1. Hard (3,64 stars, 262 notes)
2. Insane (5,06 stars, 398 notes)
3. Normal (2,35 stars, 191 notes)
4. Yales' Easy (1,83 stars, 128 notes)

Amamiya Yuko wrote:

I WANT TO SHOOT MORE ON CHEWIN'S FACE, BUT I DON'T HAVE ENOUGH

Amamiya Yuko wrote:

taking first mod becuz i can

[General]

1. check aimod baka <3 there're some unsnapped notes in insane
2. change the artist unicode to ナノ, you forgot again baka <3
3. add WEST GROUND, Masato Kouda into tags, they're the composer and the arranger of the song

[Easy]

1. 00:00:685 - the volume of the beginning is so high.. change to 40% so it'd be consistent with the insane
2. and add some whistles at the beginning like what chewin did?
3. 00:06:310 (2) - by your style of clap adding, you should add a clap on this too
4. 00:09:435 (1) - remove NC, or add on 00:11:935 (3) -
5. 01:00:841 (1) - whistle on the whole slider?
6. 01:18:185 (1,2) - well this is weird, since you use this rhythm on the 3rd measure of the first kiai (01:05:685 (1,2) - this), but use it on the 4th one here. i think you'd better make them consistent, either change the first one or this one.

best map of yours so far, chewin, seriously.

1. Tags are inconsistent throughout the difficulties, see this puush!
   
   Click me!

   
2. Unsnapped green lines throughout the difficulties as well.
   
   Click!

   In Normal, Hard, Insane 00:15:785 - and 00:40:785 -

1. 00:08:966 (1) - Are you sure with this NC? Somehow it seems rather useless to me, might be just me though...
2. 00:12:560 (1,2,3,4) - I think this pattern could play a bit better, if you'd re-arrange it like this http://puu.sh/abwEM/9be1bc9caa.jpg I think this is the reason because 00:12:403 (2,1) - You already have a jump here so I feel it's natural to have a jump on the next note too and then make the spacing go lower, consider about it!
3. 00:13:653 (3) - I think it's kind of awkward to go that low from 2>3, so you could try x:288 y:260 for 3, I think having almost the same spacing but a different angle would help the playability. It'd also form a cute triangle with 00:12:403 (2,1) - !
   
   Example

   
4. 00:19:669 (2,3,1,2,1,2) - Really fun pattern, you nailed it <3
5. 00:25:372 (3) - I honestly think some of these sliders that end on a stanza are quite inconsistent because you mostly use 3/4 stuff, therefore you could shorten this by 1/4 and adding a note at the stanza, the rhythm would improve at the same time.
6. 00:29:122 (1) - Move this to x:92 y:200 if you want to keep the straight line between 00:28:810 (5,1) - (it'd make sense to do so because your straight line was correct on the next one so )
7. 00:35:372 (4) - Like I said earlier, sliders that end on a stanza feel wrong to play and rhythm-wise they're not too great. If you'd turn this into a slider + note combination like at 00:37:872 (4,1) - , it'd play better for sure and feel consistent.
8. 01:12:716 (1,2,3) - I think the low spacing destroys the flow here, what about this pattern?
   
   Example

   
9. 01:13:028 (3,4,1) - Just a quick question, shouldn't your new combo be on the 01:13:028 (3) - instead according to your NC pattern?
10. 01:15:528 (4,5,1) - Same as above btw
11. 01:18:028 (4,5,1) - ^
    01:19:278 (5,6,1) - ^ And soooo on
12. Really fun Insane, great job owo

1. I honestly think Ar 7 in a 192 bpm song is a wrong choice, it feels WAY too slow. Consider using 7,5 or 8, I highly prefer 8 though. Some parts like 01:04:747 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5) - feel extremely slow due to the low Ar and thats why it's kind of annoying and hard to play.
2. If you decide to raise the ar up by one, raise the od and hp by one too.
3. 00:03:966 (6,7) - I honestly prefer the movement what CTRL + G would do here, now the movement is kinda crappy to play (at least for me)
4. 00:11:310 (3,4) - Maybe you could make the blanket perfect? Just for me? I honestly think it'd fit better too that way!
5. 00:14:591 (4) - Because there is the small gap between this and the previous object, it'd make more sense (imo) to put on the RIGHT side of 00:14:747 (5) - , it really improves flow, I highly suggest placing 00:14:591 (4) - at x:300 y:280
6. 00:49:747 (1) - If you'd rotate this slider a bit, the transition between 00:49:591 (4,1) - would get improved which would result in a better gameplay, try it!
   
