Sure, I'll play.
Your example seems to be a bit misleading to me. In this example, Two was the first to get lynched, not LadySuburu. Unless you meant to say that person 1 was the one to unvote, making LadySuburu the first to start the tie.Two wrote:
7. A tied vote will go to the player who reached the tie first. Example: vote:Two, vote:LadySuburu, vote:Two, vote:LadySuburu, vote:Two, unvote:Two would result in LadySuburu being lynched.
I didn't mean it that way but I can see why it's confusing. I just meant that if someone who can roleblock gets night killed, their action will still go through.LadySuburu wrote:
I don't allow roleblocks to stop the mafia team's kill. If you choose to allow it to do so that's up to you though.
Also up to choice, but generally mafia's difference from WW other than lynches at majority is that mafia can choose not to kill.I meant that as a punishment for inactivity, so I don't have a problem adding that
Normally all night actions go through even if killed. Roleblock is all that stops them. (Though, I usually choose not to give cop results or anything if someone dies.) Actions like a doctor protection (in the event of multiple killers) still go through if the doc is killed.Two wrote:
I didn't mean it that way but I can see why it's confusing. I just meant that if someone who can roleblock gets night killed, their action will still go through.
that's the intention yeahLadySuburu wrote:
Edit: Just making sure I know what the rules are. As of now a kill basically acts as a roleblock.
That still doesn't make sense. Two was the first to get lynched, not LS.Two wrote:
2(two) 2 (ls)
3(two) 2 (ls)
2(ls) 2 (two)
it's not set in stone though so if people don't want it to be that way before the game starts I don't care
I think what Two means is that the person who had the highest number of votes directly prior to the tie is lynched.Swiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:
Better, but it still doesn't make any general sense. Who voted then later unvoted? (I'm specifically talking about the previous posts that you made)
..what?Swiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:
No. Look at his second example. Only one person each has been voted.
Two wrote:
Lilac: vote Two
0_o: vote LadySuburu
Two dies
Lilac: vote Two
0_o: vote LadySuburu
LadySuburu: vote Two
Chris: vote LadySuburu
Lilac: unvote Two
Lilac: vote Two <---- Wait, what?
LadySuburu dies <---- ^^
want to play Swiftwolf Yellowtail?
...after my confusion by reading a bit too hard, yes, this is correct.Two wrote:
Lilac: vote Two
0_o: vote LadySuburu
Two dies
Lilac: vote Two
0_o: vote LadySuburu
LadySuburu: vote Two
Chris: vote LadySuburu
Lilac: unvote Two
Lilac: vote Two
LadySuburu dies
Well, considering the fact that my last game was a huge screw-up, probably not. But who knows, I may join this one and find a different tactic. (Then again, the only thing that caught me off guard was someone's method of playing... >_> You know who you are.)Two wrote:
want to play Swiftwolf Yellowtail?
Funny, I was going to do just that. Is this guy new or something?Rolled wrote:
unvote.
vote: Swiftwolf Yellowtail
Do you recall the last Mind Mafia?akrolsmir wrote:
Funny, I was going to do just that. Is this guy new or something?
Yeah... It's RVS.Swiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:
Oh, dear. Going to past games to get me killed again. Is this your strategy? Look, I know last game was a total mess, but believe me, I'm not going to run back to that round ever again.
Major over reaction to a vote.Swiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:
..okay.. everyone seems to be voting like there's no tomorrow. I'm not gonna vote right now, though, because it's a bit too soon for me to declare anyone as mafia, but I will say that DxS is a bit odd for throwing his vote on me. Why do you want me to start talking, anyway?
It should be obvious you know.Swiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:
How would that be a major overreaction? I just want an answer.
This guy knows what I do mean.NoHItter wrote:
Basically, you overreacted to a RVS vote.
Votes during RVS are usually placeholder votes that change upon someone doing something suspicious.
I almost never do anymore. lolWojjan wrote:
Vote: LS
not voting during RVS hmmmmm?
If not, its lynch or be lynched.Chris wrote:
swift it's obvious what you have to do to not get lynched
Swiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:
Chris: Actually, if I voted NoHitter right now, he'd be the one to get lynched if it was the last vote. He's the only one that was voted against before I was.
Man I wish my defense was as brilliant as this.Swiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:
You don't have any proof that I'm scum, or even suspicious. And don't bring up what's already been brought up, that doesn't work.
You missed at least one there. Trying to blame me for nothing hmmmmmmm?Chris wrote:
faceman
DxS
pieguy
lybydose
who did I missLybydose wrote:
You missed at least one there. Trying to blame me for nothing hmmmmmmm?Chris wrote:
faceman
DxS
pieguy
lybydose
sounds like you're just talking out of your ass unless you can tell me who I missedLybydose wrote:
You tell me since you seem to be so keen on everyone's posting habits here.