00:18:382 (2,3,4,5) - awkward flow, try to keep the same circular flow you have such as in 00:19:651 (4,5,6,7). I suggest making the 2-3-4 circles flow clockwise like this: https://gyazo.com/14f814d82e711da2fbc90a967492bdfd
00:18:382 (2) - NC this instead of 00:18:151 (1) to stay consistent with 00:16:305 (8,1)
NC 00:20:228 (8) too
00:20:805 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - i would probably rethink this rhythm and use what you used at 00:15:266 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) because it's very awkward to play 00:20:805 (2), even though there is a sound there that may call for a slider it's very sudden and will confuse the player
00:33:728 (3,4,1) - jump is too intense, maybe overlap the sliderend of 4 with 00:33:497 (1)
00:34:651 (7) - instead of having the 7 here, which breaks the flow from 7 to 8, I would have it on the left side of 00:34:420 (4,5,6)
00:38:343 (8,9,10,11,1) - would make this pattern more like a triangle like this: https://gyazo.com/6f23c76c970ae44a7caa4db69416b42c
01:16:882 (1,2,3,4,5) - i don't think 260bpm cross screen jumps fit here compared to the rest of the section
01:27:497 (1) - rotate this by -45 it will look better (stack the sliderend on the spinner)
I personally disagree. It indeed does fold around the 4th note which looks clean, but I will have to improvise for the spacing between the 2nd slider and 4th note to look cleaner. Not only that, the sliders look a bit off. I will keep this into consideration though. For now, I changed it so that both sliders are equally around the 4th hit circle.
01:51:497 (3,4,5,6) - i don't think spacing should be equal between all notes here when the rhythmic spacing is definitely different
01:52:536 (5,6,1,2) - space the circle-sliders out more because the spacing conflicts with the rhythm at 01:51:497 (3,4,5,6)
03:05:805 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - you didn't build up for jumps of this intensity so I would either nerf this or buff the part before it because the slider jumps at 03:03:036 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) are much more calm than that jump section