   Example

   
7. 01:13:028 (3,4,1) - If you agreed on the NC change in the Insane, change them here too owo

1. +1 On all settings for better diff spread (if you agreed on the setting change in Hard)
2. 00:15:685 (5) - I really, really suggest adding the spinner here, otherwise you'd have none and then it could be somewhat annoying to play because you want to get good ranks but can't because there's no spinner >:
3. 01:19:903 (5,6) - DS Error
4. There's nothing that really got my intention, mostly the patterns seemed to be cluttered due to the low AR but honestly the structure of the difficulty was great.

1. Why does the Easy have the same AR as the normal difficulty? Doesn't make any sense. -1 Ar please
2. 00:08:185 (4) - If you listen closely with 25% playback, the strong beat is on the white tick so your extension of this slider doesn't make that much sense, it'd be a lot better if you would shorten it up by 1/2, making it better to play! A good solid rhythm choice would be:
   
   Suggestion

   
3. 00:15:685 (1) - See my spinner suggestion made in Normal, same applies here.
4. 00:46:310 (2,3) - Same stuff, the sliders ending in the red ticks are bad because the strong beat is on the white ticks, try to re-arrange the rhythm to something similar so it'd be consistent. (If you want any suggestions for this part, catch me in-game)
5. 00:59:278 (2) - The sudden 1/2 usage is really, really random because there aren't any beats that would support the red tick more than the white tick, the vocals support the white tick so try to use the consistent 1/1 rhythm
   
   See this

   
6. 01:08:185 (1) - I honestly think the rhythm is off in this part, mainly because the song has weird stuff on it. The best rhythm example I could come up with is this; I think it'd improve the gameplay and make things easier for newbies.
   
   Suggestion

   
7. 01:24:278 (2,3) - DS error

1. 00:02:560 (3,4) - I think note stacks can be confusing for beginners. but this is personal preference I guess? if you agree, you could shift the first few notes so that these 2 notes have a circular flow. I can understand if you don't want to do this, as it is a decent amount of work, but it'll make the map more enjoyable for new players :
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:15:685 (5) - I suggest you place a spinner here that ends at 00:18:185
3. 00:20:685 (3,4) - blanket can be improved. ctrl+g the 3 and use its approach circle.
4. 01:12:091 (4,1) - ^
5. 00:50:997 - add note here. very strong beat in the music and vocals, feels wrong ignoring it.
6. 00:30:060 (4,5) - same as 00:02:560 (3,4) - , but re arranging things here is more tricky, again, this is up to you. here is a suggestion
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 01:00:841 (1) - i am not sure about this for an easy. the slider is too small for a beginner to be able to read the reverses after the first one. maybe you can try to simplify this rhythm like this, or simply don't map it like in Normal :
   
   SPOILER

   
8. 01:25:060 (3) - distance snap error here.

1. 00:15:685 (5) - Same as easy's spinner suggestion.
2. 01:19:903 (5) - check distance snap here.
3. 00:44:122 (3,4,5) - maybe try this for circular flow? this straight line pattern feels stiff when playing. you'll need to adjust the following notes if you do this
   
   SPOILER

   
   Nothing else here. everything else looks good.

1. 00:19:747 (1,1,1) - isn't this a bit much for a Hard? this is the hardest part of the map in my opinion. the high SV ,high BPM and low AR of the song makes this very uncomfortable to play.
2. 00:11:310 (3,4) - Maybe make this into perfect blanket?
3. 00:38:185 (1,2) - blanket here can be improved as well
4. 00:13:185 (1,3) - same as above. ctrl+g the 1 and use the approach circle to make it perfect
5. 00:48:653 (3) - maybe try something like this here, feels better going to 00:49:591 (4) -
   
   SPOILER

   
6. 01:27:716 (4) - I think you should make a normal 1/2 slider, and place a circle at 01:28:028 - this is a very strong beat at end with a finish, having it at a tail of a reverse slider takes away from the awesomeness dont you think?

