1. Himei (7.2 stars, 2592 notes)
2. lolcubes' Hell Oni (6.38 stars, 3517 notes)

Asahina Momoko wrote:

hi!!

Himei

1. 01:11:166 - just a suggestion, how about put a circle here? 01:13:507 - as well Don't like the feeling of this
2. 01:33:410 (1,2) - make their distance a bit larger works well i think, because players probably tap the number of 1 and if so, 01:33:556 (2) - can be close from 01:33:410 (1) - Increased spacing slightly
3. 01:36:556 (7) - put nc here is better for 01:36:629 (8) -, the highspeeded slider? Done
4. 01:45:995 (7) - ^ Done
5. 03:21:702 (5) - nc for 1/3 Done
6. 03:46:142 (4,1) - stack them is not good choice for here imo, because stop cursor here plays worse to follow 03:46:434 (2,3,4) - so instead of it how about put 03:46:142 (4) - on 03:45:995 (3) - ? Fixed in another way, stacked pattern later in the combo and it feels a lot better now, thanks
7. 04:33:556 (7) - change the shape like this looks fine "in editor" xddd o done
   
   means not affect playing

   
8. 06:47:566 (4,7) - put nc here clarify the 1/3 rhythm for playing i think NC is even more confusing imo since rhythm and distance is consistent

it was really impressed me, so solid map o.o
couldn't find to say much, good luck!!!　☆

deetz wrote:

quick look, sorry if i misunderstood anything

03:29:605 (2,3) - this rhythm felt a bit weird, as the only dominant instrument in that spot is the drum, but you chose to keep the emphasized drum beats to the tails even though you just extended a slider into one of those emphasized beats

It might seem a bit odd switching from guitar into drum mapping but I think what I have works and plays quite fine, I know having sladerends land on dominant beats is pretty bad but in this case it works alright imo

03:30:776 (2) - seems a bit odd to me to put the guitar hit on a slidertail then start mapping the guitar again

The whole combo inbetween upcoming and previous guitar sounds is pretty much improvised rhythm as I didn't want to stick to drum mapping, once again I think it sounds and plays just fine

03:46:580 (3,4) - sound isn't the same between these two as it was at 03:45:702 (1,2) - , maybe have some movement here

True, I've reworked this pattern once already and thought it would work better playability-wise but changed it once more now, should play and follow music better.

03:53:898 (1) - could increase stream spacing here for more movement as pitch increases :p

Remapped the stream and applied this

03:55:361 (3) - i don't like how this stops the movement but that's just me lol

Hm, I didn't consider this.. will keep it in mind

04:30:922 (5,6) - eh feels a bit random to increase the spacing just for this one

True but I think the pattern plays fine enough even with the distance change inbetween

05:29:898 (1) - would fit more to start the spacing increase here rather than 05:30:483 (1) - imo

Done

07:44:713 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4) - i am very unsure about how readable the 1/4 is compared to the 1/3

Changed

08:41:639 (1) - sliders being a bit too short to come out triggers me a bit tbh :B

I think it's fine, getting the sliderend out further by increasing sv looks like a dumb 9

08:47:493 (4) - consider making it a slider cuz the sound is held

not sure where to end the slider so i kept it like this

really good map :d

l1mi wrote:

01:36:044 (4) - Closer to the note before maybe, you said you would think about it. its visually closer now
04:05:898 (4,1) - Replace it with a slider, easier to hit when you leave the reversed slider. I actually like it the way it is right now, the 1/2 break after the 1/6 slider+circle lets you snap onto the next triplet pretty nicely imo edit : changed it as I changed the 1/6s to 1/4s
06:46:908 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - No indication its not going to be 1/2 again, only way to read this is to look at the approach circles or remember it; dont like it just saying. Visually nearly impossible to show a 3/4 rhythm with circles, this is the best I could get down. People should be fine with not breaking combo there as long as they wont misread it badly as 1/2 jumps. Then again most jumps on this map are longer distance than this so keeping this in mind players should pay more attention to approach circles here.

04:52:434 (1,2,3,4,5) - Something sound offbeat (it was 1/3).

My mistake, fixed

05:22:288 (3) - Dont think this follow the vocal, but it would be good if someone else could check this out as well because im not sure. But for me it sounds as if he sing on only white and red tics. Seems fine to me on bluetick
05:24:629 (3) - The next similar slider seem ok.


Dont know how to use hitsounds but what do you think about adding some here?

06:09:444 (1) - clap has drum clap for finish sound
06:14:127 (1) - clap Has drum whistle as a clap sound
06:18:810 (1) - clap ^
06:23:493 (1) - clap ^
01:25:215 (2) - clap ^

1. What's wrong withy all the red lines before the map even start?
2. 00:39:849 (5) - Add NC as your SV starts to slowly increase from here
3. 00:47:459 (4) - You forgot NC
4. 01:25:215 (2) - Maybe it would be wiser to put the NC here instead of 01:24:922 (1) - to prevent the new SV
5. 01:36:629 (2) - ^ instead of 01:36:556 (1) - it's the slider you want to put attention!
6. 02:06:995 - You miss a pretty strong beat here. I guess it's not that important though but well
7. 03:21:117 (1) - Try to reduce it a bit, it touches the hp bar!
8. 03:21:702 (1,2,1) - I find the rythme a bit unexpeted tbh and the slider doesn't feel catchy at all, not sure how to fix it, but I think it would sound better if you add a reverse on 03:21:702 (1) - to stay constant and not forget the beats
9. 03:37:873 - Would sound really cool if you add a note here as it will call back this triple 03:38:385 (6) -
10. 03:39:556 (2) - NC here?
11. 06:30:219 (3) - The end of the slider is pretty big, reduce the slider to finish on the previous blue tick and add a note at 06:30:511 - ?
12. 03:57:410 - I'dd add a note here and put the spinner on the next blue tick. I usually don't agree with this rhythme but your pattern feels a bit unfinished here (probably cause we can't here that downbeat)
13. 04:06:483 (7) - NC for new SV
14. 06:21:292 (2) - I'd remove to give more impact to 06:20:853 (4,5,6,1) -
15. 06:23:633 (2) - ^
16. 06:51:511 - The way you did is more natural but a note sounds great here though xD
17. 07:43:755 - ah you miss a pretty strong beat once more
18. 08:05:633 - why not mapping it? It's pretty strong and feels pretty natural to map it as far as I'm concerned :c
19. 08:06:511 (1) - I don't know what you think about it, but for this section I'll maybe try to add a few more triples as it feels a bit empty compared to the music that is full of 1/4. I feel the patterns (rhythmically) are more appropriate from 08:10:024 (1) -
20. 08:39:877 (1) - Might be just me but I feel that I'd still prefer a semicircle for more flow!
21. 07:08:999 (5) - Wouldn't it be more logical to put the NC here instead of here 07:09:365 (1) - ?
22. 06:55:536 (1) - NC? to prevent the new SV.