Oh wow, I didn't even notice. My brain just treated it as Unvote and then Vote on me.
Raging Bull wrote:
Irreversible wrote:
Raging Bull, i want to talk a bit with you. I didn't read much from you, wanna tell me your current thoughts?
p/2363168
Do you not read before posting?
cute scumslip Deadline is in a few hours, right?fartownik wrote:
Wait, really? You vote me because that sentence or what?Irreversible wrote:
i cry now.
weh
weh (it's ok.) xD
Vote: fartwonik
Unvote
huehueheuheu now i feel better
Backfire : Don't want to comment, but maybe town.Irreversible wrote:
lincoolm.. your thoughts about backfire and hiya?
Jeez, tiper. Really, instead tell us something, like why you're lurking and tell us who is scum or who is town, why keep in the backstage and watching people?tiper wrote:
Ok, it looks like this game is already over to me. And I have nothing to claim because of this setup. Hope, you'll get something usefull after my lynching, guys.
I wanted to know what others' have to say about the idea. If someone was against I'd reconsider it.Raging Bull wrote:
I don't understand why people come up with a plan and they themselves don't give information first.
Anyways protected myself. I thought being JOAT I would die.
If you don't have anything to hide, tell us. Pls, but it's just stupid. You want to know something about the others, but yourself, you don't tell it to anybody.fartownik wrote:
Not telling mine yet since I wanna hear from others about this before.
Haven't you read last pages? Please re-read like last 15-20 pages, you will know.Raging Bull wrote:
Wait so why did you provoke him to suicide?
And this stops your absorption how?DakeDekaane wrote:
hider targeted him.[/b]
What do you mean with Left Irreversible and Konei? o.oLincolm wrote:
Oh hi.
Left Irreversible and Konei.
Vote : Dake
Placeholder for now. I need to do some research if I'm right or not.
Watcher was scum btw~Lincolm wrote:
Watcher dead isn't good.
OH JEEZ, IT IS GREEN. I THOUGHT IT IS TOWN.Sakura wrote:
Lincolm, why is watched dead a bad thing if he was scum?
Welp, but not from kill. I already asked it to NoHitter.Irreversible wrote:
i protected lincolm
fartownik wrote:
A good thing to do now would be everyone sharing their night actions. If we know everyone's action it will be easier to establish why there was no second kill during the night, also there's only 3 scum left which means the chance of lying the night action's been lowered drastically.
Not telling mine yet since I wanna hear from others about this before.
Still on research.DakeDekaane wrote:
Watcher was scum btw~Lincolm wrote:
Watcher dead isn't good.
And why you voted me? I'm curious. If it was because I didn't absorb you, please, don't be selfish. I wanted to keep more eyes to confirm our actions.
Missed the underline.Sakura wrote:
Sure, tho you missed this postfartownik wrote:
A good thing to do now would be everyone sharing their night actions. If we know everyone's action it will be easier to establish why there was no second kill during the night, also there's only 3 scum left which means the chance of lying the night action's been lowered drastically.
Not telling mine yet since I wanna hear from others about this before.
I know o.oLincolm wrote:
Welp, but not from kill. I already asked it to NoHitter.Irreversible wrote:
i protected lincolm
And you still vote me :ILincolm wrote:
Still on research.
Why you didn't ask at nightRantai wrote:
Oh before I go;
@Mod: Does this version of Hider die upon hiding behind scum
@Mod: Can a Hider avoid a roleblock?
You mean yourself, fartownik?fartownik wrote:
The most probable is actually Pizzicato being the one sending the kill and failed because got killed. Pizzicato was the newbiest newbie, everyone here is more experienced than him, which means his partner thought he might die that night, that's why he lend the kill to Pizzicato. If this is true, then we should be looking for the most probable scum of D1, and we might come to something.
No. Even get killed, the action still resolved.fartownik wrote:
The most probable is actually Pizzicato being the one sending the kill and failed because got killed. Pizzicato was the newbiest newbie, everyone here is more experienced than him, which means his partner thought he might die that night, that's why he lend the kill to Pizzicato. If this is true, then we should be looking for the most probable scum of D1, and we might come to something.
Shoot, right. I was going ahead of myself to confirm fartownik and myself. I'll keep in mind next time.Lincolm wrote:
Please as tracker / watcher you can confirm someone action and you should the last who claim your target. So, BMin, you should the last who claimed your action. Watcher dead isn't good.
Sheesh. Meh, my bad then.Sakura wrote:
Yeah all kill actions resolve at the same time, so even if he died his kill would still hit.
Irreversible wrote:
you ignore my conclusion, fartownik?
Your suspicion on me seems silly, most would probably agree. You pick up to random stuff that shouldn't even count as judging scum most times and forget about things I've done for town.Irreversible wrote:
Since nothing is going on and I have enough reasons now
Vote: fartownik
Reason 1) Always avoiding my question, sorry but for now it's just a bit too suspicious. Never avoided any.
Reason 2) Playing aggressiv, but as soon as someone asks you something, you get quiet. Example please?
Reason 3) Why did you want to know who did what so badly? (Using their abilities). And after all, you didn't even want to tell us what you've voted.. well. OF course, it's useful to know who what did, but yeah, not that way. For me, it's just fake-scumhunting. 1. I didn't want it 'SO BADLY", I just thought it would be a good idea, and even asked others if it is. 2. I've given my action in the end. I didn't want to reveal it first to see some other roles actions because my answer might've affected their answer too, but later thought it's not fair for them and revealed it right away.
Reason 4) You got weirdly defensive here: t/136834/start=557 You just read Vote: fartownik, right? You already raged there, scumslip imo. No. Just misread. Stop picking to random stuff.
Reason 5) Remember when you wondered about that, that i wanna have activities from the others? You called it 'nervous'. t/136834/start=595 same here, i'd say. Ye, it's totally nervous.
nuff nuff for the moment.
How can you not be sure what i'm trying to find? Please, are you blind?fartownik wrote:
Your suspicion on me seems silly, most would probably agree. You pick up to random stuff that shouldn't even count as judging scum most times and forget about things I've done for town.Irreversible wrote:
Since nothing is going on and I have enough reasons now
Vote: fartownik
Reason 1) Always avoiding my question, sorry but for now it's just a bit too suspicious. Never avoided any. lies
Reason 2) Playing aggressiv, but as soon as someone asks you something, you get quiet. Example please? i already told you about it earlier. but i'm going to look for examples later (when i'm at home)
Reason 3) Why did you want to know who did what so badly? (Using their abilities). And after all, you didn't even want to tell us what you've voted.. well. OF course, it's useful to know who what did, but yeah, not that way. For me, it's just fake-scumhunting. 1. I didn't want it 'SO BADLY", I just thought it would be a good idea, and even asked others if it is. 2. I've given my action in the end. I didn't want to reveal it first to see some other roles actions because my answer might've affected their answer too, but later thought it's not fair for them and revealed it right away. mght be true, but still, you wrote 'everone' in bold.
Reason 4) You got weirdly defensive here: t/136834/start=557 You just read Vote: fartownik, right? You already raged there, scumslip imo. No. Just misread. Stop picking to random stuff. you seem to be angry about it again
Reason 5) Remember when you wondered about that, that i wanna have activities from the others? You called it 'nervous'. t/136834/start=595 same here, i'd say. Ye, it's totally nervous. you said it yourself.
nuff nuff for the moment.
Not sure if you don't know what you're doing or try to find your own suspect so badly.