1. 00:15:841 - add spinner? break doesnt seem fitting when theres a prominent vocal going on. could have it end at 00:18:185 - or 00:18:810 -
2. 00:32:560 (3) - blanket the tail of this better? by moving the 3rd node to 249,209
3. 00:59:278 (2) - wat. i think you meant to put this on 00:59:122 - ? to avoid 1/2 spacing between notes. also dont hear anything that really stands out at 00:59:278 -
4. 01:19:278 (2,3) - have the slider perfectly go through the tail of slider 2 ._." i prefer not to see tiny bits sticking out lol . move whole thing to 360,153 and move 2nd node to 375,332
5. 01:24:278 (2,3) - reduce distance? to 1.0x

1. circle size to 3.2? it feels really cramped at some parts like at 00:49:591 -
2. the way this is set up is weird o-o having the 1/2s start on red ticks. can throw some people off when theres 1/2 sliders of the same pattern later on at 00:52:560 (4,5) - that start on white ticks. so maybe try this rhythm? remvoe 00:49:747 (5) - and replace with a hitcircle at 00:49:747 - . move 00:50:216 (1,2) - to start at 00:50:060 - and add a hitcircle at 00:50:685 -
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 01:02:560 - remove green tick here? and change the SV of the green tick here 01:01:935 - to x1.00 o-o it kinda messes up the spacing. should also fix the spacing between 01:01:935 (1,2,1) -
4. 01:20:685 (1) - if youre going to ahve an intentional pause here, i suggest changing this into a hitcircle at 01:20:685 - . because 01:20:997 - and 01:21:310 - are the starts of the new vocal section, the one that lasts from 01:20:997 - to 01:22:716 -. so if feels really weird if you start the new vocal section with the slider reverse and and tail and then suddenly stop.. :/

1. 00:21:153 (1,2,3) - this triplet's spacing is a bit too difficult for a hard diff. lower it to .6?
2. 00:21:622 (4,5) - i prefer not to use this kind of flow unless theres a drastic change and emphasis in the vocal at slider 5. the vocals sound pretty .. flowy and connected to me since 00:21:310 (3,5) - both have vocal pitch so i think it would be better to have 00:21:622 (4) - directly flow into 00:21:778 (5) - with this placement
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:30:060 (1) - this really matches the music but first play through it tricked me ;-; thought there was only 1 reverse. while its nice, it kinda kills people on first plays. replace with 4 hitcircles?
4. 00:38:185 (1,2) - blanket better o3o mvoe 3rd node of slider 2 to 255,294. if change is made, will have to move 00:38:966 (3) - lol. for that, mvoe 3rd node to 189,329
5. 00:46:778 (5) - mvoe whole thing to 216,147 for better blanket ._."
6. 01:02:247 - same as the one in insane. add a green tick here to silence the tail with 5% audio as theres nothing in the music here?
7. 01:06:622 (5) - turn this into 2 hitcircles? the vocal at 01:06:778 - is very strong and theres another lesser vocal heard at 01:06:622 - . it doesnt feel right having the stronger vocal at the tail of the slider while the weaker one is at the head so.. 2 hitcircles? ~
8. 01:20:685 (3) - remove and have a hitcircle at the head? i cant hear anything significant about the tail of this slider and i think it would be better to differentiate it from 01:20:372 (2) - since theyre definitely not the smae in the music

1. 00:08:966 (1) - remove NC? seems unnecessary as theres really no change in the music also for consistency with 00:13:185 (1,2) - where you didnt NC
2. 00:25:372 (3,4) - it feels a bit off to have the stongest vocal at the tail of a 1/1 slider when theres no jumps before it. the whole thing feels much slower. maybe try this rhythm to hit the vocal at 00:25:685 - with the head of the 1/1 slider and a jump after 00:25:216 (2) - . maybe an antijump in there too?
   
   SPOILER

   
   possible setup

   
3. 00:32:247 (1,2,3) - i feel like the distance between 00:32:403 (2,3) - should be larger than the distance between 00:32:247 (1,2) - since 1 and 2 are similar in the vocals while 3 is more emphasized
4. 00:35:372 (4) - shorten this to end at 00:35:606 - and add a hitcircle at 00:35:685 - ? for both consistency and emphasize for the "twoooo" part, much like what you did at 00:37:872 (4,1) -
5. 00:55:060 (1) - i think this would flow better if the head of this was stacked with the head of 00:54:278 (4) - . i cant really explain this ._." it just does for me LOL horrible reasoning ;-;
6. 00:59:278 (3) - unstack this to put a bit of emphasis on the vocal here? it seems like your pattern is following vocals starting here 00:58:185 (1,4,5) - for the starts of these stacks. seems consistent to continue with this through til 00:59:278 (3) - . i think it could also better prepare for the stream that comes next by placing it higher so theres a fluid transition from 00:59:278 (3) - to 00:59:435 (1) -
   SPOILER

   
7. 01:02:247 - add a green tick here to silence the tail with 5% audio as theres nothing in the music here? i wasnt sure if this was allowed until i checked up on https://osu.ppy.sh/b/413597 at 00:34:117 - so i think its rankable o-o
8. 01:27:872 (1,2) - ctrl g for better flow?

