1. Easy (1.78 stars, 155 notes)
2. Kanpakyin's Hard (4.86 stars, 490 notes)
3. Normal (3.03 stars, 223 notes)
4. Sharon's (4.99 stars, 536 notes)
5. Taiko (4.94 stars, 1002 notes)

Numbers 596108 wrote:

Mod Request from wmfchris (From 596108's Mod Queue)

Before mod please read the meaning represented by the color

Color Help

Red -> Recommended
Orange -> Must to Fixed
Green -> Currect
Blue -> Don't fixed it...
Purple -> If you fixed the one,please fixed the pattern

Taiko

Timing :

00:00:554 130.00 BPM - N - -> OK
00:23:169 1.0x - N - -> Remove
00:41:169 1.0x - K - -> OK
00:55:477 1.0x - N - -> OK
01:56:861 1.0x - K - -> OK
02:11:630 1.0x - N - -> OK
02:26:405 1.0x - N - -> Remove
02:44:861 1.0x - K - -> OK
02:51:900 1.0x - N - -> Remove
[color=#0000BF]02:52:361 1.0x - K - -> Remove
03:14:400 1.0x - N - -> OK

Notes :

00:01:938 (7) - OK
00:10:015 (7) - same tone so it remains k
00:10:246 (9) - ^
00:14:861 (28) - ^
01:16:707 (210) - why does you put a finish note on this line? to emphasize the finishing
01:18:554 (218) - Change to small note? ^
01:23:169 (246,247) - :O ^

Others :

Skipped , as you said

• [General]

1. 如果不准备加SB的话osb就删了吧|_|

• [Normal]

1. 00:50:391 (4,5,6,1) - ...会不会有点太遮了0 0
2. 02:36:083 (5,6,1) - 还是建议空一个拍子出来
3. 这个……怎么说虽然是N但毕竟是最简单的难度。还是酌情减一点1/2单点比较好(?

• [KPY]

1. 00:10:698 (5,1) - spacing..
2. 00:29:160 (5,6,7) - ..由于stack的原因这里在正式玩的时候堆成一坨了||||
3. 01:34:468 (3,4,5) - ^
4. 00:47:852 (7,8) - 诶?....(再打一遍)居然很爽耶OAO..
5. 01:13:468 (1,2) - spacing
6. 01:16:237 (4) - ,.,.,,,,不会挡住分数条吗(

• [Sharon's]
  王墨凡的马子碰不得

1. whistle太难听了/_\替换一个吧
2. 01:56:391 (1,2,3) - N:C1
3. 03:12:429 (9,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - ……(眯眼
   ……改掉吧

1. 00:55:468處的KIAI line我建議移到00:55:929
2. kpy的難度可以改成叫Hard, 無論總分數或是玩起來的感覺都是Sharon難些

1. 00:15:314 (1) - 起頭S finish如何
2. 00:22:237 (5) - 70% vol綠線移來這, 音效明顯些
3. 00:29:852 (1) - 改成29:621起頭的repeat slider感覺更合音樂
4. 00:33:775 (1,2,3,4,5) - 這邊由於音樂本身(1,3,5)有鈸, (2,4)沒有, 導致聽起來比較小聲, 加音到90%好些
5. 00:55:929 (x) - 把結束的KIAI綠線也移來這, 或者對齊55:006的note
6. 01:20:852 (2) - 維持白線S finish? 音樂本身是有的, 可以漸漸降音
7. 01:37:929 (6) - +finish as 00:22:237
8. 02:04:237 (1) - +finish
9. 02:25:468 (4) - 我覺得結尾應該有個強點的音效(升音量的clap), 後面的(1)可以上finish
10. 02:55:698 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - 這段類似其他地方補上S finish?

1. 前奏的部份我覺得靜音sliderslide會好些
2. 00:33:314 (6) - 覺得remove finish好些
3. 00:39:314 (1) - 加new combo如何
4. 00:54:083 (1,2) - 覺得別理vocal全擺1/3比較好聽
5. 00:57:775 (1,2,3) - 和(4)的間距有點沒擺好, 全體右移1格(grid 3)
6. 01:10:698 (x) - (超nazi) Breakline手動拉來這
7. 01:49:006 (6) - 同00:33:314拔掉finish
8. 01:55:006 (5) - 同00:39:314加上NC
9. 02:09:775 (1,2) - 同樣理由建議用1/3
10. 02:43:006 (5) - 同樣理由NC

1. 像是22:698~29:160這種輕的段落要不要降點音量?
2. 00:22:006 (66,67,68) - del (67)並且一樣做成k K
3. 01:19:814 (227,228) - del (227)並且把(228)改成大圓比較有三連重音的感覺 (228,233,238)
4. 02:51:891和02:52:352的KIAI line沒對齊, 我不確定在太鼓diff是不是有rules問題

