(my first attempt at constructive critism orz)
I have played Saten's map a lot and i can definitely say that i prefer your version. Saten's map have a lot of random jumps that doesn't match the song at all. I never understood why he chose to put the jump where he put them and it always feels wrong to play it, especially in HD when i'm relying on the music a lot. It's one of the only jump map i never really liked (and i love jump maps overall). In your map the jump makes way more sense and that's why overall it's way more pleasant to play for me.

I will never say that your map is better than saten's (because seriously, you can't judge a map objectively) but i can safely say that i appreciated it better.

I don't say it's perfect though. There are stil some patterns that bugged me (like 03:37:459 (4,1) - 03:41:459 (4,1) - etc... for example) and i also think the overall aesthetic could be improved. As it stands this is mostly the same angular jumps used over and over with some blankets (and some of them are off like 01:48:126 (2,3)) which quickly feels very repetitive. Especially on a 5min song.

But still, a NHI on a song that long is not really common and congratulation for mapping it alone and ranking it.

I love the Revelation difficulty better than Saten's @_@ it's actually really well done! good job :)

I, for one, prefer the increased object density and use of 1/2 sliders in saten's map. I believe this matches the intensity of the song pretty well (not to mention the 1000 fun cross screen jumps). There are quite a few 1/1 sliders in this version that I feel slow down the pace of the song (saten's version also had a few 1/1 sliders but I feel they were placed more appropriately). However, this version is pretty well mapped and having two versions will mean someone who can't play saten's set can still enjoy the song with this version.