Asphyxia wrote:

Hi Chewin!

[General]

1. Tags are inconsistent throughout the difficulties, see this puush! baka yales, fixed
   
   Click me!

   
2. Unsnapped green lines throughout the difficulties as well. fixed :3
   
   Click!

   In Normal, Hard, Insane 00:15:785 - and 00:40:785 -

[Insane]

1. 00:08:966 (1) - Are you sure with this NC? Somehow it seems rather useless to me, might be just me though... Im sure yea, it follows the same logic of 00:06:153 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2) -
2. 00:12:560 (1,2,3,4) - I think this pattern could play a bit better, if you'd re-arrange it like this http://puu.sh/abwEM/9be1bc9caa.jpg I think this is the reason because 00:12:403 (2,1) - You already have a jump here so I feel it's natural to have a jump on the next note too and then make the spacing go lower, consider about it! I already replied you on skype about this, this pattern spacing is consistent with 00:07:560 (1,2,3,4)'s one
3. 00:13:653 (3) - I think it's kind of awkward to go that low from 2>3, so you could try x:288 y:260 for 3, I think having almost the same spacing but a different angle would help the playability. It'd also form a cute triangle with 00:12:403 (2,1) - ! I really don't like it.. bad flow rly
   
   Example

   
4. 00:19:669 (2,3,1,2,1,2) - Really fun pattern, you nailed it <3 *-*
5. 00:25:372 (3) - I honestly think some of these sliders that end on a stanza are quite inconsistent because you mostly use 3/4 stuff, therefore you could shorten this by 1/4 and adding a note at the stanza, the rhythm would improve at the same time. cool fixed! <3
6. 00:29:122 (1) - Move this to x:92 y:200 if you want to keep the straight line between 00:28:810 (5,1) - (it'd make sense to do so because your straight line was correct on the next one so ) Im so bad at mapping, fixed!
7. 00:35:372 (4) - Like I said earlier, sliders that end on a stanza feel wrong to play and rhythm-wise they're not too great. If you'd turn this into a slider + note combination like at 00:37:872 (4,1) - , it'd play better for sure and feel consistent. yea yea
8. 01:12:716 (1,2,3) - I think the low spacing destroys the flow here, what about this pattern? fixed in an other way
   
   Example

   
9. 01:13:028 (3,4,1) - Just a quick question, shouldn't your new combo be on the 01:13:028 (3) - instead according to your NC pattern?
10. 01:15:528 (4,5,1) - Same as above btw
11. 01:18:028 (4,5,1) - ^
    01:19:278 (5,6,1) - ^ And soooo on all no, because if I added NC there they wouldn't be consistent with other (1,2) (slider-circle) NC patterns
12. Really fun Insane, great job owo

[Hard]

1. I honestly think Ar 7 in a 192 bpm song is a wrong choice, it feels WAY too slow. Consider using 7,5 or 8, I highly prefer 8 though. Some parts like 01:04:747 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5) - feel extremely slow due to the low Ar and thats why it's kind of annoying and hard to play. ok <3 look pretty cool
2. If you decide to raise the ar up by one, raise the od and hp by one too. no at this, I prefer keeping this lower
3. 00:03:966 (6,7) - I honestly prefer the movement what CTRL + G would do here, now the movement is kinda crappy to play (at least for me) Nope. The cursor movement is circular together with 00:03:810 (5,6,7) - making a square
4. 00:11:310 (3,4) - Maybe you could make the blanket perfect? Just for me? I honestly think it'd fit better too that way! fixed i guess
5. 00:14:591 (4) - Because there is the small gap between this and the previous object, it'd make more sense (imo) to put on the RIGHT side of 00:14:747 (5) - , it really improves flow, I highly suggest placing 00:14:591 (4) - at x:300 y:280 Not really.. the whole map has been mapped with distance snap at x1.20 and I want to keep it consistent :c
6. 00:49:747 (1) - If you'd rotate this slider a bit, the transition between 00:49:591 (4,1) - would get improved which would result in a better gameplay, try it! Don't hate me but.. I don't like it welp. If you notice in my mapping style I always keep mapping circle/slider in a way that the first element is placed some grids up than the second, or some grid left or right from the second, it depends where it is placed. Pretty hard to explain what I want to mean welp I hope you got it. Actually this plays much better if you consider the flow. :3
   
