Yeah, thought I made that clear earlier but apparently I didn't.Rantai wrote:
Then you made that extremely ambiguous. What intent anyway?
Adds nothing, straw-graspy. Does nothing to help town.NoHitter wrote:
This game feels really inactive... (I mean some people haven't even posted after confirmation)
Not sure what to think of the reasoning of Caligno's vote. Seems like it was a bit straw-graspy.
Also Rantai's reaction seems pretty defensive for an early game vote.
Unvote
RVS is over.
Comes after his post asking dake why he was voting for rantai instead of royston without putting his vote where his mouth is.NoHitter wrote:
Alright, let's try this. There are pretty much two main wagons as of now: Rantai's and Royston's.
I don't think Rantai's actions are indicative to scum. I feel his frustration is genuine, though a bit overdone. Null tell for Rantai.
Royston's actions, i.e. voting for Quotes was fine, but there's something about his excuse which bothers me. He said that he voted Quotes as a joke, implying he knew he was confirmed town, but said later that he was "misreading" it into Rantai - saying he thought Rantai was confirmed town. Which makes his earlier justification of voting Quotes a contradiction.
Vote: Royston
And for all of you still RVS voting, please stop already. We're out of RVS.
Irreversible wrote:
I'll try to catch things up, my post will come in a few hours for sure, sorry for inactiity
It's called saying your thoughts. How is giving your opinion not helping town?Quotes wrote:
Adds nothing, straw-graspy. Does nothing to help town.NoHitter wrote:
This game feels really inactive... (I mean some people haven't even posted after confirmation)
Not sure what to think of the reasoning of Caligno's vote. Seems like it was a bit straw-graspy.
Also Rantai's reaction seems pretty defensive for an early game vote.
Unvote
RVS is over.
Dake's explanation seemed genuine to me, so I didn't pursue him further along that line, and I did explain why I voted Royston (albeit I failed at reading at that point)Quotes wrote:
Comes after his post asking dake why he was voting for rantai instead of royston without putting his vote where his mouth is.NoHitter wrote:
Alright, let's try this. There are pretty much two main wagons as of now: Rantai's and Royston's.
I don't think Rantai's actions are indicative to scum. I feel his frustration is genuine, though a bit overdone. Null tell for Rantai.
Royston's actions, i.e. voting for Quotes was fine, but there's something about his excuse which bothers me. He said that he voted Quotes as a joke, implying he knew he was confirmed town, but said later that he was "misreading" it into Rantai - saying he thought Rantai was confirmed town. Which makes his earlier justification of voting Quotes a contradiction.
Vote: Royston
And for all of you still RVS voting, please stop already. We're out of RVS.
Immediately unvotes Royston after a quick explanation on why he voted why he did.
Rantai wrote:
Not much time to read stuff atm, will be back tomorrow after my final tut.
RVS has been over for a while. Don't know why you would state the obvious.OnosakiHito wrote:
Unvote
RVS is already over.
It's not a reaction test this time, I have suspicions of him.Rantai wrote:
@Royston - seems like another Sakura-reaction-test
So your doubting Royston's towniness yet you think there's scum on his wagon?, if you're doubting royston's towniness and he's town it's more likely that scum is standing by watching town mislynch on their own.DakeDekaane wrote:
I bet there's scum in Royston wagon if he's town.
inb4 omg that's so obvious
- This bugged me, I can't see this benefiting the town at all?Rantai wrote:
Actually just to spite you I'm just going to try rp for as long as I can keep it up.
- Page 9: Rantai starts to form a bit more coherent arguments, albeit under spoiler tags. A bunch of meta arguments I don't get since I haven't played Mafia with you guys. Irreversible also shows up for a sec, but his promised post doesn't. Sakura is around but seems content to watch the CB-vs-Rantai dance.Irreversible wrote:
I'll try to catch things up, my post will come in a few hours for sure, sorry for inactiity
If you see something, please let us know what it is. Also, noob question: What's ISO?CalignoBot wrote:
Free cookie to anyone who can guess what the problem with his ISO is.