1. 前奏的部份我覺得靜音sliderslide會好些
2. Slider Tick Rate 2確實會幫助讀那些變速slider, 不過只是建議, 我覺得並不影響音效
3. 00:28:237 (1) - 改成whistle?
4. 00:53:852 (2,3,4) - 打起來有微妙的違合感..想辦法讓1/3 slider的起頭都在白線並且上finish?
5. 01:56:160 (x) - map here, 一致性並且感覺較好
6. 02:10:698 (3) - +finish
7. 02:31:929 (2) - 改成whistle?
8. 03:04:814 (1) - 我確實沒想到這裡藍線會有東西, spacing改成像其他標準的1/2間格一樣?
9. 03:11:391 (5,1) - 微妙違合感..說不上來..

1. Well, I can see a .osb in the file? but seems it's useless.
2. Isn't pending?
3. No Source?
4. seems lead-in 3000 has a bit too long. try 2500 or 2000? just saying
5. Ok,let's move on to the diffs

1. 00:14:852 (1) - You miss a Finish at long white line? add finish as well, sounds better.
2. 00:55:006 (3) - it has a bit hard for newbie imo , make the slider obviously? for example:
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 01:19:468 (2) - clap instead of finish? you can try to add clap here, finish sounds weird for me.
4. 03:14:391 (x) - also add a note (+finish) here? seems you miss a note here , add this can be more powerful imo.
5. That's it, good easy diff, like the slider<3

1. 用番中文, 圓圓可以再大多格?
2. 其實前part唔落clap? 雖然用background music clap呢個idea唔錯
3. 00:22:698 (1) - 暫時係前邊都冇一條Slider用4次來回 , 事實上有d fake, 因為我新手果時都死係到. 可以用3來回再加個note?打擊感都好d
   雖然都係個人化,不過都比個例子你
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:28:698 (4) - 呢到加個whislte 反而奇怪過clap , 所以都加clap好D
5. 00:52:006 (1) - 係尾,即係長白線到加Finish,呢個結尾可以再有力量D
6. 00:53:160 (3) - Slider最頭都要加,理由同上
7. 01:20:852 (2) - 你個大圓高手唔好可以miss咁多個finsih(?)(頭+尾) 我覺得這歌最正就係多finish (液)
8. 其實少左好多個,如果你有心情就落多D佢啦 (?)
9. 02:07:698 (1) - 其他唔落都好唔可以唔落呢個(?) 最like this
10. 02:08:852 (3) - ^
11. 03:08:852 (4) - repeat太長了, 搵個方法改改佢? 雖然你可以選擇keep (最好改啦,因為影響左流暢性)
12. 03:10:468 (1) - 呢part開始識做架啦(?)
13. 係咁多.冇Easy咁好, 不過都係冇咩問題

1. 00:14:391 (5,6,7) - 其實照道理冇問題, 不過想做得更好可以將呢3個note分開, 同一個位其實我覺得冇咁流暢.例如可以跟番spacing咁樣做?
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 01:10:698 (x) - 聽上去miss左粒note, 加個finish係到?
3. 01:30:083 (5,6,7) - 嗯 , 理由同上
4. 02:06:083 (7) - Stream冇問題,加個New combo係到?好睇D.
5. 03:08:852 (7) - ^
6. 做多D stream map <33

1. 這個Diff多了幾個tags, 問題存在(?)
2. 00:29:852 (7) - 呢邊有D難睇 , 不過玩上去冇問題,ups to u.
3. 00:41:160 (1) - 加個finsih更powerful<3
4. 01:10:583 (1,2,3) - 藍線起連打玩上去果時有D辛苦, 唔介意可以做Slider 1/4 ? 可以偉高可玩性
5. 01:59:160 (9) - 後邊D NC開始亂 , 跟我一步一步咁做, 呢個先開nc
6. 02:00:083 (1) - remove nc
7. 02:00:545 (5) - 最後係到NC就最好了
8. 02:10:237 (2) - 加少左個Finish?
9. 02:10:698 (3) - 呢到都最好加埋^
10. 03:11:391 (5) - 呢個Slider, 藍線完節奏我覺得真係好奇怪, 如果你白線完會相當好, 唔會影響流暢性. 提提你, 你改左白線完再加finish會更有力
11. 好圖, nice job.

• The Tags are different in each diff

• I think you should use the same distance snap throughout the whole map.Probably 1.50x? (You use 1.00x and 1.50x so this might confuse beginners)
  03:00:314 - Unnecessary green line
  00:00:545 (1,1,1,1,2) - Use 1.50x spacing?
  00:21:314 (4) - Too close to previous note
  01:57:775 (1,2,3) - Use 1.50x?
  02:10:698 (3) - ^
  03:00:545 (2) - Too close to previous note
  03:01:468 (1) - ^
  03:04:698 (3) - ^
  03:10:698 (1,2,1,2,3,1) - Inconsistent spacing

• 00:44:391 - Add note?
  00:52:006 (1) - Starting this on the white tick sounds better imo
  01:30:545 - Add note?
  01:52:237 (3) - Maybe curve this slider?
  