   Example

   
7. 01:13:028 (3,4,1) - If you agreed on the NC change in the Insane, change them here too owo :C

[Normal]

1. +1 On all settings for better diff spread (if you agreed on the setting change in Hard) I agree with increasing the ar by 1!
2. 00:15:685 (5) - I really, really suggest adding the spinner here, otherwise you'd have none and then it could be somewhat annoying to play because you want to get good ranks but can't because there's no spinner >: no pls the star rating is already mad at me. If I removed this break time the star rating would go on over9000 stars. I wanted to keep this hole in the lower diff.
3. 01:19:903 (5,6) - DS Error welp fixed
4. There's nothing that really got my intention, mostly the patterns seemed to be cluttered due to the low AR but honestly the structure of the difficulty was great.

Solid mapset :3 I really, really liked the Insane. It played super well and it was well polished. Hard was pretty good too, although some improvements could be made, Normal was cool and Easy was nicely polished too although some of the rhythms were kind of questionable. I think I'm gonna come back sometime soon here~

Setz206 wrote:

Hi Chewin.

I am going to try M4M my first time, I am fairly new to the modding thing so hopefully i can actually be useful

[Normal]

1. 00:15:685 (5) - Same as easy's spinner suggestion. same reply above, read asphyxia mod reply :3
2. 01:19:903 (5) - check distance snap here. yea fixed
3. 00:44:122 (3,4,5) - maybe try this for circular flow? this straight line pattern feels stiff when playing. you'll need to adjust the following notes if you do this Actually the pattern you suggested makes the spacing between 00:44:747 (5,1) - inconsistent. Tho, this pattern has been made straight on purpose :3 want to keep it!
   
   SPOILER

   
   Nothing else here. everything else looks good.

[Hard]

1. 00:19:747 (1,1,1) - isn't this a bit much for a Hard? this is the hardest part of the map in my opinion. the high SV ,high BPM and low AR of the song makes this very uncomfortable to play. yes you are right but now I changed the AR increasing it by 1. It should be much better now to play and read!
2. 00:11:310 (3,4) - Maybe make this into perfect blanket? wow you and asphyxia are so stronk guys. Fixed already!
3. 00:38:185 (1,2) - blanket here can be improved as well done
4. 00:13:185 (1,3) - same as above. ctrl+g the 1 and use the approach circle to make it perfect cool
5. 00:48:653 (3) - maybe try something like this here, feels better going to 00:49:591 (4) - wow didn't notice that the flow from (3) to (4) was so bad. I fixed it in an other way, thanks! good catch
   
   SPOILER

   
6. 01:27:716 (4) - I think you should make a normal 1/2 slider, and place a circle at 01:28:028 - this is a very strong beat at end with a finish, having it at a tail of a reverse slider takes away from the awesomeness dont you think? uhuh nice, fixed

That's all i have. I am no good at modding insane, but hopefully you will find this useful in some way.

Kihhou wrote:

aaaaaaaaaaa m4m? o3o hope im not doing this wrong and the slots arent already taken ;-; sadly we have already talked via PM.. you are a bit late but I will probably take this request as well çWç

[Harvard's Easy]

WHAT WHO IS HARVARD!!!!

[Normal]

1. circle size to 3.2? it feels really cramped at some parts like at 00:49:591 - mh why? I think it's actually fine
2. the way this is set up is weird o-o having the 1/2s start on red ticks. can throw some people off when theres 1/2 sliders of the same pattern later on at 00:52:560 (4,5) - that start on white ticks. so maybe try this rhythm? remvoe 00:49:747 (5) - and replace with a hitcircle at 00:49:747 - . move 00:50:216 (1,2) - to start at 00:50:060 - and add a hitcircle at 00:50:685 - that is actually a very good catch, I fixed thanks!
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 01:02:560 - remove green tick here? and change the SV of the green tick here 01:01:935 - to x1.00 o-o it kinda messes up the spacing. should also fix the spacing between 01:01:935 (1,2,1) - wowowo fixed <3
4. 01:20:685 (1) - if youre going to ahve an intentional pause here, i suggest changing this into a hitcircle at 01:20:685 - . because 01:20:997 - and 01:21:310 - are the starts of the new vocal section, the one that lasts from 01:20:997 - to 01:22:716 -. so if feels really weird if you start the new vocal section with the slider reverse and and tail and then suddenly stop.. :/ nah I think this is fine