ISO = Isolation; literally just one person's posts in isolationKytoxid wrote:
If you see something, please let us know what it is. Also, noob question: What's ISO?CalignoBot wrote:
Free cookie to anyone who can guess what the problem with his ISO is.
Because your playing style as scum does not mean his playing style as scum.CalignoBot wrote:
Why exactly can't I do this?Raging Bull wrote:
@ Calingo, you can't really say that just because Rantai has same style like you as scum that Rantai is scum.That doesn't invalidate the reason for using it in the first place.Raging Bull wrote:
You also can't seem to back it up with anything since you even said we cannot prove or disprove it.
Uhm yes, i don't really get if this is meant ironic or not.. maybe you just said it, without voting him to pretend looking scummy and put the suspiciousness (?) on the others, and this is what currently buggs me the mostDakeDekaane wrote:
I bet there's scum in Royston wagon if he's town.
inb4 omg that's so obvious
So you think Sakura is scum?Irreversible wrote:
Sakura, in other games you're always really scumhunting, but not in this game. and i mean.. you were the one who even taught me scumhunting so.. :/
You're getting closer. Add one more significant detail and it becomes scummy.Raging Bull wrote:
There's nothing significant about my ISO, unless that is what you meant (haha).
Because your playing style as scum does not mean his playing style as scum.CalignoBot wrote:
Why exactly can't I do this?Raging Bull wrote:
@ Calingo, you can't really say that just because Rantai has same style like you as scum that Rantai is scum.That doesn't invalidate the reason for using it in the first place.Raging Bull wrote:
You also can't seem to back it up with anything since you even said we cannot prove or disprove it.
Neither.Raging Bull wrote:
And why did you even get off Rantai case? Has he done anything to you that feel like unvoting for? Or perhaps you are just unvoting now since people just aren't jumping on Rantai bandwagon as you hoped it would.
CalignoBot wrote:
Which question? I probably missed or forgot about it.
I saw one post regarding it but want to check what you say first.Rantai wrote:
Which post did you try to clear it up?
Feels like to let it just run for whatever reason instead of clarifying (well, depends on where you tried to clear it up obviously).
Yup, I'm an ass like that. Seriously though my read on Ono is null, but as they hasn't posted anything in 5 days I don't see them as an asset to townDakeDekaane wrote:
So you will sacrifice another person?
why's that?NoHitter wrote:
Mafia probably have a Ninja.
Wait you're a Watcher+Tracker?NoHitter wrote:
I guess I can say it out now.
Kytoxid targeted Dake, but no one targeted Kytoxid, yet Kytokid died.
Possible hider behind a scum?NoHitter wrote:
I guess I can say it out now.
Kytoxid targeted Dake, but no one targeted Kytoxid, yet Kytokid died.
Not quite. I don't want to disclose my full role yet though.Sakura wrote:
Wait you're a Watcher+Tracker?
Yeah god damn that was stupid of me. I wanted to get calingo off my back since he wouldnt explain his vote. But I made myself more sus picious to him.Royston wrote:
Okay, thanks. I couldn't find it in the wiki.
Also wut three people have softclaimed now for some reason?
I think you'd do the same when a person votes another just to save his ass from being lynched.Raging Bull wrote:
Little bit suspicious of DD since it looked like he was trying to defend Ono without being too involved. p/2642650
CalignoBot wrote:
Nah, that's a Sakura-tell.
Nein.NoHitter wrote:
OK let's try this:
1-shot?
Those who get this please say so.
You didn't do something did you.NoHitter wrote:
OK let's try this:
1-shot?
Those who get this please say so.
Nope.NoHitter wrote:
OK let's try this:
1-shot?
Those who get this please say so.
DakeDekaane wrote:
Unvote
Vote: RB
Gut feeling.
and i couldn't really read anything here o.e..Did I got it right?Raging Bull wrote:
DakeDekaane wrote:
Unvote
Vote: RB
Gut feeling.
Hi