  Example

  
  03:08:852 (4) - End this slider on 03:09:775 - and add notes after this? THis slider is too long
  03:12:545 (1,2,3) - Maybe something like this?
  
  

• No problem

• 00:14:852 (8) - NC to emphasize the velocity change? (You do it at 00:22:237 (1) - )2.0x is so fasssst
  00:47:852 (7) - NC?
  00:55:237 (5) - ^
  01:50:391 (5) - Normal slider speed fits better imo
  01:52:237 (5) - ^
  02:03:775 (7) - NC?

[Events]
//Background and Video events
//Storyboard Layer 0 (Background)
Sprite,Background,Centre,"SB\A-1.png",237,73
 L,7929,1
  V,0,0,116,1,0.1,1,1
  V,0,3231,3346,1,1,1,0.1

...(中间略)

Sprite,Background,Centre,"SB\K-8B.png",237,73
 L,190698,1
  V,0,0,116,1,0.1,1,1
  V,0,3231,3346,1,1,1,0.1
//Storyboard Layer 1 (Fail)
//Storyboard Layer 2 (Pass)
//Storyboard Layer 3 (Foreground)
//Storyboard Sound Samples

[Events]
//Background and Video events
0,0,"BG2.jpg"
//Break Periods
2,55929,69833
2,131821,145179
2,164852,171487
//Storyboard Layer 0 (Background)
//Storyboard Layer 1 (Fail)
//Storyboard Layer 2 (Pass)
//Storyboard Layer 3 (Foreground)
//Storyboard Sound Samples
//Background Colour Transformations
3,100,163,162,255

Sprite,Background,Centre,"SB\A-1.png",237,73
 L,7929,1
  V,0,0,116,1,0.1,1,1
  V,0,3231,3346,1,1,1,0.1

...(中间略)

Sprite,Background,Centre,"SB\K-8B.png",237,73
 L,190698,1
  V,0,0,116,1,0.1,1,1
  V,0,3231,3346,1,1,1,0.1

//Storyboard Layer 0 (Background)

1. 第三段kiai的起始点不统一？
   
   Easy: 02:52:237
   Normal: 02:44:852
   kpy: 02:52:237
   Sharon's: 02:59:621
   Taiko: 02:44:852

wmfchris wrote:

的確, kpy's Hard太難了
我叫他改一改好了

kanpakyin wrote:

尼馬無節操阿....我原本就是做I的...........放學再看看吧

wcx19911123 wrote:

[Kanpakyin's Hard]
02:56:621 - 02:58:698 - 这点跳略鬼畜。。

1. 02:11:160 (4) - This 1/4 repeat slider doesn't appear to map to any beat. Making it one long slider would be more fitting.
2. 02:11:737 - This section should be a break like the other difficulties.
3. 03:12:545 (1,2,3) - This being on 1/3 is EXTREMELY misleading. It looks like it's going to be 1/2 but it's not. You would be better off just replacing the diff's ending with a spinner.

1. AR +1. This diff is tough, and AR 8 fits it more.
2. 00:11:045 (1) - Remove circle.
3. 00:14:852 - This should be able to be heard somewhat. It's too quiet at 5%.
4. 00:22:237 - Too quiet.
5. 00:47:852 (7,8) - Instead of doing this, remove the 8 and end the 7 where the 8 used to be.
6. 01:10:583 (1) - Remove circle.
7. 02:03:545 (7) - Remove a repeat so players don't slider break too much here.
8. 02:44:852 - Map this break. It comes so soon after the previous that it's frustrating.
   
   Not sure about this diff, the spacing is all over the place. It also seems harder than Sharon's diff.

1. 00:40:698 (1,2,3) - Wasn't expecting these so soon after the spinner, and couldn't see them well either. Move them away from the center or do something different here.
2. 00:58:698 (6) - This could look a little better. Make it more curved
3. 01:23:621 - Right here is where the massive copy paste becomes obvious. More people will enjoy the map if you make each section particularly different instead of copying and pasting the previous ones. Please consider remapping any large copy pasted sections.
4. 01:56:391 (1,2,3) - You don't need to change this, but it's something to note. Because of the previous times where there are stacks after spinners, this one is extremely readable even when it's in the center. So you don't need to change it. The first time this happens is what really matters.
5. 02:43:121 (1) - Shorten this and do the stack thing that you did before at 01:56:391
6. 02:45:083 - Map this break. It comes so soon after the previous that it's frustrating.
7. 02:57:775 (3,4,5) - This isn't immediately readable. It's not immediately clear that these sliders are going to be 1/3. Having two single repeat sliders instead will make it very readable.
8. 03:12:545 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - This 1/3 is barely readable. Use two single repeat sliders (1 2 3 and 4 5 6) to make the beat easier to read.