[Hardddddd]

1. 00:21:153 (1,2,3) - this triplet's spacing is a bit too difficult for a hard diff. lower it to .6? this is cool now to read with ar 8, I incresed it to have a better read
2. 00:21:622 (4,5) - i prefer not to use this kind of flow unless theres a drastic change and emphasis in the vocal at slider 5. the vocals sound pretty .. flowy and connected to me since 00:21:310 (3,5) - both have vocal pitch so i think it would be better to have 00:21:622 (4) - directly flow into 00:21:778 (5) - with this placement okay!
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:30:060 (1) - this really matches the music but first play through it tricked me ;-; thought there was only 1 reverse. while its nice, it kinda kills people on first plays. replace with 4 hitcircles? aww everyone hates this çwç fixed with some 1/2 sliders!
4. 00:38:185 (1,2) - blanket better o3o mvoe 3rd node of slider 2 to 255,294. if change is made, will have to move 00:38:966 (3) - lol. for that, mvoe 3rd node to 189,329 already fixed from the previous mod
5. 00:46:778 (5) - mvoe whole thing to 216,147 for better blanket ._." done
6. 01:02:247 - same as the one in insane. add a green tick here to silence the tail with 5% audio as theres nothing in the music here? 20%, 5 is unrankable
7. 01:06:622 (5) - turn this into 2 hitcircles? the vocal at 01:06:778 - is very strong and theres another lesser vocal heard at 01:06:622 - . it doesnt feel right having the stronger vocal at the tail of the slider while the weaker one is at the head so.. 2 hitcircles? ~ I want to keep this slider sry
8. 01:20:685 (3) - remove and have a hitcircle at the head? i cant hear anything significant about the tail of this slider and i think it would be better to differentiate it from 01:20:372 (2) - since theyre definitely not the smae in the music there is a strong sound on that red tick wat..

[Insane]

1. 00:08:966 (1) - remove NC? seems unnecessary as theres really no change in the music also for consistency with 00:13:185 (1,2) - where you didnt NC read asp's mod reply
2. 00:25:372 (3,4) - it feels a bit off to have the stongest vocal at the tail of a 1/1 slider when theres no jumps before it. the whole thing feels much slower. maybe try this rhythm to hit the vocal at 00:25:685 - with the head of the 1/1 slider and a jump after 00:25:216 (2) - . maybe an antijump in there too? already fixed from asph
   
   SPOILER

   
   possible setup

   
3. 00:32:247 (1,2,3) - i feel like the distance between 00:32:403 (2,3) - should be larger than the distance between 00:32:247 (1,2) - since 1 and 2 are similar in the vocals while 3 is more emphasized i tried but it plays cool too in this way, i didn't have any idea about the spacing jump here
4. 00:35:372 (4) - shorten this to end at 00:35:606 - and add a hitcircle at 00:35:685 - ? for both consistency and emphasize for the "twoooo" part, much like what you did at 00:37:872 (4,1) - ya already fixed
5. 00:55:060 (1) - i think this would flow better if the head of this was stacked with the head of 00:54:278 (4) - . i cant really explain this ._." it just does for me LOL horrible reasoning ;-; wow no so ugly..
6. 00:59:278 (3) - unstack this to put a bit of emphasis on the vocal here? it seems like your pattern is following vocals starting here 00:58:185 (1,4,5) - for the starts of these stacks. seems consistent to continue with this through til 00:59:278 (3) - . i think it could also better prepare for the stream that comes next by placing it higher so theres a fluid transition from 00:59:278 (3) - to 00:59:435 (1) -
   SPOILER

   
   I fixed with an awesome jumping pattern!
7. 01:02:247 - add a green tick here to silence the tail with 5% audio as theres nothing in the music here? i wasnt sure if this was allowed until i checked up on https://osu.ppy.sh/b/413597 at 00:34:117 - so i think its rankable o-o done already when you mentioned it in the hard
8. 01:27:872 (1,2) - ctrl g for better flow?actually my flow is better lol
   

ok

EDIT: oh. GG

Asphyxia wrote:

