) - i know that youre trying to follow the drums here but with how repeated the vocals r you could potentially opt for a circle + 1/2 slider here instead so u get full emphasis on the vocals as well

permalink

ye

permalink
Marked as resolved by Kuki1537

01:19:439 (3) - remove circle? I think 1/4 clicks happened too frequently

permalink

i think its fine since they are followed by sliders so it becomes slightly more lenient

permalink
Marked as resolved by Kuki1537
/