Charles445 wrote:

Agree with Sync about the stacks in the Easy and the repeats in the Normal. Fixed a few stacking in easy; removed the hardest multiple-reversing-tick sliders and keeping some sliders with 5 ticks that is easier to read.

Normal

1. 02:11:160 (4) - This 1/4 repeat slider doesn't appear to map to any beat. Making it one long slider would be more fitting.well yes
2. 02:11:737 - This section should be a break like the other difficulties. ^
3. 03:12:545 (1,2,3) - This being on 1/3 is EXTREMELY misleading. It looks like it's going to be 1/2 but it's not. You would be better off just replacing the diff's ending with a spinner.spinner would be too short and it does not goes well with the entire pace, used 1/1 notes instead.

Kanpakyin's Hard

1. AR +1. This diff is tough, and AR 8 fits it more. well yes
2. 00:11:045 (1) - Remove circle. the duplet goes well as a pre-phrase pattern but removing it is reasonable too.
3. 00:14:852 - This should be able to be heard somewhat. It's too quiet at 5%. good catch.
4. 00:22:237 - Too quiet. ^
5. 00:47:852 (7,8) - Instead of doing this, remove the 8 and end the 7 where the 8 used to be. reduced 1 tick for (7) corresponding to 02:03.
6. 01:10:583 (1) - Remove circle. No for this one, it has melodic reference in the music clearly.
7. 02:03:545 (7) - Remove a repeat so players don't slider break too much here. yes. The same logic has been applied to 0:47
8. 02:44:852 - Map this break. It comes so soon after the previous that it's frustrating. I fixed insane before I fix hard so refer to the explaination in hard.
   
   Not sure about this diff, the spacing is all over the place. It also seems harder than Sharon's diff.
   Yes the hard is slightly harder than usual, but several testplays from players suggest that this is easier than [Sharon's].

Sharon's

1. 00:40:698 (1,2,3) - Wasn't expecting these so soon after the spinner, and couldn't see them well either. Move them away from the center or do something different here.=>01:56
2. 00:58:698 (6) - This could look a little better. Make it more curved I don't see how it be looked better or curved more, anyway tweeked the shape slightly.
3. 01:23:621 - Right here is where the massive copy paste becomes obvious. More people will enjoy the map if you make each section particularly different instead of copying and pasting the previous ones. Please consider remapping any large copy pasted sections.Saturio is AFK now and I intend to minimize changes without asking her. The 1st and 3rd sentences sound similar and I changed the 2nd one.
4. 01:56:391 (1,2,3) - You don't need to change this, but it's something to note. Because of the previous times where there are stacks after spinners, this one is extremely readable even when it's in the center. So you don't need to change it. The first time this happens is what really matters.According to your logic if I moved the 0:40 ones this one will be the "first" time happening so it should be removed. Reversely I decided not to change both.
5. 02:43:121 (1) - Shorten this and do the stack thing that you did before at 01:56:391 the music is slightly different and the wind-like sound in the music indicates a holding until 02:44:852 - so I'll keep this one.
6. 02:45:083 - Map this break. It comes so soon after the previous that it's frustrating. As explained above, a vocal-solo section comes after the holding effect, and therefore mappers decided not to map that part and highlight the vocal solo.
7. 02:57:775 (3,4,5) - This isn't immediately readable. It's not immediately clear that these sliders are going to be 1/3. Having two single repeat sliders instead will make it very readable. Agreed here.
8. 03:12:545 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - This 1/3 is barely readable. Use two single repeat sliders (1 2 3 and 4 5 6) to make the beat easier to read.Agree. Instead I changed the spacing of (8,9,1) so (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) is clearly 1/3.

Charles445 wrote:

lazy formatting go

[Sharon's]

"According to your logic if I moved the 0:40 ones this one will be the "first" time happening so it should be removed. Reversely I decided not to change both."

Think about it like this. The player plays the spinner and sees the objects easily if it's below the center. This will inform them of how the beat is. Now that they know how the beat is, when the spinner comes later they'll expect a stack somewhere and will be actively looking for it. They'll see it in the center (since they are now paying attention) and will play it easily. That's why as long as you show the beat clearly before, they can play it later.Yes, seems that I misunderstood your "readable", and now I moved both away.


"Agree. Instead I changed the spacing of (8,9,1) so (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) is clearly 1/3."

I don't think this worked. The spacing of 03:12:545 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - looks extremely similar to the stream right before at 03:10:698 (3,4,5). You would be better off with that part being sliders (or if you INSIST on having it circles, make it even more spaced out.)originally it's mapped even further but somehow it's changed...now I spaced it further again.