[Easy]

1. Why does the Easy have the same AR as the normal difficulty? Doesn't make any sense. -1 Ar please My bad
2. 00:08:185 (4) - If you listen closely with 25% playback, the strong beat is on the white tick so your extension of this slider doesn't make that much sense, it'd be a lot better if you would shorten it up by 1/2, making it better to play! A good solid rhythm choice would be: ok
   
   Suggestion

   
3. 00:15:685 (1) - See my spinner suggestion made in Normal, same applies here. Chewin doesn't want to, so I won't put a spinner neither.
4. 00:46:310 (2,3) - Same stuff, the sliders ending in the red ticks are bad because the strong beat is on the white ticks, try to re-arrange the rhythm to something similar so it'd be consistent. (If you want any suggestions for this part, catch me in-game) Mh I guess it's fixed.
5. 00:59:278 (2) - The sudden 1/2 usage is really, really random because there aren't any beats that would support the red tick more than the white tick, the vocals support the white tick so try to use the consistent 1/1 rhythm My bad o.o
   
   See this

   
6. 01:08:185 (1) - I honestly think the rhythm is off in this part, mainly because the song has weird stuff on it. The best rhythm example I could come up with is this; I think it'd improve the gameplay and make things easier for newbies. I'm following the vocal.
   
   Suggestion

   
7. 01:24:278 (2,3) - DS error fixed

Solid mapset :3 I really, really liked the Insane. It played super well and it was well polished. Hard was pretty good too, although some improvements could be made, Normal was cool and Easy was nicely polished too although some of the rhythms were kind of questionable. I think I'm gonna come back sometime soon here~

Setz206 wrote:

[Easy]

1. 00:02:560 (3,4) - I think note stacks can be confusing for beginners. but this is personal preference I guess? if you agree, you could shift the first few notes so that these 2 notes have a circular flow. I can understand if you don't want to do this, as it is a decent amount of work, but it'll make the map more enjoyable for new players : ok fixed.
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:15:685 (5) - I suggest you place a spinner here that ends at 00:18:185 nope cause normal doesnt have it.
3. 00:20:685 (3,4) - blanket can be improved. ctrl+g the 3 and use its approach circle. fixed
4. 01:12:091 (4,1) - ^ fixed, I guess
5. 00:50:997 - add note here. very strong beat in the music and vocals, feels wrong ignoring it. ok
6. 00:30:060 (4,5) - same as 00:02:560 (3,4) - , but re arranging things here is more tricky, again, this is up to you. here is a suggestion I prefer the stack here cause new section inc.
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 01:00:841 (1) - i am not sure about this for an easy. the slider is too small for a beginner to be able to read the reverses after the first one. maybe you can try to simplify this rhythm like this, or simply don't map it like in Normal : mh, k
   
   SPOILER

   
8. 01:25:060 (3) - distance snap error here. fixed

Kihhou wrote:

[Oxford's Easy]

1. 00:15:841 - add spinner? break doesnt seem fitting when theres a prominent vocal going on. could have it end at 00:18:185 - or 00:18:810 - No because there's no spinner in normal
2. 00:32:560 (3) - blanket the tail of this better? by moving the 3rd node to 249,209 ok ~
3. 00:59:278 (2) - wat. i think you meant to put this on 00:59:122 - ? to avoid 1/2 spacing between notes. also dont hear anything that really stands out at 00:59:278 - already fixed, I dont even know why it was this way wtf
4. 01:19:278 (2,3) - have the slider perfectly go through the tail of slider 2 ._." i prefer not to see tiny bits sticking out lol . move whole thing to 360,153 and move 2nd node to 375,332 fixed
5. 01:24:278 (2,3) - reduce distance? to 1.0x yepyep

1. Your title is incorrect, it should be Born to be (you can see that it's lowercase from the video, also from the source here
2. I think the (TV Size) should be included to the title because currently two ranked maps have it too so I don't see the reason why not (unless someone can provide me info that there's no TV Size in the title)
3. ^ If you fixed the above, remove the tags ''tv, size, and cut''. You need to remove the ''cut'' anyway from the tags since it doesn't make any sense, this isn't a cut version. (and tv tag doesn't work since only 2 letters iirc)
4. What happened to your settings in Hard and Normal? I think Hard should have settings at least 8-6-6 and normal 5-4-4.